aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/activerecord/test/cases
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
| * | | Allow column name with function (e.g. `length(title)`) as safe SQL stringRyuta Kamizono2019-06-103-34/+35
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, almost all "Dangerous query method" warnings are false alarm. As long as almost all the warnings are false alarm, developers think "Let's ignore the warnings by using `Arel.sql()`, it actually is false alarm in practice.", so I think we should effort to reduce false alarm in order to make the warnings valuable. This allows column name with function (e.g. `length(title)`) as safe SQL string, which is very common false alarm pattern, even in the our codebase. Related 6c82b6c99, 6607ecb2a, #36420. Fixes #32995.
* | | | All modern adapters returns a numeric value as the result of numeric calculationRyuta Kamizono2019-06-112-10/+2
|/ / /
* | | Allow `column_name AS alias` as safe SQL stringRyuta Kamizono2019-06-101-0/+10
| | |
* | | NULLS { FIRST | LAST } is safe SQL string since ↵Ryuta Kamizono2019-06-071-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6c82b6c99d86f37e61f935fb342cccd725d6c7d4 There is no need to be wrapped by `Arel.sql()`.
* | | Merge pull request #36429 from bogdan/fix-preloading-duplicate-recordsRyuta Kamizono2019-06-071-0/+5
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | Fix preloading on AR::Relation where records are duplicated by a join
| * | | Fix preloading on AR::Relation where records are duplicated by a joinBogdan Gusiev2019-06-061-0/+5
| | | |
* | | | Merge pull request #36426 from abhaynikam/bump-codeclimate-rubocop-versionRyuta Kamizono2019-06-061-2/+0
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | Bump rubocop to 0.71
| * | | | Bump rubocop to 0.71Abhay Nikam2019-06-061-2/+0
| | | | |
* | | | | Merge pull request #36420 from kamipo/quoted_identifier_regexRyuta Kamizono2019-06-063-7/+29
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / / |/| | | | Allow quoted identifier string as safe SQL string
| * | | | Allow quoted identifier string as safe SQL stringRyuta Kamizono2019-06-063-7/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently `posts.title` is regarded as a safe SQL string, but `"posts"."title"` (it is a result of `quote_table_name("posts.title")`) is regarded as an unsafe SQL string even though a result of `quote_table_name` should obviously be regarded as a safe SQL string, since the column name matcher doesn't respect quotation, it is a little annoying. This changes the column name matcher to allow quoted identifiers as safe SQL string, now all results of the `quote_table_name` are regarded as safe SQL string.
* | | | | Move schema cache from connection to pooleileencodes2019-06-051-1/+0
|/ / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This PR proposes moving the schema cache from the connection to the pool so the connection can ask the pool for the cache. In a future PR our goal is to be able to read the yaml file from the pool so we can get rid of the `active_record.check_schema_cache_dump` initializer. This will fix the issues surrounding dumping the schema cache and mulitple databases. Why do we want to get rid of the initializer you ask? Well I was looking at #34449 and trying to make it work for our usecase and it revealed A LOT of problems. There are a few issues that I will fix in remaining PRs with SchemaMigration, but there's a big glaring issue with this initializer. When you have an application with multiple databases we'll need to loop through all the configurations and set the schema cache on those connections. The problem is on initialization we only have one connection - the one for Ar::Base. This is fine in a single db application but not fine in multi-db. If we follow the pattern in #34449 and establish a connection to those other dbs we will end up setting the cache on the _connection object_ rather than on all connections that connect for that config. So even though we looped through the configs and assigned the cache the cache will not be set (or will be set wrong) once the app is booted because the connection objects after boot are _different_ than the connection objects we assigned the cache to. After trying many different ways to set the schema cache `@tenderlove` and I came to the conclusion that the initializer is problematic, as is setting the schema cache twice. This is part 1 to move the cache to the pool so the cache can read from the schema cache yaml file instead of setting it when initializing the app. To do this we have created a `NullPool` that initializes an empty cache. I put the `get_schema_cache` and `set_schema_cache` in an `AbstractPool` so we can share code between `ConnectionPool` and `NullPool` instead of duplicating code. Now we only need to set the schema_cache on the pool rather than the connection. In `discard!` we need to unset the connection from the schema_cache - we still want the cache just not the connection.
* | | | Merge pull request #36394 from eileencodes/treat-application-record-as-primaryEileen M. Uchitelle2019-06-051-0/+13
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | Treat ActiveRecord::Base and ApplicationRecord as "primary"
| * | | | Treat ActiveRecord::Base and ApplicationRecord as "primary"eileencodes2019-06-051-0/+13
| |/ / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When someone has a multi-db application their `ApplicationRecord` will look like: ```ruby class ApplicationRecord < ActiveRecord::Base self.abstract_class = true connects_to database: { writing: :primary, reading: :replica } end ``` This will cause us to open 2 connections to ActiveRecord::Base's database when we actually only want 1. This is because Rails sees `ApplicationRecord` and thinks it's a new connection, not the existing `ActiveRecord::Base` connection because the `connection_specification_name` is different. This PR changes `ApplicationRecord` classes to consider themselves the same as the "primary" connection. Fixes #36382
* / / / Fix sqlite3 collation parsing when using decimal columns.Martin Schuster2019-06-041-0/+9
|/ / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If an sqlite3 table contains a decimal column behind columns with a collation definition, then parsing the collation of all preceeding columns will fail -- the collation will be missed without notice.
* | | Merge pull request #36384 from ↵Ryuta Kamizono2019-06-031-1/+21
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | | | | | | | guigs/fix-invalid-schema-when-pk-column-has-comment Fix invalid schema dump when primary key column has a comment
| * | Fix invalid schema dump when primary key column has a commentGuilherme Goettems Schneider2019-06-031-1/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before this fix it would either generate an invalid schema, passing `comment` option twice to `create_table`, or it move the comment from primary key column to the table if table had no comment when the dump was generated. The situation now is that a comment on primary key will be ignored (not present on schema). Fixes #29966
* | | Address test_pluck_columns_with_same_name failure due to nondeterministic ↵Yasuo Honda2019-06-021-1/+1
|/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | sort order ```ruby $ bundle exec rake test_postgresql ... snip ... Failure: CalculationsTest#test_pluck_columns_with_same_name [/home/yahonda/git/rails/activerecord/test/cases/calculations_test.rb:842]: --- expected +++ actual @@ -1 +1 @@ -[["The First Topic", "The Second Topic of the day"], ["The Third Topic of the day", "The Fourth Topic of the day"]] +[["The Third Topic of the day", "The Fourth Topic of the day"], ["The First Topic", "The Second Topic of the day"]] ```
* | Fix table comment also being applied to the primary key columnGuilherme Goettems Schneider2019-05-311-0/+5
| |
* | Address intermittent CI failure due to non-determined sort orderRyuta Kamizono2019-05-301-6/+7
| | | | | | | | https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/61384#ad441461-87d8-4bdc-a71f-61921fe2df2e/993-1004
* | Address intermittent CI failure in cascaded_eager_loading_test.rbRyuta Kamizono2019-05-291-12/+12
| | | | | | | | https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/61362#99165d42-172d-4ad5-bf72-b29d8cd44f3e/995-1006
* | Address intermittent CI failure due to unfilled schema columns cacheRyuta Kamizono2019-05-291-3/+3
| | | | | | | | https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/61358#a78ee50e-30b5-48a2-858f-63eba287d919/1290-1298
* | Use `capture_sql` instead of `assert_sql` with no patternRyuta Kamizono2019-05-223-15/+12
| | | | | | | | And no longer need to except SCHEMA SQLs manually since 0810c07.
* | Give up filling schema cache before `assert_no_queries`Ryuta Kamizono2019-05-226-90/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit a1ee4a9ff9d4a3cb255365310ead0dc7b739c6be. Even if a1ee4a9 is applied, CI is still flakiness. https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/61252#2c090afa-aa84-4a2b-8b81-9f09219222c6/994-1005 https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/61252#2e55bf83-1bde-44a2-a4f1-b5c3f6820fb4/929-938 Failing tests by whether schema cache is filled or not, it actually means that whether SCHEMA SQLs are executed or not is not target for the tests. So I've reverted commit a1ee4a9 which filling schema cache before `assert_no_queries`, and replace `assert_no_queries` to `assert_queries(0)`.
* | Fall back to type casting from the connection adapterRyuta Kamizono2019-05-211-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unfortunately, a11a8ff had no effect as long as using bind param, and was not tested. This ensures making the intent of a11a8ff, which fall back to type casting from the connection adapter. Fixes #35205. ``` % ARCONN=postgresql bundle exec ruby -w -Itest test/cases/relation/where_test.rb -n test_type_casting_nested_joins Using postgresql Run options: -n test_type_casting_nested_joins --seed 55730 # Running: E Error: ActiveRecord::WhereTest#test_type_casting_nested_joins: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: PG::InvalidTextRepresentation: ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: "2-foo" rails test test/cases/relation/where_test.rb:30 Finished in 0.245778s, 4.0687 runs/s, 0.0000 assertions/s. 1 runs, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skips ```
* | Except SCHEMA SQLs in `capture_sql`Ryuta Kamizono2019-05-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Testing the result of `capture_sql` is fragile, it is due to whether SCHEMA SQLs are executed or not depends on whether schema cache is filled or not. https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/61248#a5b9dc59-ff0c-40c0-b56e-0895662fbc4c/993-1004 https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/61248#1157b389-f2c7-4554-b6e5-a37624a0e74a/996-1005 I've confirmed all `capture_sql` use cases in our code base, all cases won't expect SCHEMA SQLs are included. ``` % git grep -n capture_sql test/cases/associations/belongs_to_associations_test.rb:202: sql = capture_sql { comment.post } test/cases/associations/belongs_to_associations_test.rb:204: assert_not_equal sql, capture_sql { comment.post } test/cases/associations/has_many_associations_test.rb:169: sql = capture_sql { post.comments.to_a } test/cases/associations/has_many_associations_test.rb:171: assert_not_equal sql, capture_sql { post.comments.to_a } test/cases/associations/has_many_associations_test.rb:276: expected_sql = capture_sql { author.thinking_posts.delete_all } test/cases/associations/has_many_associations_test.rb:281: loaded_sql = capture_sql { author.thinking_posts.delete_all } test/cases/associations/has_many_associations_test.rb:289: expected_sql = capture_sql { author.posts.delete_all } test/cases/associations/has_many_associations_test.rb:294: loaded_sql = capture_sql { author.posts.delete_all } test/cases/associations/left_outer_join_association_test.rb:22: queries = capture_sql do test/cases/associations/left_outer_join_association_test.rb:49: queries = capture_sql { Author.left_outer_joins(:posts).to_a } test/cases/associations/left_outer_join_association_test.rb:54: queries = capture_sql { Author.joins(:posts).left_outer_joins(:posts).to_a } test/cases/associations/left_outer_join_association_test.rb:60: queries = capture_sql { Author.left_outer_joins({}).to_a } test/cases/associations/left_outer_join_association_test.rb:65: queries = capture_sql { Author.left_outer_joins([]).to_a } test/cases/associations/left_outer_join_association_test.rb:78: queries = capture_sql { Author.left_outer_joins(:essays).to_a } test/cases/associations_test.rb:384: log = capture_sql do test/cases/associations_test.rb:399: log = capture_sql do test/cases/associations_test.rb:414: log = capture_sql do test/cases/associations_test.rb:429: log = capture_sql do test/cases/associations_test.rb:444: log = capture_sql do test/cases/associations_test.rb:459: log = capture_sql do test/cases/reflection_test.rb:307: expected_sql = capture_sql { hotel.recipes.to_a } test/cases/reflection_test.rb:312: loaded_sql = capture_sql { hotel.recipes.to_a } test/cases/relation_test.rb:212: queries = capture_sql { Author.joins(:posts).merge(Post.joins(:comments)).to_a } test/cases/relation_test.rb:232: queries = capture_sql { Post.joins(:author, :categorizations).merge(Author.select(:id)).merge(categorizations_with_authors).to_a } test/cases/relation_test.rb:347: log = capture_sql do test/cases/scoping/relation_scoping_test.rb:146: log = capture_sql do test/cases/scoping/relation_scoping_test.rb:159: log = capture_sql do test/cases/test_case.rb:33: def capture_sql test/cases/test_case.rb:41: capture_sql { yield } ```
