aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/activerecord/test/transactions_test.rb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'activerecord/test/transactions_test.rb')
-rw-r--r--activerecord/test/transactions_test.rb110
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/activerecord/test/transactions_test.rb b/activerecord/test/transactions_test.rb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..18b2ea3e65
--- /dev/null
+++ b/activerecord/test/transactions_test.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+require 'abstract_unit'
+require 'fixtures/topic'
+
+
+class TransactionTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
+ def setup
+ @topics = create_fixtures "topics"
+ @first, @second = Topic.find(1, 2)
+ end
+
+ def test_successful
+ Topic.transaction do
+ @first.approved = 1
+ @second.approved = 0
+ @first.save
+ @second.save
+ end
+
+ assert Topic.find(1).approved?, "First should have been approved"
+ assert !Topic.find(2).approved?, "Second should have been unapproved"
+ end
+
+ def test_successful_with_instance_method
+ @first.transaction do
+ @first.approved = 1
+ @second.approved = 0
+ @first.save
+ @second.save
+ end
+
+ assert Topic.find(1).approved?, "First should have been approved"
+ assert !Topic.find(2).approved?, "Second should have been unapproved"
+ end
+
+ def test_failing_on_exception
+ begin
+ Topic.transaction do
+ @first.approved = true
+ @second.approved = false
+ @first.save
+ @second.save
+ raise "Bad things!"
+ end
+ rescue
+ # caught it
+ end
+
+ assert @first.approved?, "First should still be changed in the objects"
+ assert !@second.approved?, "Second should still be changed in the objects"
+
+ assert !Topic.find(1).approved?, "First shouldn't have been approved"
+ assert Topic.find(2).approved?, "Second should still be approved"
+ end
+
+ def test_failing_with_object_rollback
+ begin
+ Topic.transaction(@first, @second) do
+ @first.approved = true
+ @second.approved = false
+ @first.save
+ @second.save
+ raise "Bad things!"
+ end
+ rescue
+ # caught it
+ end
+
+ assert !@first.approved?, "First shouldn't have been approved"
+ assert @second.approved?, "Second should still be approved"
+ end
+
+ def test_callback_rollback_in_save
+ add_exception_raising_after_save_callback_to_topic
+
+ begin
+ @first.approved = true
+ @first.save
+ flunk
+ rescue => e
+ assert_equal "Make the transaction rollback", e.message
+ assert !Topic.find(1).approved?
+ ensure
+ remove_exception_raising_after_save_callback_to_topic
+ end
+ end
+
+ def xtest_nested_explicit_transactions
+ Topic.transaction do
+ Topic.transaction do
+ @first.approved = 1
+ @second.approved = 0
+ @first.save
+ @second.save
+ end
+ end
+
+ assert Topic.find(1).approved?, "First should have been approved"
+ assert !Topic.find(2).approved?, "Second should have been unapproved"
+ end
+
+
+ private
+ def add_exception_raising_after_save_callback_to_topic
+ Topic.class_eval { def after_save() raise "Make the transaction rollback" end }
+ end
+
+ def remove_exception_raising_after_save_callback_to_topic
+ Topic.class_eval { remove_method :after_save }
+ end
+end