| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #36581.
This fixes an issue where validations would return differently when a previously saved invalid association was loaded between calls:
assert_equal true, squeak.valid?
assert_equal true, squeak.mouse.present?
assert_equal true, squeak.valid?
Here the second assert would return
Expected: true
Actual: false
Limiting validations to associations that would be normally saved (using autosave: true) due to changes means that loading invalid associated relations will not change the return value of the parent relations's `valid?` method.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
vishaltelangre/raise-record-invalid-when-associations-fail-to-save-due-to-uniqueness-failure
Fix: ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid is not raised when an associated record fails to #save! due to uniqueness validation failure
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
fails to #save! due to uniqueness validation failure
Add tests
Fix tests failing due to introduction of uniquness rule added to Book model
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We sometimes say "✂️ newline after `private`" in a code review (e.g.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/18546#discussion_r23188776,
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/34832#discussion_r244847195).
Now `Layout/EmptyLinesAroundAccessModifier` cop have new enforced style
`EnforcedStyle: only_before` (https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/7059).
That cop and enforced style will reduce the our code review cost.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Model error as object
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
autosave duplicate errors can be removed
See SHA 7550f0a016ee6647aaa76c0c0ae30bebc3867288
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/|
| | |
Fix "autosave: true" on belongs_to of join model causes invalid records to be saved
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Use a variable local to the `save_collection_association` method in
`activerecord/lib/active_record/autosave_association.rb`, instead of an
instance variable.
Prior to this PR, when there was a circular series of `autosave: true`
associations, the callback for a `has_many` association was run while
another instance of the same callback on the same association hadn't
finished running. When control returned to the first instance of the
callback, the instance variable had changed, and subsequent associated
records weren't saved correctly. Specifically, the ID field for the
`belongs_to` corresponding to the `has_many` was `nil`.
Remove unnecessary test and comments.
Fixes #28080.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes #35680
The problem occurred, when a `has one through` association contains
a foreign key (it belongs to the intermediate association).
For example, Comment belongs to Post, Post belongs to Author, and Author
`has_one :first_comment, through: :first_post`.
In this case, the value of the foreign key is comparing with the original
record, and since they are likely different, the association is marked
as changed. So it updates every time when the origin record updates.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Allow subclasses to redefine autosave callbacks for associated records
|
| |/ |
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
| |
- Fixes #32940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Rollback parent transaction when children fails to update
Rails supports autosave associations on the owner of a `has_many`
relationship. In certain situation, if the children of the association
fail to save, the parent is not rolled back.
```ruby
class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many(:employees)
end
company = Company.new
employee = company.employees.new
company.save
```
In the previous example, if the Employee failed to save, the Company
will not be rolled back. It will remain in the database with no
associated Employee.
I expect the `company.save` call to be atomic, and either create all or
none of the records.
The persistance of the Company already starts a transaction that nests
it's children. However, it didn't track the success or failure of it's
children in this very situation, and the outermost transaction is not
rolled back.
This PR makes the change to track the success of the child insertion and
rollback the parent if any of the children fail.
* Change the test to reflect what we expect
Once #32862 is merged, rolling back a record will rollback it's state to match
the state before the database changes were applied
* Use only the public API to express the tests
* Refactor to avoid reassigning saved for nested reflections
[Guillaume Malette + Rafael Mendonça França]
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Record saved in save_has_one_association already make call to association.loaded! via record's before_save callback of save_belongs_to_association,
but this will reload object if accessed in record's validation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing
changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
kamipo/remove_returning_true_in_internal_callbacks
Remove returning true in internal callbacks
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`display_deprecation_warning_for_false_terminator` was removed since
3a25cdc.
|
|/
|
|
|
| |
Since 86390c3 all associations have `reset_scope` so `respond_to?` is
unneeded.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #24032
|
|
|
|
| |
Actually, private methods cannot be called with `self.`, so it's not just redundant, it's a bad habit in Ruby
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
callbacks
We pretty frequently get bug reports that "dirty is broken inside of
after callbacks". Intuitively they are correct. You'd expect
`Model.after_save { puts changed? }; model.save` to do the same thing as
`model.save; puts model.changed?`, but it does not.
However, changing this goes much farther than just making the behavior
more intuitive. There are a _ton_ of places inside of AR that can be
drastically simplified with this change. Specifically, autosave
associations, timestamps, touch, counter cache, and just about anything
else in AR that works with callbacks have code to try to avoid "double
save" bugs which we will be able to flat out remove with this change.
We introduce two new sets of methods, both with names that are meant to
be more explicit than dirty. The first set maintains the old behavior,
and their names are meant to center that they are about changes that
occurred during the save that just happened. They are equivalent to
`previous_changes` when called outside of after callbacks, or once the
deprecation cycle moves.
The second set is the new behavior. Their names imply that they are
talking about changes from the database representation. The fact that
this is what we really care about became clear when looking at
`BelongsTo.touch_record` when tests were failing. I'm unsure that this
set of methods should be in the public API. Outside of after callbacks,
they are equivalent to the existing methods on dirty.