* | Implicit through table joins should be appeared before user supplied joinsRyuta Kamizono2019-05-191-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | #36293 was an issue for through association with `joins` for a long time, but since #35864 through association with `left_joins` would also be affected by the issue. Implicit through table joins should be appeared before user supplied joins, otherwise loading through association with joins will cause a statement invalid error. Fixes #36293. ``` % ARCONN=postgresql bundle exec ruby -w -Itest test/cases/associations/has_many_through_associations_test .rb -n test_through_association_with_joins Using postgresql Run options: -n test_through_association_with_joins --seed 7116 # Running: E Error: HasManyThroughAssociationsTest#test_through_association_with_joins: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: PG::UndefinedTable: ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table "posts" LINE 1: ... "comments_posts" ON "comments_posts"."post_id" = "posts"."i... ^ : SELECT "comments".* FROM "comments" INNER JOIN "comments" "comments_posts" ON "comments_posts"."post_id" = "posts"."id" INNER JOIN "posts" ON "comments"."post_id" = "posts"."id" WHERE "posts"."author_id" = $1 rails test test/cases/associations/has_many_through_associations_test.rb:61 Finished in 0.388657s, 2.5730 runs/s, 0.0000 assertions/s. 1 runs, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skips ```
* | Merge pull request #36284 from kamipo/fix_eager_loading_with_string_joinsRyuta Kamizono2019-05-151-0/+11
|\ \ | | | | | | Fix eager loading associations with string joins not to raise NoMethodError
| * | Fix eager loading associations with string joins not to raise NoMethodErrorRyuta Kamizono2019-05-151-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | Fixes #34456.
* | | Don't track implicit `touch` mutationRyuta Kamizono2019-05-131-5/+15
| |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This partly reverts the effect of d1107f4d. d1107f4d makes `touch` tracks the mutation whether the `touch` is occurred by explicit or not. Existing apps expects that the previous changes tracks only the changes which is explicit action by users. I'd revert the implicit `touch` mutation tracking since I'd not like to break existing apps. Fixes #36219.
* | Remove ignored_sql from SQLCounter by adding "TRANSACTION" to log nameYasuo Honda2019-05-082-11/+3
|/ | | | | | | | | | This commit adds "TRANSACTION" to savepoint and commit, rollback statements because none of savepoint statements were removed by #36153 since they are not "SCHEMA" statements. Although, only savepoint statements can be labeled as "TRANSACTION" I think all of transaction related method should add this label. Follow up #36153
* Should attempt `committed!`/`rolledback!` to all enrolled records in the ↵Ryuta Kamizono2019-05-071-5/+51
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | transaction Currently, `committed!`/`rolledback!` will only be attempted for the first enrolled record in the transaction, that will cause some problematic behaviors. The first one problem, `clear_transaction_record_state` won't be called even if the transaction is finalized except the first enrolled record. This means that de-duplicated records in the transaction won't refer latest state (e.g. won't happen rolling back record state). The second one problem, the enrolled order is not always the same as the order in which the actions actually happened, the first enrolled record may succeed no actions (e.g. `destroy` has already succeeded on another record during `before_destroy`), it will lose to fire any transactional callbacks. To avoid both problems, we should attempt `committed!`/`rolledback!` to all enrolled records in the transaction.
