Revert changes to validations from PR #18612

In order to fix issue #17621 we added a check to validations that
determined if a record should be validated. Based on the existing tests
and behavior we wanted we determined the best way to do that was by
checking if `!record.peristed? || record.changed? || record.marked_for_destruction?`

This change didn't make it into a release until now. When #23790 was
opened we realized that `valid?` and `invalid?` were broken and did not
work on persisted records because of the `!record.persisted?`.

While there is still a bug that #17621 brought up, this change was too
drastic and should not be a RC blocker. I will work on fixing this so
that we don't break `valid?` but also aren't validating parent records
through child records if that parent record is validate false. This
change removes the code changes to validate and the corresponding tests.
It adds tests for two of the bugs found since Rails 5 beta2 release.

Fixes #17621

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validator.rb b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validator.rb
index 21339b628e..109bf038b0 100644
--- a/activemodel/lib/active_model/validator.rb
+++ b/activemodel/lib/active_model/validator.rb
@@ -163,17 +163,6 @@ module ActiveModel
     # +ArgumentError+ when invalid options are supplied.
     def check_validity!
     end
-
-    def should_validate?(record) # :nodoc:
-      !record.persisted? || record.changed? || record.marked_for_destruction?
-    end
-
-    # Always validate the record if the attribute is a virtual attribute.
-    # We have no way of knowing that the record was changed if the attribute
-    # does not exist in the database.
-    def unknown_attribute?(record, attribute) # :nodoc:
-      !record.attributes.include?(attribute.to_s)
-    end
   end
 
   # +BlockValidator+ is a special +EachValidator+ which receives a block on initialization