diff options
author | Jeffrey Hardy <packagethief@gmail.com> | 2009-03-23 23:15:47 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jeffrey Hardy <packagethief@gmail.com> | 2009-03-23 23:15:47 -0400 |
commit | 76556b08bb8d22dccd7c44e302f625442c5cc8f0 (patch) | |
tree | 560889c89fcaac57778b6cfe2ba135fd70a69f5c /railties/guides/source/nested_model_forms.textile | |
parent | 4b6458bf4cbf14007878b84a3fbc193f3365eebe (diff) | |
parent | f7bdfe8bb76f7830cc2946cf0fcda2bb6d5e3e78 (diff) | |
download | rails-76556b08bb8d22dccd7c44e302f625442c5cc8f0.tar.gz rails-76556b08bb8d22dccd7c44e302f625442c5cc8f0.tar.bz2 rails-76556b08bb8d22dccd7c44e302f625442c5cc8f0.zip |
Merge branch 'master' of git://github.com/lifo/docrails
* 'master' of git://github.com/lifo/docrails: (259 commits)
Fix a small typo
ensure authors get warnings about broken links, and ensure end users don't
in guides generator, warn about duplicate header IDs only if WARN_DUPLICATE_HEADERS
replace edit distance implementation with one written from scratch to avoid license issues
removes a wrong comment in the finders guide
updates fxn picture
thanks but release notes are mostly frozen once they are published, and provide only an overview of the new stuff
Added extra notes to nested model forms explanation in 2.3 release notes to cover has_one relationships
clarifies a bit more what's the issue with check boxes and arrays of parameters
be even more ambiguous about the order of generation of hidden input for check boxes in form helper guide
this page referred to an :href_options keyword hash, in fact the correct keyword (the one the code responds to) is :html
update explanation of check box generation according to f400209
Hidden field with check box goes first.
update rack fixture to be ruby 1.9 compat
Better error message to try to figure out why the CI build is failing
ruby 1.9 compat: Pathname doesn't support =~
update rack fixture to be ruby 1.9 compat
update metal fixtures to be ruby 1.9 compat
Fix brittle Time.now mock
Ensure our bundled version of rack is at the front of the load path
...
Diffstat (limited to 'railties/guides/source/nested_model_forms.textile')
-rw-r--r-- | railties/guides/source/nested_model_forms.textile | 222 |
1 files changed, 222 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/railties/guides/source/nested_model_forms.textile b/railties/guides/source/nested_model_forms.textile new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..4b685b214e --- /dev/null +++ b/railties/guides/source/nested_model_forms.textile @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +h2. Rails nested model forms + +Creating a form for a model _and_ its associations can become quite tedious. Therefor Rails provides helpers to assist in dealing with the complexities of generating these forms _and_ the required CRUD operations to create, update, and destroy associations. + +In this guide you will: + +* do stuff + +endprologue. + +NOTE: This guide assumes the user knows how to use the "Rails form helpers":form_helpers.html in general. Also, it’s *not* an API reference. For a complete reference please visit "the Rails API documentation":http://api.rubyonrails.org/. + + +h3. Model setup + +To be able to use the nested model functionality in your forms, the model will need to support some basic operations. + +First of all, it needs to define a writer method for the attribute that corresponds to the association you are building a nested model form for. The +fields_for+ form helper will look for this method to decide whether or not a nested model form should be build. + +If the associated object is an array a form builder will be yielded for each object, else only a single form builder will be yielded. + +Consider a Person model with an associated Address. When asked to yield a nested FormBuilder for the +:address+ attribute, the +fields_for+ form helper will look for a method on the Person instance named +address_attributes=+. + +h4. ActiveRecord::Base model + +For an ActiveRecord::Base model and association this writer method is commonly defined with the +accepts_nested_attributes_for+ class method: + +h5. has_one + +<ruby> +class Person < ActiveRecord::Base + has_one :address + accepts_nested_attributes_for :address +end +</ruby> + +h5. belongs_to + +<ruby> +class Person < ActiveRecord::Base + belongs_to :firm + accepts_nested_attributes_for :firm +end +</ruby> + +h5. has_many / has_and_belongs_to_many + +<ruby> +class Person < ActiveRecord::Base + has_many :projects + accepts_nested_attributes_for :projects +end +</ruby> + +h4. Custom model + +As you might have inflected from this explanation, you _don’t_ necessarily need an ActiveRecord::Base model to use this functionality. The following examples are sufficient to enable the nested model form behaviour: + +h5. Single associated object + +<ruby> +class Person + def address + Address.new + end + + def address_attributes=(attributes) + # ... + end +end +</ruby> + +h5. Association collection + +<ruby> +class Person + def projects + [Project.new, Project.new] + end + + def projects_attributes=(attributes) + # ... + end +end +</ruby> + +NOTE: See (TODO) in the advanced section for more information on how to deal with the CRUD operations in your custom model. + +h3. Views + +h4. Controller code + +A nested model form will _only_ be build if the associated object(s) exist. This means that for a new model instance you would probably want to build the associated object(s) first. + +Consider the following typical RESTful controller which will prepare a new Person instance and its +address+ and +projects+ associations before rendering the +new+ template: + +<ruby> +class PeopleController < ActionController:Base + def new + @person = Person.new + @person.built_address + 2.times { @person.projects.build } + end + + def create + @person = Person.new(params[:person]) + if @person.save + # ... + end + end +end +</ruby> + +NOTE: Obviously the instantiation of the associated object(s) can become tedious and not DRY, so you might want to move that into the model itself. ActiveRecord::Base provides an +after_initialize+ callback which is a good way to refactor this. + +h4. Form code + +Now that you have a model instance, with the appropriate methods and associated object(s), you can start building the nested model form. + +h5. Standard form + +Start out with a regular RESTful form: + +<erb> +<% form_for @person do |f| %> + <%= f.text_field :name %> +<% end %> +</erb> + +This will generate the following html: + +<html> +<form action="/people" class="new_person" id="new_person" method="post"> + <input id="person_name" name="person[name]" size="30" type="text" /> +</form> +</html> + +h5. Nested form for a single associated object + +Now add a nested form for the +address+ association: + +<erb> +<% form_for @person do |f| %> + <%= f.text_field :name %> + + <% f.fields_for :address do |af| %> + <%= f.text_field :street %> + <% end %> +<% end %> +</erb> + +This generates: + +<html> +<form action="/people" class="new_person" id="new_person" method="post"> + <input id="person_name" name="person[name]" size="30" type="text" /> + + <input id="person_address_attributes_street" name="person[address_attributes][street]" size="30" type="text" /> +</form> +</html> + +Notice that +fields_for+ recognized the +address+ as an association for which a nested model form should be build by the way it has namespaced the +name+ attribute. + +When this form is posted the Rails parameter parser will construct a hash like the following: + +<ruby> +{ + "person" => { + "name" => "Eloy Duran", + "address_attributes" => { + "street" => "Nieuwe Prinsengracht" + } + } +} +</ruby> + +That’s it. The controller will simply pass this hash on to the model from the +create+ action. The model will then handle building the +address+ association for you and automatically save it when the parent (+person+) is saved. + +h5. Nested form for a collection of associated objects + +The form code for an association collection is pretty similar to that of a single associated object: + +<erb> +<% form_for @person do |f| %> + <%= f.text_field :name %> + + <% f.fields_for :projects do |pf| %> + <%= f.text_field :name %> + <% end %> +<% end %> +</erb> + +Which generates: + +<html> +<form action="/people" class="new_person" id="new_person" method="post"> + <input id="person_name" name="person[name]" size="30" type="text" /> + + <input id="person_projects_attributes_0_name" name="person[projects_attributes][0][name]" size="30" type="text" /> + <input id="person_projects_attributes_1_name" name="person[projects_attributes][1][name]" size="30" type="text" /> +</form> +</html> + +As you can see it has generated 2 +project name+ inputs, one for each new +project+ that’s build in the controllers +new+ action. Only this time the +name+ attribute of the input contains a digit as an extra namespace. This will be parsed by the Rails parameter parser as: + +<ruby> +{ + "person" => { + "name" => "Eloy Duran", + "projects_attributes" => { + "0" => { "name" => "Project 1" }, + "1" => { "name" => "Project 2" } + } + } +} +</ruby> + +You can basically see the +projects_attributes+ hash as an array of attribute hashes. One for each model instance. + +NOTE: The reason that +fields_for+ constructed a form which would result in a hash instead of an array is that it won't work for any forms nested deeper than one level deep. + +TIP: You _can_ however pass an array to the writer method generated by +accepts_nested_attributes_for+ if you're using plain Ruby or some other API access. See (TODO) for more info and example.
\ No newline at end of file |