Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Improve Validation Helpers' documentation comments and tests | Radan Skoric | 2015-06-27 | 1 | -0/+17 |
| | |||||
* | Removed magic comments # encoding: utf-8 , since its default from ruby 2.0 ↵ | Vipul A M | 2015-02-03 | 1 | -1/+0 |
| | | | | onwards. | ||||
* | Use the new clear_validators! api to reset validators in tests | Carlos Antonio da Silva | 2014-01-27 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | |||||
* | Convert ActiveModel to 1.9 hash syntax. | Patrick Robertson | 2013-05-01 | 1 | -6/+6 |
| | | | | | I also attempted to fix other styleguide violations such as { a: :b } over {a: :b} and foo(b: 'bar') over foo( b: 'bar' ). | ||||
* | Fix method redefined warnings. | kennyj | 2012-08-29 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| | |||||
* | Accept a symbol for `:in` option on inclusion and exclusion validators | Gabriel Sobrinho | 2012-08-24 | 1 | -0/+22 |
| | |||||
* | `validates_inclusion_of` and `validates_exclusion_of` now accept | Rafael Mendonça França | 2012-07-20 | 1 | -0/+10 |
| | | | | | | `:within` option as alias of `:in` as documented. Fix #7118 | ||||
* | Update variable's name in the test case to reflect the class we're testing | Prem Sichanugrist | 2011-11-18 | 1 | -6/+6 |
| | |||||
* | No need to rescue here. Invoking the wrong method in an object can happen ↵ | José Valim | 2011-04-11 | 1 | -9/+0 |
| | | | | anywhere if you are not careful. In other words, test your shit. | ||||
* | Revert "Add :use_include option to allow user to explicitly use ↵ | José Valim | 2011-04-11 | 1 | -10/+0 |
| | | | | | | | | `Range#include?` method in Ruby 1.9" Use :with => range.to_a instead. This reverts commit f6540211b5b9133c9f93c11655a04d613c237e67. | ||||
* | Add :use_include option to allow user to explicitly use `Range#include?` ↵ | Prem Sichanugrist | 2011-04-10 | 1 | -0/+10 |
| | | | | | | method in Ruby 1.9 In Ruby 1.9 we're currently use `Range#cover?` to fix the performance problem. However, there might be the case that you want to use `Range#include?` instead. This patch will give you that option. | ||||
* | Add support for proc or lambda as an option for InclusionValidator, ↵ | Prem Sichanugrist | 2011-04-10 | 1 | -0/+21 |
| | | | | | | ExclusionValidator, and FormatValidator You can now use a proc or lambda in :in option for InclusionValidator and ExclusionValidator, and :with, :without option for FormatValidator | ||||
* | removed AR from all AMo tests, including any unneeded files (schema, ↵ | Josh Kalderimis | 2010-05-09 | 1 | -2/+0 |
| | | | | fixtures and test helper) | ||||
* | removed use of AR in AMo tests and removed testing of scopes (:on) in ↵ | Josh Kalderimis | 2010-05-08 | 1 | -5/+5 |
| | | | | individual validation tests and moved them to their own test file | ||||
* | Favor %{} in all code instead of (deprecated) {{}} as interpolation syntax ↵ | Lawrence Pit | 2010-05-03 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | for I18n Signed-off-by: José Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com> | ||||
* | No need to use ValidationsRepairHelper hack on ActiveModel anymore, ↵ | José Valim | 2009-12-23 | 1 | -11/+12 |
| | | | | Model.reset_callbacks(:validate) is enough. However, tests in ActiveRecord are still coupled, so moved ValidationsRepairHelper back there. | ||||
* | Add ActiveModel::Validations tests for regular ruby classes | Pratik Naik | 2009-03-20 | 1 | -0/+16 |
| | |||||
* | Deprecate Error#on(attribute) in favour of Errors#[attribute] | Pratik Naik | 2009-03-20 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | TestDatabase -> TestsDatabase | Pratik Naik | 2009-03-20 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | Move relevant validation tests from Active Record to Active Model | Pratik Naik | 2009-03-20 | 1 | -0/+30 |