| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We sometimes say "✂️ newline after `private`" in a code review (e.g.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/18546#discussion_r23188776,
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/34832#discussion_r244847195).
Now `Layout/EmptyLinesAroundAccessModifier` cop have new enforced style
`EnforcedStyle: only_before` (https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/7059).
That cop and enforced style will reduce the our code review cost.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to avoid double assignments of nested_attributes for `has_many`
relations during record initialization, nested_attributes in `create_with`
should not be passed into `klass.new` and have them populate during
`initialize_internals_callback` with scope attributes.
However, `create_with` keys should always have precedence over where
clauses, so if there are same keys in both `create_with` and
`where_values_hash`, the value in `create_with` should be the one that's
used.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
What?
From now on when `accepts_nested_attributes_for` defined and `extend` option
added the overwritten `build` method being called.
[Alireza Bashiri, Martins Polakovs]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We sometimes ask "✂️ extra blank lines" to a contributor in reviews like
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/33337#discussion_r201509738.
It is preferable to deal automatically without depending on manpower.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This autocorrects the violations after adding a custom cop in
3305c78dcd.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing
changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
A collection association will raise on `#create_association` when the parent is
unpersisted. A singular association should do the same. This addresses
issue #29219.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Style/SpaceBeforeBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideHashLiteralBraces
Fix all violations in the repository.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Hash syntax auto-correcting breaks alignments. 411ccbdab2608c62aabdb320d52cb02d446bb39c
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
| |
|
|
| |
`send` is unnecessary.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Corrects an incorrect exception message when using accepts_nested_attributes_for
- Removes rescue/reraise behavior introduced in #19077
- Adds has_many & has_one, nested_attributes test case specifying the message that
should be conveyed with an exception raised because one of the nested attributes provided is unknown
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When updating an associated record via nested attribute hashes the
reject_if proc could be bypassed if the _destroy flag was set in the
attribute hash and allow_destroy was set to false.
The fix is to only short-circuit if the _destroy flag is set and the
option allow_destroy is set to true. It also fixes an issue where
a new record wasn't created if _destroy was set and the option
allow_destroy was set to false.
CVE-2015-7577
|
| |
|
|
| |
Add AC::Parameters tests for WhereChain#not
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
collection associations
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since nested hashes are also instances of
`ActionController::Parameters`, and we're explicitly looking to work
with a hash for nested attributes, this caused breakage in several
points.
This is the minimum viable fix for the issue (and one that I'm not
terribly fond of). I can't think of a better place to handle this at the
moment. I'd prefer to use some sort of solution that doesn't special
case AC::Parameters, but we can't use something like `to_h` or `to_a`
since `Enumerable` adds both.
While I've added a trivial test case for verifying this fix in
isolation, we really need better integration coverage to prevent
regressions like this in the future. We don't actually have a lot of
great places for integration coverage at the moment, so I'm deferring it
for now.
Fixes #20922.
|
| |
|
|
| |
tampering attacks.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I’m renaming all instances of `use_transcational_fixtures` to
`use_transactional_tests` and “transactional fixtures” to
“transactional tests”.
I’m deprecating `use_transactional_fixtures=`. So anyone who is
explicitly setting this will get a warning telling them to use
`use_transactional_tests=` instead.
I’m maintaining backwards compatibility—both forms will work.
`use_transactional_tests` will check to see if
`use_transactional_fixtures` is set and use that, otherwise it will use
itself. But because `use_transactional_tests` is a class attribute
(created with `class_attribute`) this requires a little bit of hoop
jumping. The writer method that `class_attribute` generates defines a
new reader method that return the value being set. Which means we can’t
set the default of `true` using `use_transactional_tests=` as was done
previously because that won’t take into account anyone using
`use_transactional_fixtures`. Instead I defined the reader method
manually and it checks `use_transactional_fixtures`. If it was set then
it should be used, otherwise it should return the default, which is
`true`. If someone uses `use_transactional_tests=` then it will
overwrite the backwards-compatible method with whatever they set.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The name `ActiveModel::AttributeAssignment::UnknownAttributeError` is
too implementation specific so let's move the constant directly under
the ActiveModel namespace.
Also since this constant used to be under the ActiveRecord namespace, to
make the upgrade path easier, let's avoid raising the former constant
when we deal with this error on the Active Record side.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Collection associations would have already been validated, but singular
associations were not.
Fixes #18735.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These callbacks will already have been defined when the association was
built. The check against `reflection.autosave` happens at call time, not
at define time, so simply modifying the reflection is sufficient.
Fixes #18704
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
`ActiveModel::AttributesAssignment`
Allows to use it for any object as an includable module.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
assert_raise + assert_equal on the returned exception message work
just fine, there is no need for extra work, specially like this overly
complicated helper.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow-Up to https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/14348
Ensure that SQLCounter.clear_log is called after each test.
This is a step to prevent side effects when running tests. This will allow us to run them in random order.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
recreate the models without mucking with internal caches of the relation
objects, then the test fails.
For example:
class Man < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :interests
end
class Interest < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :man
end
Then do this test:
def test_validate_presence_of_parent_fails_without_inverse_of
repair_validations(Interest) do
Interest.validates_presence_of(:man)
assert_no_difference ['Man.count', 'Interest.count'] do
man = Man.create(:name => 'John',
:interests_attributes => [{:topic=>'Cars'}, {:topic=>'Sports'}])
assert_not_predicate man.errors[:"interests.man"], :empty?
end
end
end
The test will fail. This is a bad test, so I am removing it.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
the results. Added tests to check to make sure that inverse associations are
automatically found when has_many, has_one, or belongs_to associations
are defined.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
assignment
For one-to-one nested associations, if you build the new (in-memory)
child object yourself before assignment, then the NestedAttributes
module will not overwrite it, e.g.:
class Member < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :avatar
accepts_nested_attributes_for :avatar
def avatar
super || build_avatar(width: 200)
end
end
member = Member.new
member.avatar_attributes = {icon: 'sad'}
member.avatar.width # => 200
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Introduce test on Error#full_message for attribute with underscores; Fix
some typos
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Also refactor the test a bit.
|
| | |
|