* Remove redundant `test_too_many_binds`Yasuo Honda2019-05-031-20/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | with `ActiveRecord::BindParameterTest#test_too_many_binds` sqlite adapter has its own `bind_params_length`, `ActiveRecord::BindParameterTest#test_too_many_binds` respects it. * Modified `ActiveRecord::BindParameterTest#test_too_many_binds` to show `bind_params_length` value ``` $ git diff diff --git a/activerecord/test/cases/bind_parameter_test.rb b/activerecord/test/cases/bind_parameter_test.rb index 85685d1d00..83cd07f1d7 100644 --- a/activerecord/test/cases/bind_parameter_test.rb +++ b/activerecord/test/cases/bind_parameter_test.rb @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ def test_statement_cache_with_sql_string_literal def test_too_many_binds bind_params_length = @connection.send(:bind_params_length) + p bind_params_length topics = Topic.where(id: (1 .. bind_params_length).to_a << 2**63) assert_equal Topic.count, topics.count $ ``` * Executed modified `ActiveRecord::BindParameterTest#test_too_many_binds` ``` $ bin/test test/cases/bind_parameter_test.rb -n test_too_many_binds Using sqlite3 Run options: -n test_too_many_binds --seed 47321 999 . Finished in 0.075249s, 13.2892 runs/s, 26.5784 assertions/s. 1 runs, 2 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips $ ```
* Namespace association extension modules under the owner modelJean Boussier2019-05-021-2/+2
|
* Make scope arity check consistent (#36134)Rob Trame2019-05-011-0/+18
| | | | | | | | * Make scope arity check consistent * Add test for arity change [Rob Trame + Rafael Mendonça França]
* Remove database specific sql statements from SQLCounterYasuo Honda2019-05-013-19/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Every database executes different type of sql statement to get metadata then `ActiveRecord::TestCase` ignores these database specific sql statements to make `assert_queries` or `assert_no_queries` work consistently. Connection adapter already labels these statement by setting "SCHEMA" argument, this pull request makes use of "SCHEMA" argument to ignore metadata queries. Here are the details of these changes: * PostgresqlConnectionTest Each of PostgresqlConnectionTest modified just executes corresponding methods https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/fef174f5c524edacbcad846d68400e7fe114a15a/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql/schema_statements.rb#L182-L195 ```ruby # Returns the current database encoding format. def encoding query_value("SELECT pg_encoding_to_char(encoding) FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()", "SCHEMA") end # Returns the current database collation. def collation query_value("SELECT datcollate FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()", "SCHEMA") end # Returns the current database ctype. def ctype query_value("SELECT datctype FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()", "SCHEMA") end ``` * BulkAlterTableMigrationsTest mysql2 adapter executes `SHOW KEYS FROM ...` to see if there is an index already created as below. I think the main concerns of these tests are how each database adapter creates or drops indexes then ignoring `SHOW KEYS FROM` statement makes sense. https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/fef174f5c524edacbcad846d68400e7fe114a15a/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/mysql/schema_statements.rb#L11 ```ruby execute_and_free("SHOW KEYS FROM #{quote_table_name(table_name)}", "SCHEMA") do |result| ``` * Temporary change not included in this commit to show which statements executed ```diff $ git diff diff --git a/activerecord/test/cases/migration_test.rb b/activerecord/test/cases/migration_test.rb index 8e8ed494d9..df05f9bd16 100644 --- a/activerecord/test/cases/migration_test.rb +++ b/activerecord/test/cases/migration_test.rb @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ def test_adding_indexes classname = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.class.name[/[^:]*$/] expected_query_count = { - "Mysql2Adapter" => 3, # Adding an index fires a query every time to check if an index already exists or not + "Mysql2Adapter" => 1, # Adding an index fires a query every time to check if an index already exists or not "PostgreSQLAdapter" => 2, }.fetch(classname) { raise "need an expected query count for #{classname}" @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ def test_removing_index classname = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.class.name[/[^:]*$/] expected_query_count = { - "Mysql2Adapter" => 3, # Adding an index fires a query