diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'guides')
| -rw-r--r-- | guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.md | 10 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | guides/source/getting_started.md | 16 |
2 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.md b/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.md index 90c83a5e05..18fca59ca4 100644 --- a/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.md +++ b/guides/source/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.md @@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ NOTE: Bugs in the most recent released version of Ruby on Rails are likely to ge ### Creating a Bug Report -If you've found a problem in Ruby on Rails which is not a security risk, do a search in GitHub under [Issues](https://github.com/rails/rails/issues) in case it was already reported. If you find no issue addressing it you can [add a new one](https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/new). (See the next section for reporting security issues.) +If you've found a problem in Ruby on Rails which is not a security risk, do a search in GitHub under [Issues](https://github.com/rails/rails/issues) in case it has already been reported. If you do not find any issue addressing it you may proceed to [open a new one](https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/new). (See the next section for reporting security issues.) -At the minimum, your issue report needs a title and descriptive text. But that's only a minimum. You should include as much relevant information as possible. You need at least to post the code sample that has the issue. Even better is to include a unit test that shows how the expected behavior is not occurring. Your goal should be to make it easy for yourself - and others - to replicate the bug and figure out a fix. +Your issue report should contain a title and a clear description of the issue at the bare minimum. You should include as much relevant information as possible and should at least post a code sample that demonstrates the issue. It would be even better if you could include a unit test that shows how the expected behavior is not occurring. Your goal should be to make it easy for yourself - and others - to replicate the bug and figure out a fix. Then, don't get your hopes up! Unless you have a "Code Red, Mission Critical, the World is Coming to an End" kind of bug, you're creating this issue report in the hope that others with the same problem will be able to collaborate with you on solving it. Do not expect that the issue report will automatically see any activity or that others will jump to fix it. Creating an issue like this is mostly to help yourself start on the path of fixing the problem and for others to confirm it with an "I'm having this problem too" comment. @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ The CHANGELOG is an important part of every release. It keeps the list of change You should add an entry to the CHANGELOG of the framework that you modified if you're adding or removing a feature, committing a bug fix or adding deprecation notices. Refactorings and documentation changes generally should not go to the CHANGELOG. -A CHANGELOG entry should summarize what was changed and should end with author's name and it should go on top of a CHANGELOG. You can use multiple lines if you need more space and you can attach code examples indented with 4 spaces. If a change is related to a specific issue, you should attach issue's number. Here is an example CHANGELOG entry: +A CHANGELOG entry should summarize what was changed and should end with author's name and it should go on top of a CHANGELOG. You can use multiple lines if you need more space and you can attach code examples indented with 4 spaces. If a change is related to a specific issue, you should attach the issue's number. Here is an example CHANGELOG entry: ``` * Summary of a change that briefly describes what was changed. You can use multiple @@ -475,11 +475,11 @@ the same way that you appreciate feedback on your patches. ### Iterate as Necessary -It's entirely possible that the feedback you get will suggest changes. Don't get discouraged: the whole point of contributing to an active open source project is to tap into community knowledge. If people are encouraging you to tweak your code, then it's worth making the tweaks and resubmitting. If the feedback is that your code doesn't belong in the core, you might still think about releasing it as a gem. +It's entirely possible that the feedback you get will suggest changes. Don't get discouraged: the whole point of contributing to an active open source project is to tap into the knowledge of the community. If people are encouraging you to tweak your code, then it's worth making the tweaks and resubmitting. If the feedback is that your code doesn't belong in the core, you might still think about releasing it as a gem. #### Squashing commits -One of the things that we may ask you to do is "squash your commits," which +One of the things that we may ask you to do is to "squash your commits", which will combine all of your commits into a single commit. We prefer pull requests that are a single commit. This makes it easier to backport changes to stable branches, squashing makes it easier to revert bad commits, and the git history diff --git a/guides/source/getting_started.md b/guides/source/getting_started.md index 542e402ca1..8966eef76a 100644 --- a/guides/source/getting_started.md +++ b/guides/source/getting_started.md @@ -1839,7 +1839,7 @@ database and send us back to the show action for the article. ### Deleting Associated Objects -If you delete an article then its associated comments will also need to be +If you delete an article, its associated comments will also need to be deleted. Otherwise they would simply occupy space in the database. Rails allows you to use the `dependent` option of an association to achieve this. Modify the Article model, `app/models/article.rb`, as follows: @@ -1857,21 +1857,21 @@ Security ### Basic Authentication -If you were to publish your blog online, anybody would be able to add, edit and +If you were to publish your blog online, anyone would be able to add, edit and delete articles or delete comments. Rails provides a very simple HTTP authentication system that will work nicely in this situation. -In the `ArticlesController` we need to have a way to block access to the various -actions if the person is not authenticated, here we can use the Rails -`http_basic_authenticate_with` method, allowing access to the requested +In the `ArticlesController` we need to have a way to block access to the +various actions if the person is not authenticated. Here we can use the Rails +`http_basic_authenticate_with` method, which allows access to the requested action if that method allows it. To use the authentication system, we specify it at the top of our -`ArticlesController`, in this case, we want the user to be authenticated on -every action, except for `index` and `show`, so we write that in -`app/controllers/articles_controller.rb`: +`ArticlesController` in `app/controllers/articles_controller.rb`. In our case, +we want the user to be authenticated on every action except `index` and `show`, +so we write that: ```ruby class ArticlesController < ApplicationController |