diff options
| author | Andrew White <andrew.white@unboxed.co> | 2017-11-07 11:33:08 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew White <andrew.white@unboxed.co> | 2017-11-08 10:33:34 +0000 |
| commit | 2b434d6f79813dcad162b158fd2b60e34a725ba1 (patch) | |
| tree | 4f0251e4b5d0f8d973e07085df71f1d126ac621b /actionview/test/template/form_options_helper_test.rb | |
| parent | 52d60ec46c9eba98423acfce2680e76bdc1cab36 (diff) | |
| download | rails-2b434d6f79813dcad162b158fd2b60e34a725ba1.tar.gz rails-2b434d6f79813dcad162b158fd2b60e34a725ba1.tar.bz2 rails-2b434d6f79813dcad162b158fd2b60e34a725ba1.zip | |
Allow `Range#include?` on TWZ ranges
In #11474 we prevented TWZ ranges being iterated over which matched
Ruby's handling of Time ranges and as a consequence `include?` stopped
working with both Time ranges and TWZ ranges. However in
ruby/ruby@b061634 support was added for `include?` to use `cover?` for
'linear' objects. Since we have no way of making Ruby consider TWZ
instances as 'linear' we have to override `Range#include?`.
Fixes #30799.
Diffstat (limited to 'actionview/test/template/form_options_helper_test.rb')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions