| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was passing prior to 20b177b78ef5d21c8cc255f0376f6b2e948de234,
because we were not properly applying our contract that
`model.attr == model.tap(&:save).reload.attr` for this case. Now that
that has been resolved, this test is invalid on some adapters
|
|
|
|
| |
They didn't help.
|
|
|
|
| |
Nobody can replicate locally and the failure makes no sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When I originally reviewed the #20317, I believe these changes were
present, but it appears that it was later updated so that they were
removed. Since Travis hadn't re-run the build, this slipped through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a getter has side effects on the DB, `changes_applied` will be called
twice. The second time will try and remove the changed attributes cache,
and will crash because it's already been unset. This also demonstrates
that we shouldn't assume that calling getters won't change the value of
`changed_attributes`, and we need to clear the cache if an attribute is
modified.
Fixes #20531.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a usability change to fix a quirk from our definition of partial
writes. By default, we only persist changed attributes. When creating a
new record, this is assumed that the default values came from the
database. However, if the user provided a default, it will not be
persisted, since we didn't see it as "changed". Since this is a very
specific case, I wanted to isolate it with the other quirks that come
from user provided default values. The number of edge cases which are
presenting themselves are starting to make me wonder if we should just
remove the ability to assign a default, in favor of overriding
`initialize`. For the time being, this is required for the attributes
API to not have confusing behavior.
We had to delete one test, since this actually changes the meaning of
`.changed?` on Active Record models. It now specifically means
`changed_from_database?`. While I think this will make the attributes
API more ergonomic to use, it is a subtle change in definition (though
not a backwards incompatible one). We should probably figure out the
right place to document this. (Feel free to open a PR doing that if
you're reading this).
/cc @rafaelfranca @kirs @senny
This is an alternate implementation of #19921.
Close #19921.
[Sean Griffin & Kir Shatrov]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This helper no longer makes sense as a separate method. Instead I'll
just have `deserialize` call `cast` by default. This led to a random
infinite loop in the `JSON` pg type, when it called `super` from
`deserialize`. Not really a great way to fix that other than not calling
super, or continuing to have the separate method, which makes the public
API differ from what we say it is.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The same is not true of `define_attribute`, which is meant to be the low
level no-magic API that sits underneath. The differences between the two
APIs are:
- `attribute`
- Lazy (the attribute will be defined after the schema has loaded)
- Allows either a type object or a symbol
- `define_attribute`
- Runs immediately (might get trampled by schema loading)
- Requires a type object
This was the last blocker in terms of public interface requirements
originally discussed for this feature back in May. All the
implementation blockers have been cleared, so this feature is probably
ready for release (pending one more look-over by me).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When an attribute is assigned, we determine if it was already marked as
changed so we can determine if we need to clear the changes, or mark it
as changed. Since this only affects the `attributes_changed_by_setter`
hash, in-place changes are irrelevant to this process. Since calculating
in-place changes can be expensive, we can just skip it here.
I also added a test for the only edge case I could think of that would
be affected by this change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This sets a precident for how we handle `attribute` calls, which aren't
backed by a database column. We should not take this as a conscious
decision on how to handle them, and this can change when we make
`attribute` public if we have better ideas in the future.
As the composed attributes API gets fleshed out, I expect the
`persistable_attributes` method to change to
`@attributes.select(&:persistable).keys`, or some more performant
variant there-of. This can probably go away completely once we fully
move dirty checking into the attribute objects once it gets moved up to
Active Model.
Fixes #18407
|
|
|
|
| |
`ActiveModel::Dirty#reset_changes`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This showed up when running BinaryTest#test_load_save with the more
restrictive input string handling of pg-0.18.0.pre20141117110243.gem .
Bytea values sent to the server are in binary format, but are
returned back as escaped text. To fulfill the assumption that
type_cast_from_database(type_cast_for_database(binary)) == binary
we unescape only, if the value was really received from the server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Calling `changed_attributes` will ultimately check if every mutable
attribute has changed in place. Since this gets called whenever an
attribute is assigned, it's extremely slow. Instead, we can avoid this
calculation until we actually need it.
