diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/CHANGELOG.md | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb | 26 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/lib/active_record/dynamic_matchers.rb | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/lib/active_record/enum.rb | 46 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/named.rb | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb | 59 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/test/cases/finder_respond_to_test.rb | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/test/cases/scoping/named_scoping_test.rb | 57 |
8 files changed, 219 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/activerecord/CHANGELOG.md b/activerecord/CHANGELOG.md index ddf5592a78..6226ce844f 100644 --- a/activerecord/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/activerecord/CHANGELOG.md @@ -1,3 +1,24 @@ +* `enum` now raises on "dangerous" name conflicts + + Dangerous name conflicts includes instance or class method conflicts + with methods defined within `ActiveRecord::Base` but not its ancestors, + as well as conflicts with methods generated by other enums on the same + class. + + Fixes #13389. + + *Godfrey Chan* + +* `scope` now raises on "dangerous" name conflicts + + Similar to dangerous attribute methods, a scope name conflict is + dangerous if it conflicts with an existing class method defined within + `ActiveRecord::Base` but not its ancestors. + + See also #13389. + + *Godfrey Chan*, *Philippe Creux* + * Correctly send an user provided statement to a `lock!()` call. person.lock! 'FOR SHARE NOWAIT' diff --git a/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb b/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb index 73761520f7..ccbff8d1ff 100644 --- a/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb +++ b/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb @@ -110,16 +110,34 @@ module ActiveRecord end end - # A method name is 'dangerous' if it is already defined by Active Record, but + # A method name is 'dangerous' if it is already (re)defined by Active Record, but # not by any ancestors. (So 'puts' is not dangerous but 'save' is.) def dangerous_attribute_method?(name) # :nodoc: method_defined_within?(name, Base) end - def method_defined_within?(name, klass, sup = klass.superclass) # :nodoc: + def method_defined_within?(name, klass, superklass = klass.superclass) # :nodoc: if klass.method_defined?(name) || klass.private_method_defined?(name) - if sup.method_defined?(name) || sup.private_method_defined?(name) - klass.instance_method(name).owner != sup.instance_method(name).owner + if superklass.method_defined?(name) || superklass.private_method_defined?(name) + klass.instance_method(name).owner != superklass.instance_method(name).owner + else + true + end + else + false + end + end + + # A class method is 'dangerous' if it is already (re)defined by Active Record, but + # not by any ancestors. (So 'puts' is not dangerous but 'new' is.) + def dangerous_class_method?(method_name) + class_method_defined_within?(method_name, Base) + end + + def class_method_defined_within?(name, klass, superklass = klass.superclass) # :nodoc + if klass.respond_to?(name, true) + if superklass.respond_to?(name, true) + klass.method(name).owner != superklass.method(name).owner else true end diff --git a/activerecord/lib/active_record/dynamic_matchers.rb b/activerecord/lib/active_record/dynamic_matchers.rb index 5caab09038..e94b74063e 100644 --- a/activerecord/lib/active_record/dynamic_matchers.rb +++ b/activerecord/lib/active_record/dynamic_matchers.rb @@ -6,8 +6,12 @@ module ActiveRecord # then we can remove the indirection. def respond_to?(name, include_private = false) - match = Method.match(self, name) - match && match.valid? || super + if self == Base + super + else + match = Method.match(self, name) + match && match.valid? || super + end end private diff --git a/activerecord/lib/active_record/enum.rb b/activerecord/lib/active_record/enum.rb index 53dde5e564..059bfe9a0f 100644 --- a/activerecord/lib/active_record/enum.rb +++ b/activerecord/lib/active_record/enum.rb @@ -77,10 +77,12 @@ module ActiveRecord name = name.to_sym # def self.statuses statuses end + detect_enum_conflict!(name, name.to_s.pluralize, true) klass.singleton_class.send(:define_method, name.to_s.pluralize) { enum_values } _enum_methods_module.module_eval do # def status=(value) self[:status] = statuses[value] end + klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, "#{name}=") define_method("#{name}=") { |value| if enum_values.has_key?(value) || value.blank? self[name] = enum_values[value] @@ -95,23 +97,28 @@ module ActiveRecord } # def status() statuses.key self[:status] end + klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, name) define_method(name) { enum_values.key self[name] } # def status_before_type_cast() statuses.key self[:status] end + klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, "#{name}_before_type_cast") define_method("#{name}_before_type_cast") { enum_values.key self[name] } pairs = values.respond_to?(:each_pair) ? values.each_pair : values.each_with_index pairs.each do |value, i| enum_values[value] = i - # scope :active, -> { where status: 0 } - klass.scope value, -> { klass.where name => i } - # def active?() status == 0 end + klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, "#{value}?") define_method("#{value}?") { self[name] == i } # def active!() update! status: :active end + klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, "#{value}!") define_method("#{value}!") { update! name => value } + + # scope :active, -> { where status: 0 } + klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, value, true) + klass.scope value, -> { klass.where name => i } end DEFINED_ENUMS[name.to_s] = enum_values @@ -148,5 +155,38 @@ module ActiveRecord mod end end + + ENUM_CONFLICT_MESSAGE = \ + "You tried to define an enum named \"%{enum}\" on the model \"%{klass}\", but " \ + "this will generate a %{type} method \"%{method}\", which is already defined " \ + "by %{source}." + + def detect_enum_conflict!(enum_name, method_name, klass_method = false) + if klass_method && dangerous_class_method?