Adding a note about :inverse_of for validations.

From https://github.com/lifo/docrails/commit/cfd324b4b68469ba3188e4b7ba8586e59b239693\#commitcomment-2213592

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/guides/source/active_record_validations_callbacks.md b/guides/source/active_record_validations_callbacks.md
index 3c6e459453..6f1c0b6c24 100644
--- a/guides/source/active_record_validations_callbacks.md
+++ b/guides/source/active_record_validations_callbacks.md
@@ -381,6 +381,14 @@ class LineItem < ActiveRecord::Base
 end
 ```
 
+You should also be sure to have a proper `:inverse_of` as well:
+
+```ruby
+class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
+  has_many :line_items, inverse_of: :order
+end
+```
+
 If you validate the presence of an object associated via a `has_one` or `has_many` relationship, it will check that the object is neither `blank?` nor `marked_for_destruction?`.
 
 Since `false.blank?` is true, if you want to validate the presence of a boolean field you should use `validates :field_name, inclusion: { in: [true, false] }`.