every time to check if an index already exists or not + "Mysql2Adapter" => 1, # Adding an index fires a query every time to check if an index already exists or not "PostgreSQLAdapter" => 2, }.fetch(classname) { raise "need an expected query count for #{classname}" $ ``` * Executed these modified tests ```ruby $ ARCONN=mysql2 bin/test test/cases/migration_test.rb -n /index/ Using mysql2 Run options: -n /index/ --seed 8462 F Failure: BulkAlterTableMigrationsTest#test_adding_indexes [/home/yahonda/git/rails/activerecord/test/cases/migration_test.rb:863]: 3 instead of 1 queries were executed. Queries: SHOW KEYS FROM `delete_me` SHOW KEYS FROM `delete_me` ALTER TABLE `delete_me` ADD UNIQUE INDEX `awesome_username_index` (`username`), ADD INDEX `index_delete_me_on_name_and_age` (`name`, `age`). Expected: 1 Actual: 3 bin/test test/cases/migration_test.rb:848 F Failure: BulkAlterTableMigrationsTest#test_removing_index [/home/yahonda/git/rails/activerecord/test/cases/migration_test.rb:895]: 3 instead of 1 queries were executed. Queries: SHOW KEYS FROM `delete_me` SHOW KEYS FROM `delete_me` ALTER TABLE `delete_me` DROP INDEX `index_delete_me_on_name`, ADD UNIQUE INDEX `new_name_index` (`name`). Expected: 1 Actual: 3 bin/test test/cases/migration_test.rb:879 .. Finished in 0.379245s, 10.5473 runs/s, 7.9105 assertions/s. 4 runs, 3 assertions, 2 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips $ ``` * ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::Savepoints Left `self.ignored_sql` to ignore savepoint related statements because these SQL statements are not related "SCHEMA" ``` self.ignored_sql = [/^SAVEPOINT/, /^ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT/, /^RELEASE SAVEPOINT/] ``` https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/fef174f5c524edacbcad846d68400e7fe114a15a/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/savepoints.rb#L10-L20 ```ruby def create_savepoint(name = current_savepoint_name) execute("SAVEPOINT #{name}") end def exec_rollback_to_savepoint(name = current_savepoint_name) execute("ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT #{name}") end def release_savepoint(name = current_savepoint_name) execute("RELEASE SAVEPOINT #{name}") end ```
* Should take the record's state of first action in the transactionRyuta Kamizono2019-04-301-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the same id's records are saved and/or destroyed in the transaction, commit callbackes will only run for the first enrolled record. https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/a023e2180093ebc517a642aaf21f3c7241c67657/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/transaction.rb#L115-L119 The regression #36132 is caused due to #35920 changed the enrollment order that the first action's record will be enrolled to last in the transaction. We could not change the the enrollment order as long as someone depends on the enrollment order. Fixes #36132.
* Fix merging left_joins to maintain its own `join_type` contextRyuta Kamizono2019-04-271-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This fixes a regression for #35864. Usually, stashed joins (mainly eager loading) are performed as LEFT JOINs. But the case of merging joins/left_joins of different class, that (stashed) joins are performed as the same `join_type` as the parent context for now. Since #35864, both (joins/left_joins) stashed joins might be contained in `joins_values`, so each stashed joins should maintain its own `join_type` context. Fixes #36103.
* Merge pull request #32313 from lulalala/model_error_as_objectRafael França2019-04-243-13/+19
|\ | | | | Model error as object
| * Assert deprecationlulalala2019-03-311-2/+2
| |
| * Raise deprecation for calling `[:f] = 'b'` or `[:f] << 'b'`lulalala2019-03-311-6/+10
| | | | | | | | Revert some tests to ensure back compatibility
| * Fix spec as generate_message is no longer called during validationlulalala2019-03-311-0/+2
| |
| * Fix misalignment caused by SHA eebb9ddf9ba559a510975c486fe59a4edc9da97dlulalala2019-03-311-5/+5
| |
* | Merge pull request #35869 from ↵Ryuta Kamizono2019-04-251-1/+38
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | abhaynikam/35866-add-touch-option-for-has-one-association Adds missing touch option to has_one association
| * | Adds touch option to has_one associationAbhay Nikam2019-04-251-1/+38
| | |
* | | Fix sliced IN clauses to be groupedRyuta Kamizono2019-04-246-46/+25
|/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | Follow up of #35838. And also this refactors `in_clause_length` handling is entirely integrated in Arel visitor.
