diff options
| author | claudiob <claudiob@gmail.com> | 2015-05-12 14:51:19 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | claudiob <claudiob@gmail.com> | 2015-05-12 14:51:19 -0700 |
| commit | 0080a886b2297592a95c1286eadff54a1e33fb86 (patch) | |
| tree | a527756011d5eeec597c9e078646f50bc91f8ea5 /activerecord/README.rdoc | |
| parent | e99d909928e4b919ace290c3ace3fbaceeba70da (diff) | |
| download | rails-0080a886b2297592a95c1286eadff54a1e33fb86.tar.gz rails-0080a886b2297592a95c1286eadff54a1e33fb86.tar.bz2 rails-0080a886b2297592a95c1286eadff54a1e33fb86.zip | |
[ci skip] Don’t encourage `sudo gem install`
I think we are better off leaving `sudo` outside of the documented
way of installing gems (`activerecord`, `actionpack`, …).
We don’t want newbies to think that `sudo` is required or, even worse, than
they actually have to type `[sudo] gem install`.
In most scenarios, `sudo` is not needed to install gems, and people who do
need it, probably already know about it.
What do you think? :grin:
Diffstat (limited to 'activerecord/README.rdoc')
| -rw-r--r-- | activerecord/README.rdoc | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/activerecord/README.rdoc b/activerecord/README.rdoc index f4777919d3..85d807933a 100644 --- a/activerecord/README.rdoc +++ b/activerecord/README.rdoc @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ Admit the Database: The latest version of Active Record can be installed with RubyGems: - % [sudo] gem install activerecord + % gem install activerecord Source code can be downloaded as part of the Rails project on GitHub: |