From 698afe1173c6501d29b98389204d3ac70aaea910 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Godfrey Chan Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:04:16 -0800 Subject: Mention `where.not` in the example ...so it doesn't look like you *have* to use SQL strings for that case (not anymore!). Would like to replace the SQL string example with something that you cannot do with the "normal" query API, but I could not come up with a short, realistic example. Suggestions welcome! --- activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'activerecord/test') diff --git a/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb b/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb index 025e39c02d..e70d492efd 100644 --- a/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb +++ b/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ class EnumTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase refute_equal @book, Book.where(status: :written).first assert_equal @book, Book.where(status: [:proposed]).first refute_equal @book, Book.where(status: [:written]).first + refute_equal @book, Book.where.not(status: :proposed).first + assert_equal @book, Book.where.not(status: :written).first end test "find via where with strings" do @@ -49,6 +51,8 @@ class EnumTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase refute_equal @book, Book.where(status: "written").first assert_equal @book, Book.where(status: ["proposed"]).first refute_equal @book, Book.where(status: ["written"]).first + refute_equal @book, Book.where.not(status: "proposed").first + assert_equal @book, Book.where.not(status: "written").first end test "build from scope" do -- cgit v1.2.3