* | Make association builder methods privateRyuta Kamizono2019-04-241-1/+1
| |
* | Merge pull request #36029 from kamipo/deprecate_where_notRyuta Kamizono2019-04-232-6/+51
|\ \ | | | | | | Deprecate `where.not` working as NOR and will be changed to NAND in Rails 6.1
| * | Deprecate `where.not` working as NOR and will be changed to NAND in Rails 6.1Ryuta Kamizono2019-04-192-6/+51
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | `where.not` with polymorphic association is partly fixed incidentally at 213796f (refer #33493, #26207, #17010, #16983, #14161), and I've added test case e9ba12f to avoid lose that fix accidentally in the future. In Rails 5.2, `where.not(polymorphic: object)` works as expected as NAND, but `where.not(polymorphic_type: object.class.polymorphic_name, polymorphic_id: object.id)` still unexpectedly works as NOR. To will make `where.not` working desiredly as NAND in Rails 6.1, this deprecates `where.not` working as NOR. If people want to continue NOR conditions, we'd encourage to them to `where.not` each conditions manually. ```ruby all = [treasures(:diamond), treasures(:sapphire), cars(:honda), treasures(:sapphire)] assert_equal all, PriceEstimate.all.map(&:estimate_of) ``` In Rails 6.0: ```ruby sapphire = treasures(:sapphire) nor = all.reject { |e| e.estimate_of_type == sapphire.class.polymorphic_name }.reject { |e| e.estimate_of_id == sapphire.id } assert_equal [cars(:honda)], nor without_sapphire = PriceEstimate.where.not( estimate_of_type: sapphire.class.polymorphic_name, estimate_of_id: sapphire.id ) assert_equal nor, without_sapphire.map(&:estimate_of) ``` In Rails 6.1: ```ruby sapphire = treasures(:sapphire) nand = all - [sapphire] assert_equal [treasures(:diamond), cars(:honda)], nand without_sapphire = PriceEstimate.where.not( estimate_of_type: sapphire.class.polymorphic_name, estimate_of_id: sapphire.id ) assert_equal nand, without_sapphire.map(&:estimate_of) ``` Resolves #31209.
* | | PERF: 20% faster pk attribute accessRyuta Kamizono2019-04-221-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I've realized that `user.id` is 20% slower than `user.name` in the benchmark (https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/35987#issuecomment-483882480). The reason that performance difference is that `self.class.primary_key` method call is a bit slow. Avoiding that method call will make almost attribute access faster and `user.id` will be completely the same performance with `user.name`. Before (02b5b8cb): ``` Warming up -------------------------------------- user.id 140.535k i/100ms user['id'] 96.549k i/100ms user.name 158.110k i/100ms user['name'] 94.507k i/100ms user.changed? 19.003k i/100ms user.saved_changes? 25.404k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- user.id 2.231M (± 0.9%) i/s - 11.243M in 5.040066s user['id'] 1.310M (± 1.3%) i/s - 6.565M in 5.012607s user.name 2.683M (± 1.2%) i/s - 13.439M in 5.009392s user['name'] 1.322M (± 0.9%) i/s - 6.615M in 5.003239s user.changed? 201.999k (±10.9%) i/s - 1.007M in 5.091195s user.saved_changes? 258.214k (±17.1%) i/s - 1.245M in 5.007421s ``` After (this change): ``` Warming up -------------------------------------- user.id 158.364k i/100ms user['id'] 106.412k i/100ms user.name 158.644k i/100ms user['name'] 107.518k i/100ms user.changed? 19.082k i/100ms user.saved_changes? 24.886k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- user.id 2.768M (± 1.1%) i/s - 13.936M in 5.034957s user['id'] 1.507M (± 2.1%) i/s - 7.555M in 5.017211s user.name 2.727M (± 1.5%) i/s - 13.643M in 5.004766s user['name'] 1.521M (± 1.3%) i/s - 7.634M in 5.018321s user.changed? 200.865k (±11.1%) i/s - 992.264k in 5.044868s user.saved_changes? 269.652k (±10.5%) i/s - 1.344M in 5.077972s ```
* | | Revert "Deprecate `collection_cache_key` which is private API"Ryuta Kamizono2019-04-191-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit f656bb301a43fe441af0039e4fafe40a7faa62f8. Reason: Test in Action View expects the `collection_cache_key` working... https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/ff6b713f5e729859995f204093ad3f8e08f39ea8/actionview/test/activerecord/relation_cache_test.rb#L21 https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/ff6b713f5e729859995f204093ad3f8e08f39ea8/actionview/test/fixtures/project.rb#L6 https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/60609#d19181fb-fe80-4d1e-891c-1109b540fb4b/981-1009