Recommend use of rails over bin/rails

As discussed in #33203 rails command already looks for, and runs,
bin/rails if it is present.

We were mixing recommendations within guides and USAGE guidelines,
in some files we recommended using rails, in others bin/rails and
in some cases we even had both options mixed together.

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/guides/source/routing.md b/guides/source/routing.md
index 41f80a3814..6d7a1ad12c 100644
--- a/guides/source/routing.md
+++ b/guides/source/routing.md
@@ -1191,18 +1191,18 @@ edit_user GET    /users/:id/edit(.:format) users#edit
 You can search through your routes with the grep option: -g. This outputs any routes that partially match the URL helper method name, the HTTP verb, or the URL path.
 
 ```
-$ bin/rails routes -g new_comment
-$ bin/rails routes -g POST
-$ bin/rails routes -g admin
+$ rails routes -g new_comment
+$ rails routes -g POST
+$ rails routes -g admin
 ```
 
 If you only want to see the routes that map to a specific controller, there's the -c option.
 
 ```
-$ bin/rails routes -c users
-$ bin/rails routes -c admin/users
-$ bin/rails routes -c Comments
-$ bin/rails routes -c Articles::CommentsController
+$ rails routes -c users
+$ rails routes -c admin/users
+$ rails routes -c Comments
+$ rails routes -c Articles::CommentsController
 ```
 
 TIP: You'll find that the output from `rails routes` is much more readable if you widen your terminal window until the output lines don't wrap. You can also use --expanded option to turn on the expanded table formatting mode.