blob: 643a6f2b7cff55c05a3aaf0f56410864a588bde3 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
|
require 'active_support/core_ext/range.rb'
module ActiveModel
module Validations
module Clusivity #:nodoc:
ERROR_MESSAGE = "An object with the method #include? or a proc or lambda is required, " <<
"and must be supplied as the :in (or :within) option of the configuration hash"
def check_validity!
unless [:include?, :call].any?{ |method| delimiter.respond_to?(method) }
raise ArgumentError, ERROR_MESSAGE
end
end
private
def include?(record, value)
exclusions = delimiter.respond_to?(:call) ? delimiter.call(record) : delimiter
exclusions.send(inclusion_method(exclusions), value)
end
def delimiter
@delimiter ||= options[:in] || options[:within]
end
# In Ruby 1.9 <tt>Range#include?</tt> on non-numeric ranges checks all possible values in the
# range for equality, so it may be slow for large ranges. The new <tt>Range#cover?</tt>
# uses the previous logic of comparing a value with the range endpoints.
def inclusion_method(enumerable)
enumerable.is_a?(Range) ? :cover? : :include?
end
end
end
end
|