| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Rollback parent transaction when children fails to update
Rails supports autosave associations on the owner of a `has_many`
relationship. In certain situation, if the children of the association
fail to save, the parent is not rolled back.
```ruby
class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many(:employees)
end
company = Company.new
employee = company.employees.new
company.save
```
In the previous example, if the Employee failed to save, the Company
will not be rolled back. It will remain in the database with no
associated Employee.
I expect the `company.save` call to be atomic, and either create all or
none of the records.
The persistance of the Company already starts a transaction that nests
it's children. However, it didn't track the success or failure of it's
children in this very situation, and the outermost transaction is not
rolled back.
This PR makes the change to track the success of the child insertion and
rollback the parent if any of the children fail.
* Change the test to reflect what we expect
Once #32862 is merged, rolling back a record will rollback it's state to match
the state before the database changes were applied
* Use only the public API to express the tests
* Refactor to avoid reassigning saved for nested reflections
[Guillaume Malette + Rafael Mendonça França]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`after_initialize`
`becomes` creates new object and copies attributes from the receiver. If
new object has mutation tracker which is created in `after_initialize`,
it should be cleared since it is for discarded attributes.
But if the receiver doesn't have mutation tracker yet, it will not be
cleared properly.
It should be cleared regardless of whether the receiver has mutation
tracker or not.
Fixes #32867.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adds test case for failing issue
Moves set_value back to protected
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow up of #32514.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a bug with building an object that has multiple
`has_many :through` associations through the same object.
Previously, when building the object via .new, the intermediate
object would be created instead of just being built.
Here's an example:
Given a GameBoard, that has_one Owner and Collection through Game.
The following line would cause a game object to be created in the
database.
GameBoard.new(owner: some_owner, collection: some_collection)
Whereas, if passing only one of those associations into `.new` would
cause the Game object to be built and not created in the database.
Now the above code will only build the Game object, and not save it.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Bring back private class methods accessibility in named scope
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The receiver in a scope was changed from `klass` to `relation` itself
for all scopes (named scope, default_scope, and association scope)
behaves consistently.
In addition. Before 5.2, if both an AR model class and a Relation
instance have same named methods (e.g. `arel_attribute`,
`predicate_builder`, etc), named scope doesn't respect relation instance
information.
For example:
```ruby
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments1, class_name: "RecentComment1"
has_many :comments2, class_name: "RecentComment2"
end
class RecentComment1 < ActiveRecord::Base
self.table_name = "comments"
default_scope { where(arel_attribute(:created_at).gteq(2.weeks.ago)) }
end
class RecentComment2 < ActiveRecord::Base
self.table_name = "comments"
default_scope { recent_updated }
scope :recent_updated, -> { where(arel_attribute(:updated_at).gteq(2.weeks.ago)) }
end
```
If eager loading `Post.eager_load(:comments1, :comments2).to_a`,
`:comments1` (default_scope) respects aliased table name, but
`:comments2` (using named scope) may not work correctly since named
scope doesn't respect relation instance information. See also 801ccab.
But this is a breaking change between releases without deprecation.
I decided to bring back private class methods accessibility in named
scope.
Fixes #31740.
Fixes #32331.
|
|/
|
|
| |
Fix deprecation warnings from with_lock
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a prefix option to ActiveRecord::Store.store_accessor and
ActiveRecord::Store.store. This option allows stores to have identical keys
with different accessors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is an alternative of #31877 to fix #31876 caused by #28808.
This issue was caused by a combination of several loose implementation.
* finding automatic inverse association of polymorphic without context (caused by #28808)
* returning `klass` even if `polymorphic?` (exists before #28808)
* loose verification by `valid_inverse_reflection?` (exists before #28808)
This makes `klass` raise if `polymorphic?` not to be misused.
This issue will not happen unless polymorphic `klass` is misused.
Fixes #31876.
Closes #31877.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3acc5d6 was changed the order of scope evaluation from through scope to
the association's own scope to be prioritized over the through scope.
But the sorting order will be prioritized that is evaluated first. It is
unintentional effect, association scope's sorting order should be
prioritized as well.
Fixes #32008.
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #31998
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of the time the table and predicate_builder
passed to Relation.new are exactly the
arel_table and predicate builder of the
given klass. This uses klass.arel_table
and klass.predicate_builder as the defaults,
so we don't have to pass them in most cases.
This does change the signaure of both Relation and
AssocationRelation. Are we ok with that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When removing a record from a has many through association, the counter
cache was being updated even if the through record halted the callback
chain and prevented itself from being destroyed.
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
When deleting through records, take into account association conditions
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes #18424.
When deleting through records, it didn't take into account the
conditions that may have been affecting join model table, but was
defined in association definition.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Currently reflections keeps the order when first added even if when
redefining association. As a result of the order, redefining through
association which use newly added association will raise
`HasManyThroughOrderError`. We need to redefine reflection order as well
when redefining association.
Fixes #31068.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Use `count(:all)` in HasManyAssociation#count_records
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Problem: Calling `count` on an association can cause invalid SQL queries
to be created where the `SELECT COUNT(a, b, c)` function receives
multiple columns. This will cause a `StatementInvalid` exception later
on.
Solution: Use `count(:all)`, which generates a `SELECT COUNT(*)...`
query independently of the association.
