diff options
author | bogdanvlviv <bogdanvlviv@gmail.com> | 2018-10-25 19:06:21 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | bogdanvlviv <bogdanvlviv@gmail.com> | 2018-10-25 21:29:39 +0300 |
commit | 9d0cf52096dd6f7cb4b153984630eed97dcd8a8c (patch) | |
tree | 009d3e5539acdbf0da3bc08797cbc8442b0e051e /actionview/lib/action_view/template.rb | |
parent | a3dcba42e2422eb9c2e77011a39ce72dc934b420 (diff) | |
download | rails-9d0cf52096dd6f7cb4b153984630eed97dcd8a8c.tar.gz rails-9d0cf52096dd6f7cb4b153984630eed97dcd8a8c.tar.bz2 rails-9d0cf52096dd6f7cb4b153984630eed97dcd8a8c.zip |
`assert_called_with` should require `args` argument
There are two main reasons why `assert_called_with` should require
`args` argument:
1) If we want to assert that some method should be called and we don't
need to check with which arguments it should be called then we should use
`assert_called`.
2) `assert_called_with` without `args` argument doesn't assert anything!
```ruby
assert_called_with(@object, :increment) do
@object.decrement
end
```
It causes false assertions in tests that could cause regressions in the project.
I found this bug by working on
[minitest-mock_expectations](https://github.com/bogdanvlviv/minitest-mock_expectations) gem.
This gem is an extension for minitest that provides almost the same method call
assertions.
I was wondering whether you would consider adding "minitest-mock_expectations"
to `rails/rails` instead of private `ActiveSupport::Testing::MethodCallAssertions` module.
If yes, I'll send a patch - https://github.com/bogdanvlviv/rails/commit/a970ecc42c3a9637947599f2c13e3762e4b59208
Diffstat (limited to 'actionview/lib/action_view/template.rb')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions