aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/activemodel/test/cases/validations/exclusion_validation_test.rb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPrem Sichanugrist <s@sikachu.com>2011-04-10 15:39:01 +0800
committerJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>2011-04-10 18:49:28 +0800
commitf6540211b5b9133c9f93c11655a04d613c237e67 (patch)
treefda530dfc1f19d834bd1a638f55366be267b76da /activemodel/test/cases/validations/exclusion_validation_test.rb
parent58594be680e8712c9e7352f184e15972d02cd4af (diff)
downloadrails-f6540211b5b9133c9f93c11655a04d613c237e67.tar.gz
rails-f6540211b5b9133c9f93c11655a04d613c237e67.tar.bz2
rails-f6540211b5b9133c9f93c11655a04d613c237e67.zip
Add :use_include option to allow user to explicitly use `Range#include?` method in Ruby 1.9
In Ruby 1.9 we're currently use `Range#cover?` to fix the performance problem. However, there might be the case that you want to use `Range#include?` instead. This patch will give you that option.
Diffstat (limited to 'activemodel/test/cases/validations/exclusion_validation_test.rb')
-rw-r--r--activemodel/test/cases/validations/exclusion_validation_test.rb10
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/activemodel/test/cases/validations/exclusion_validation_test.rb b/activemodel/test/cases/validations/exclusion_validation_test.rb
index fe0d13ec33..e1807a3f34 100644
--- a/activemodel/test/cases/validations/exclusion_validation_test.rb
+++ b/activemodel/test/cases/validations/exclusion_validation_test.rb
@@ -63,4 +63,14 @@ class ExclusionValidationTest < ActiveModel::TestCase
p.author_name = "sikachu"
assert_raise(ArgumentError){ p.valid? }
end
+
+ def test_validates_inclusion_with_explicit_include
+ range = (1..100)
+ Topic.validates_exclusion_of :title, :in => range, :use_include => true
+ range.expects(:include?).returns(false)
+
+ t = Topic.new
+ t.title = 102
+ assert t.valid?
+ end
end