This also includes a test case that, before the fix, broke.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This is a regression test for #27864.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
update_attribute previously stopped execution, before saving and before
running callbacks, if the record's attributes hadn't changed. [The
documentation](http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Persistence.html#method-i-update_attribute)
says that "Callbacks are invoked", which was not happening if the
persisted attributes hadn't changed.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
```
# create_table :posts do |t|
# t.integer :comments_count, default: 0
# t.integer :lock_version
# t.timestamps
# end
class Post < ApplicationRecord
end
# create_table :comments do |t|
# t.belongs_to :post
# end
class Comment < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :post, touch: true, counter_cache: true
end
```
Before:
```
post = Post.create!
# => begin transaction
INSERT INTO "posts" ("created_at", "updated_at", "lock_version")
VALUES ("2017-12-11 21:27:11.387397", "2017-12-11 21:27:11.387397", 0)
commit transaction
comment = Comment.create!(post: post)
# => begin transaction
INSERT INTO "comments" ("post_id") VALUES (1)
UPDATE "posts" SET "comments_count" = COALESCE("comments_count", 0) + 1,
"lock_version" = COALESCE("lock_version", 0) + 1 WHERE "posts"."id" = 1
UPDATE "posts" SET "updated_at" = '2017-12-11 21:27:11.398330',
"lock_version" = 1 WHERE "posts"."id" = 1 AND "posts"."lock_version" = 0
rollback transaction
# => ActiveRecord::StaleObjectError: Attempted to touch a stale object: Post.
Comment.take.destroy!
# => begin transaction
DELETE FROM "comments" WHERE "comments"."id" = 1
UPDATE "posts" SET "comments_count" = COALESCE("comments_count", 0) - 1,
"lock_version" = COALESCE("lock_version", 0) + 1 WHERE "posts"."id" = 1
UPDATE "posts" SET "updated_at" = '2017-12-11 21:42:47.785901',
"lock_version" = 1 WHERE "posts"."id" = 1 AND "posts"."lock_version" = 0
rollback transaction
# => ActiveRecord::StaleObjectError: Attempted to touch a stale object: Post.
```
After:
```
post = Post.create!
# => begin transaction
INSERT INTO "posts" ("created_at", "updated_at", "lock_version")
VALUES ("2017-12-11 21:27:11.387397", "2017-12-11 21:27:11.387397", 0)
commit transaction
comment = Comment.create!(post: post)
# => begin transaction
INSERT INTO "comments" ("post_id") VALUES (1)
UPDATE "posts" SET "comments_count" = COALESCE("comments_count", 0) + 1,
"lock_version" = COALESCE("lock_version", 0) + 1,
"updated_at" = '2017-12-11 21:37:09.802642' WHERE "posts"."id" = 1
commit transaction
comment.destroy!
# => begin transaction
DELETE FROM "comments" WHERE "comments"."id" = 1
UPDATE "posts" SET "comments_count" = COALESCE("comments_count", 0) - 1,
"lock_version" = COALESCE("lock_version", 0) + 1,
"updated_at" = '2017-12-11 21:39:02.685520' WHERE "posts"."id" = 1
commit transaction
```
Fixes #31199.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Record saved in save_has_one_association already make call to association.loaded! via record's before_save callback of save_belongs_to_association,
but this will reload object if accessed in record's validation.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
A relation includes `klass`, so it can not be used as it is if current
class is different from `current_scope.klass`. It should be created new
relation by current class to respect the klass and STI constraint.
Fixes #17603.
Fixes #23576.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Since `MocktailDesigner` inherits `DrinkDesigner` and can not be used
alone.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
parent relation's aliases
Building association scope in join dependency should respect the parent
relation's aliases to avoid using the same alias name more than once.
Fixes #30681.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Since #29301, `arel_attribute` respects a custom table name.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The order of scope evaluation should be from through scope to the
association's own scope. Otherwise the association's scope cannot affect
to through scope.
Fixes #13677.
Closes #28449.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Defined scope treats nil as `all`, but scope in associations isn't so.
If the result of the scope is nil, most features on associations will be
broken. It should treat nil as `all` like defined scope.
Fixes #20823.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Without this fix, preloading `:comments_with_include` will cause the
following error:
```
% bundle exec ruby -w -Itest test/cases/associations/eager_test.rb -n test_eager_with_has_many_through_join_model_with_include
Using sqlite3
Run options: -n test_eager_with_has_many_through_join_model_with_include --seed 1502
E
Error:
EagerAssociationTest#test_eager_with_has_many_through_join_model_with_include:
ActiveRecord::AssociationNotFoundError: Association named 'post' was not found on Post; perhaps you misspelled it?
```
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
There were similar pull requests #26370 #27575 fixed by different way
by moving `require "models/post"` before `require "models/comment"`
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix `COUNT(DISTINCT ...)` with `ORDER BY` and `LIMIT`
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | | |
Fix `counter_cache` double increment
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
When an `after_create` callback did `update_attributes` on a record with
multiple `belongs_to` associations with counter caches, even numbered
associations would have their counters double-incremented. Fixes to
`ActiveModel::Dirty` in 020abad fixed this.
This adds regression tests for this bug fixed incidentally in the other
commit, which also removed the need for the workaround using
@_after_create_counter_called.
|
|/ / / |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Since 5c71000, it has lost to be able to unscope `default_scope` in STI
associations. This change will use `.empty_scope?` instead of
`.values.empty?` to regard as an empty scope if only have
`type_condition`.
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Add a test case for overwriting existing condition on associations
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Overwriting existing condition on associations has already supported
(23bcc65 for eager loading, 2bfa2c0 for preloading).
Fixes #27724.
Closes #29154.
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
`FakeKlass` in `relation_test.rb` and `relation/mutation_test.rb` are
almost the same.
|