Dirty itself is not deprecated, nor are the methods inside of it. They
will only emit the warning when called inside of after callbacks. The
scope of this breakage is pretty large, but the migration path is
simple. Given how much this can improve our codebase, and considering
that it makes our API more intuitive, I think it's worth doing.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the association is autosaved we were storing the details with
string keys. This was creating inconsistency with other details that are
added using the `Errors#add` method. It was also inconsistent with the
`Errors#messages` storage.
To fix this inconsistency we are always storing with symbols. This will
cause a small breaking change because in those cases the details could
be accessed as strings keys but now it can not.
The reason that we chose to do this breaking change is because `#details`
should be considered a low level object like `#messages` is.
Fix #26499.
[Rafael Mendonça França + Marcus Vieira]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, if the the association was previously loaded and then
the foreign key changed by itself, a #save call would trigger a
load of the new associated record during autosave. This is unnecessary
and the autosave code (in that case) didn't use the loaded record
anyways.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Errors can be indexed with nested attributes
Close #8638
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`has_many` can now take `index_errors: true` as an
option. When this is enabled, errors for nested models will be
returned alongside an index, as opposed to just the nested model name.
This option can also be enabled (or disabled) globally through
`ActiveRecord::Base.index_nested_attribute_errors`
E.X.
```ruby
class Guitar < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :tuning_pegs
accepts_nested_attributes_for :tuning_pegs
end
class TuningPeg < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :guitar
validates_numericality_of :pitch
end
```
- Old style
- `guitar.errors["tuning_pegs.pitch"] = ["is not a number"]`
- New style (if defined globally, or set in has_many_relationship)
- `guitar.errors["tuning_pegs[1].pitch"] = ["is not a number"]`
[Michael Probber, Terence Sun]
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The focus of this change is to make the API more accessible.
References to method and classes should be linked to make it easy to
navigate around.
This patch makes exzessiv use of `rdoc-ref:` to provide more readable
docs. This makes it possible to document `ActiveRecord::Base#save` even
though the method is within a separate module
`ActiveRecord::Persistence`. The goal here is to bring the API closer to
the actual code that you would write.
This commit only deals with Active Record. The other gems will be
updated accordingly but in different commits. The pass through Active
Record is not completely finished yet. A follow up commit will change
the spots I haven't yet had the time to update.
/cc @fxn
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
[ci skip]
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As per the docs, `mark_for_destruction` should do nothing if `autosave`
is not set to true. We normally persist associations on a record no
matter what if the record is a new record, but we were always skipping
records which were `marked_for_destruction?`.
Fixes #20882
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This code is so fucked. Things that cause this bug not to replicate:
- Defining the validation before the association (we end up calling
`uniq!` on the errors in the autosave validation)
- Adding `accepts_nested_attributes_for` (I have no clue why. The only
thing it does that should affect this is adds `autosave: true` to the
inverse reflection, and doing that manually doesn't fix this).
This solution is a hack, and I'm almost certain there's a better way to
go about it, but this shouldn't cause a huge hit on validation times,
and is the simplest way to get it done.
Fixes #20874.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Collection associations would have already been validated, but singular
associations were not.
Fixes #18735.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When associations checked for autosave have a cycle, and
none of them is dirty, then changed_for_autosave? will be an
infinite loop. We now remember if we're in the check and
will short circuit the recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before this commit, returning `false` in an ActiveRecord `before_` callback
such as `before_create` would halt the callback chain.
After this commit, the behavior is deprecated: will still work until
the next release of Rails but will also display a deprecation warning.
The preferred way to halt a callback chain is to explicitly `throw(:abort)`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After this commit, returning `false` in a callback will display a deprecation
warning to make developers aware of the fact that they need to explicitly
`throw(:abort)` if their intention is to halt a callback chain.
This commit also patches two internal uses of AS::Callbacks (inside
ActiveRecord and ActionDispatch) which sometimes return `false` but whose
returned value is not meaningful for the purpose of execution.
In both cases, the returned value is set to `true`, which does not affect the
execution of the callbacks but prevents unrequested deprecation warnings from
showing up.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
068f092ced8483e557725542dd919ab7c516e567 registered autosave callbacks
as `after_save` callbacks. This caused the regression described in #17209.
Autosave callbacks should be registered as `after_update` and
`after_create` callbacks, just like before.
This is a partial revert of 068f092ced8483e557725542dd919ab7c516e567.
Fixes #17209.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Callback order in Active Record objects are important. Users should not
define callbacks before the association definition or surprising
behaviours like the described at #3798 will happen. This callback order
dependency is documented at https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/31bfcdc77ca0d8cec9b5fe513bdc6f05814dd4f1/activerecord/lib/active_record/associations.rb#L1222-1227.
This reverts #15728.
Fixes #16620.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the through record gets created in an `after_create` hook that is
defined before the association is defined (therefore after its
`after_create` hook) get saved twice. This ensures that the through
records are created only once, regardless of the order of the hooks.
|