Fixes #18029
|
|
|
|
| |
This test would fail when executed after any test that calls fixtures(:binaries)
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #16701
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These methods may cause confusion with the `reset_changes` that
behaves differently
of them.
Also rename undo_changes to restore_changes to match this new set of
methods.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have several mutable types on Active Record now. (Serialized, JSON,
HStore). We need to be able to detect if these have been modified in
place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- The following is now true for all types, all the time
- `model.attribute_before_type_cast == given_value`
- `model.attribute == model.save_and_reload.attribute`
- `model.attribute == model.dup.attribute`
- `model.attribute == YAML.load(YAML.dump(model)).attribute`
- Removes the remaining types implementing `type_cast_for_write`
- Simplifies the implementation of time zone aware attributes
- Brings tz aware attributes closer to being implemented as an attribute
decorator
- Adds additional point of control for custom types
|
|
|
|
| |
For consistency with https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/15557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The contract of `_field_changed?` assumes that the old value is always
type cast. That is not the case for the value in `Column#default` as
things are today. It appears there are other public methods that
assume that `Column#default` is type cast, as well. The reason for this
change originally was because the value gets put into `@raw_attributes`
in initialize. This reverts to the old behavior on `Column`, and updates
`initialize` to make sure that the values are in the right format.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removed deprecated methods `partial_updates`, `partial_updates?` and
`partial_updates=`
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, when `time_zone_aware_attributes` were enabled, after
changing a datetime or timestamp attribute and then changing it back
to the original value, `changed_attributes` still tracked the
attribute as changed. This caused `[attribute]_changed?` and
`changed?` methods to return true incorrectly.
Example:
in_time_zone 'Paris' do
order = Order.new
original_time = Time.local(2012, 10, 10)
order.shipped_at = original_time
order.save
order.changed? # => false
# changing value
order.shipped_at = Time.local(2013, 1, 1)
order.changed? # => true
# reverting to original value
order.shipped_at = original_time
order.changed? # => false, used to return true
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit e9d2ad395ec2ef929d74752f3d71c80674044fbe.
Closes #8460
Conflicts:
activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods/time_zone_conversion.rb
activerecord/test/cases/dirty_test.rb
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a test case to ensure that fractional second updates are detected.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 637a7d9d357a0f3f725b0548282ca8c5e7d4af4a, reversing
changes made to 5937bd02dee112646469848d7fe8a8bfcef5b4c1.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They was extracted from a plugin.
See https://github.com/rails/rails-observers
[Rafael Mendonça França + Steve Klabnik]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Setting a nil datetime attribute to a blank string should not cause the
attribute to be dirty.
Fix #8310
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reflects the fact that it now impact inserts as well as updates.
|
|
|
|
| |
because Oracle adapter uses upper case attribute/column name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When inserting new records, only the fields which have been changed
from the defaults will actually be included in the INSERT statement.
The other fields will be populated by the database.
This is more efficient, and also means that it will be safe to
remove database columns without getting subsequent errors in running
app processes (so long as the code in those processes doesn't
contain any references to the removed column).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit a7f4b0a1231bf3c65db2ad4066da78c3da5ffb01.
Conflicts:
activerecord/lib/active_record/associations/has_one_association.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/persistence.rb
activerecord/test/cases/base_test.rb
activerecord/test/cases/dirty_test.rb
activerecord/test/cases/timestamp_test.rb
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
zero and the new value is not a string.
Before this commit this was the behavior
r = Review.find_by_issue(0)
r.issue
=> 0
r.changes
=> {}
r.issue = 0
=> 0
r.changed?
=> true
r.changes
=> {"issue"=>[0,0]}
Fixes #7237
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #1190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before 7f4b0a1231bf3c65db2ad4066da78c3da5ffb01, this test are asserting
that update_attribute does the dirty tracking. Since we remove this
method and update_column write in the database directly this tests will
always fail>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Historically, update_attribute and update_attributes are similar, but
with one big difference: update_attribute does not run validations.
These two methods are really easy to confuse given their similar
names. Therefore, update_attribute is being removed in favor of
update_column.
See the thread on rails-core here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/rubyonrails-core/BWPUTK7WvYA
|