blob: bc253ea0fdd39c05f657ad8da2a43636bff64cb0 (
plain) (
tree)
|
|
require 'abstract_unit'
require 'sprockets'
require 'sprockets/helpers/rails_helper'
require 'mocha/setup'
class SprocketsHelperWithRoutesTest < ActionView::TestCase
include Sprockets::Helpers::RailsHelper
# Let's bring in some named routes to test namespace conflicts with potential *_paths.
# We have to do this after we bring in the Sprockets RailsHelper so if there are conflicts,
# they'll fail in the way we expect in a real live Rails app.
routes = ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet.new
routes.draw do
resources :assets
end
include routes.url_helpers
def setup
super
@controller = BasicController.new
@assets = Sprockets::Environment.new
@assets.append_path(FIXTURES.join("sprockets/app/javascripts"))
@assets.append_path(FIXTURES.join("sprockets/app/stylesheets"))
@assets.append_path(FIXTURES.join("sprockets/app/images"))
application = Struct.new(:config, :assets).new(config, @assets)
Rails.stubs(:application).returns(application)
@config = config
@config.perform_caching = true
@config.assets.digest = true
@config.assets.compile = true
end
test "namespace conflicts on a named route called asset_path" do
# Testing this for sanity - asset_path is now a named route!
assert_match asset_path('test_asset'), '/assets/test_asset'
assert_match %r{/assets/logo-[0-9a-f]+.png},
path_to_asset("logo.png")
assert_match %r{/assets/logo-[0-9a-f]+.png},
path_to_asset("logo.png", :digest => true)
assert_match %r{/assets/logo.png},
path_to_asset("logo.png", :digest => false)
end
test "javascript_include_tag with a named_route named asset_path" do
assert_match %r{<script src="/assets/application-[0-9a-f]+.js" type="text/javascript"></script>},
javascript_include_tag(:application)
end
test "stylesheet_link_tag with a named_route named asset_path" do
assert_match %r{<link href="/assets/application-[0-9a-f]+.css" media="screen" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />},
stylesheet_link_tag(:application)
end
end
|