diff options
author | Yehuda Katz <wycats@Yehuda-Katz.local> | 2010-01-31 19:17:42 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Yehuda Katz <wycats@Yehuda-Katz.local> | 2010-01-31 19:39:13 -0800 |
commit | 4cbb9db0a5ff65b0a626a5b043331abefd89e717 (patch) | |
tree | a112ce55f5521ff31abf0e4357afcc170fc0a143 /activesupport/lib/active_support/testing/performance.rb | |
parent | 1c83fd2eff3fd174e1aba0512aa2dd8ecdadb2c7 (diff) | |
download | rails-4cbb9db0a5ff65b0a626a5b043331abefd89e717.tar.gz rails-4cbb9db0a5ff65b0a626a5b043331abefd89e717.tar.bz2 rails-4cbb9db0a5ff65b0a626a5b043331abefd89e717.zip |
For performance reasons, you can no longer call html_safe! on Strings. Instead, all Strings are always not html_safe?. Instead, you can get a SafeBuffer from a String by calling #html_safe, which will SafeBuffer.new(self).
* Additionally, instead of doing concat("</form>".html_safe), you can do
safe_concat("</form>"), which will skip both the flag set, and the flag
check.
* For the first pass, I converted virtually all #html_safe!s to #html_safe,
and the tests pass. A further optimization would be to try to use
#safe_concat as much as possible, reducing the performance impact if
we know up front that a String is safe.
Diffstat (limited to 'activesupport/lib/active_support/testing/performance.rb')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions