order should always be concatenated.

order that is declared first has highest priority in all cases.

Here are some examples.

Car.order('name desc').find(:first, :order => 'id').name

Car.named_scope_with_order.named_scope_with_another_order

Car.order('id DESC').scoping do
  Car.find(:first, :order => 'id asc')
end

No special treatment to with_scope or scoping.

Also note that if default_scope declares an order then the order
declared in default_scope has the highest priority unless
with_exclusive_scope is used.

Signed-off-by: Santiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/activerecord/test/cases/base_test.rb b/activerecord/test/cases/base_test.rb
index d58e302cb2..07b06e15a3 100644
--- a/activerecord/test/cases/base_test.rb
+++ b/activerecord/test/cases/base_test.rb
@@ -1139,18 +1139,18 @@ class BasicsTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase
     scoped_developers = Developer.send(:with_scope, :find => { :limit => 1 }) do
       Developer.find(:all, :order => 'salary DESC')
     end
-    # Test scope order + find order, find has priority
+    # Test scope order + find order, order has priority
     scoped_developers = Developer.send(:with_scope, :find => { :limit => 3, :order => 'id DESC' }) do
       Developer.find(:all, :order => 'salary ASC')
     end
     assert scoped_developers.include?(developers(:poor_jamis))
-    assert scoped_developers.include?(developers(:david))
+    assert ! scoped_developers.include?(developers(:david))
     assert ! scoped_developers.include?(developers(:jamis))
     assert_equal 3, scoped_developers.size
 
     # Test without scoped find conditions to ensure we get the right thing
-    developers = Developer.find(:all, :order => 'id', :limit => 1)
-    assert scoped_developers.include?(developers(:david))
+    assert ! scoped_developers.include?(Developer.find(1))
+    assert scoped_developers.include?(Developer.find(11))
   end
 
   def test_scoped_find_limit_offset_including_has_many_association