Mention `where.not` in the example

...so it doesn't look like you *have* to use SQL strings for that case (not
anymore!). Would like to replace the SQL string example with something that
you cannot do with the "normal" query API, but I could not come up with a
short, realistic example. Suggestions welcome!

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb b/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb
index 025e39c02d..e70d492efd 100644
--- a/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb
+++ b/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ class EnumTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase
     refute_equal @book, Book.where(status: :written).first
     assert_equal @book, Book.where(status: [:proposed]).first
     refute_equal @book, Book.where(status: [:written]).first
+    refute_equal @book, Book.where.not(status: :proposed).first
+    assert_equal @book, Book.where.not(status: :written).first
   end
 
   test "find via where with strings" do
@@ -49,6 +51,8 @@ class EnumTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase
     refute_equal @book, Book.where(status: "written").first
     assert_equal @book, Book.where(status: ["proposed"]).first
     refute_equal @book, Book.where(status: ["written"]).first
+    refute_equal @book, Book.where.not(status: "proposed").first
+    assert_equal @book, Book.where.not(status: "written").first
   end
 
   test "build from scope" do