(method_name) + raise ArgumentError, ENUM_CONFLICT_MESSAGE % { + enum: enum_name, + klass: self.name, + type: 'class', + method: method_name, + source: 'Active Record' + } + elsif !klass_method && dangerous_attribute_method?(method_name) + raise ArgumentError, ENUM_CONFLICT_MESSAGE % { + enum: enum_name, + klass: self.name, + type: 'instance', + method: method_name, + source: 'Active Record' + } + elsif !klass_method && method_defined_within?(method_name, _enum_methods_module, Module) + raise ArgumentError, ENUM_CONFLICT_MESSAGE % { + enum: enum_name, + klass: self.name, + type: 'instance', + method: method_name, + source: 'another enum' + } + end + end end end diff --git a/activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/named.rb b/activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/named.rb index 2a5718f388..49cadb66d0 100644 --- a/activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/named.rb +++ b/activerecord/lib/active_record/scoping/named.rb @@ -139,6 +139,12 @@ module ActiveRecord # Article.published.featured.latest_article # Article.featured.titles def scope(name, body, &block) + if dangerous_class_method?(name) + raise ArgumentError, "You tried to define a scope named \"#{name}\" " \ + "on the model \"#{self.name}\", but Active Record already defined " \ + "a class method with the same name." + end + extension = Module.new(&block) if block singleton_class.send(:define_method, name) do |*args| diff --git a/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb b/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb index 8719f45e76..5cac630a3a 100644 --- a/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb +++ b/activerecord/test/cases/enum_test.rb @@ -163,4 +163,63 @@ class EnumTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase test "_before_type_cast returns the enum label (required for form fields)" do assert_equal "proposed", @book.status_before_type_cast end + + test "reserved enum names" do + klass = Class.new(ActiveRecord::Base) do + self.table_name = "books" + enum status: [:proposed, :written, :published] + end + + conflicts = [ + :column, # generates class method .columns, which conflicts with an AR method + :logger, # generates #logger, which conflicts with an AR method + :attributes, # generates #attributes=, which conflicts with an AR method + ] + + conflicts.each_with_index do |name, i| + assert_raises(ArgumentError, "enum name `#{name}` should not be allowed") do + klass.class_eval { enum name => ["value_#{i}"] } + end + end + end + + test "reserved enum values" do + klass = Class.new(ActiveRecord::Base) do + self.table_name = "books" + enum status: [:proposed, :written, :published] + end + + conflicts = [ + :new, # generates a scope that conflicts with an AR class method + :valid, # generates #valid?, which conflicts with an AR method + :save, # generates #save!, which conflicts with an AR method + :proposed, # same value as an existing enum + ] + + conflicts.each_with_index do |value, i| + assert_raises(ArgumentError, "enum value `#{value}` should not be allowed") do + klass.class_eval { enum "status_#{i}" => [value] } + end + end + end + + test "overriding enum method should not raise" do + assert_nothing_raised do + klass = Class.new(ActiveRecord::Base) do + self.table_name = "books" + + def published! + super + "do publish work..." + end + + enum status: [:proposed, :written, :published] + + def written! + super + "do written work..." + end + end + end + end end diff --git a/activerecord/test/cases/finder_respond_to_test.rb b/activerecord/test/cases/finder_respond_to_test.rb index 3ff22f222f..6ab2657c44 100644 --- a/activerecord/test/cases/finder_respond_to_test.rb +++ b/activerecord/test/cases/finder_respond_to_test.rb @@ -5,6 +5,11 @@ class FinderRespondToTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase fixtures :topics + def test_should_preserve_normal_respond_to_behaviour_on_base + assert_respond_to ActiveRecord::Base, :new + assert !ActiveRecord::Base.respond_to?(:find_by_something) + end + def test_should_preserve_normal_respond_to_behaviour_and_respond_to_newly_added_method class << Topic; self; end.send(:define_method, :method_added_for_finder_respond_to_test) { } assert_respond_to Topic, :method_added_for_finder_respond_to_test diff --git a/activerecord/test/cases/scoping/named_scoping_test.rb b/activerecord/test/cases/scoping/named_scoping_test.rb index 086977d9a2..9dc26cfd4d 100644 --- a/activerecord/test/cases/scoping/named_scoping_test.rb +++ b/activerecord/test/cases/scoping/named_scoping_test.rb @@ -266,6 +266,63 @@ class NamedScopingTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase assert_equal 'lifo', topic.author_name end + def test_reserved_scope_names + klass = Class.new(ActiveRecord::Base) do + self.table_name = "topics" + + scope :approved, -> { where(approved: true) } + + class << self + public + def pub; end + + private + def pri; end + + protected + def pro; end + end + end + + subklass = Class.new(klass) + + conflicts = [ + :create, # public class method on AR::Base + :relation, # private class method on AR::Base + :new, # redefined class method on AR::Base + :all, # a default scope + ] + + non_conflicts = [ + :find_by_title, # dynamic finder method + :approved, # existing scope + :pub, # existing public class method + :pri, # existing private class method + :pro, # existing protected class method + :open, # a ::Kernel method + ] + + conflicts.each do |name| + assert_raises(ArgumentError, "scope `#{name}` should not be allowed") do + klass.class_eval { scope name, ->{ where(approved: true) } } + end + + assert_raises(ArgumentError, "scope `#{name}` should not be allowed") do + subklass.class_eval { scope name, ->{ where(approved: true) } } + end + end + + non_conflicts.each do |name| + assert_nothing_raised do + klass.class_eval { scope name, ->{ where(approved: true) } } + end + + assert_nothing_raised do + subklass.class_eval { scope name, ->{ where(approved: true) } } + end + end + end + # Method delegation for scope names which look like /\A[a-zA-Z_]\w*[!?]?\z/ # has been done by evaluating a string with a plain def statement. For scope # names which contain spaces this approach doesn't work. |