| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| | |
Ensure Action Cable files are removed when `skip_action_cable` is set.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The Action Cable generators creates four files which need to be removed
if `skip_action_cable` is set.
1. `app/assets/javascripts/cable.coffee`
2. `app/channels/application_cable/channel.rb`
3. `app/channels/application_cable/connection.rb`
4. `config/redis/cable.yml`
Fixes #22669.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Ensure that assets are enabled back after the test that tests assets are disabled
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
disabled
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | | |
teknofire/fix-using-add_resource-with-a-block-after-gem-call
Fix using add_resource with a block after gem in custom generators
|
| |/
| |
| |
| | |
generator template.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Action Cable channel generator doesn't create JS assets if options[:rails][:assets] is false
|
| |/ |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The errors message only was not displayed, as if it did not use the inline reporting,
modified to also information the method name and the like in error are displayed.
```
# before
Failed assertion, no message given.
bin/rails test test/models/user_test.rb:5
```
```
# after
Failure:
UserTest#test_the_truth:
Failed assertion, no message given.
bin/rails test test/models/user_test.rb:5
```
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our logic is complex now and we don't need to check the version to asset
the behavior so I'm removing the checking here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We originally chose to apply very strict versioning on the `rails` entry
in the Gemfile, because our future versioning policy was not strongly
defined.
Now it is, and our policy is very much designed on the expectation that
people will regularly update to the latest patch level in their release
series... so we should encourage that.
Of course, Gemfile.lock will do its job and prevent unplanned updates,
just as it does for every other gem in the bundle... but if you run
`bundle update`, we want to get you the latest bug/security fixes
without requiring a manual edit of the Gemfile entry.
Our current version could be a few different shapes, so it takes a bit
of work to find the right specifier, but in principle, we match anything
of the form x.y.*, where x.y matches our current release series.
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Remove legacy mysql adapter
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Application* parent
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
| |
I think Markdown is nowadays a better default.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\ |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| | |
| | | |
Introduce ApplicationRecord, an Active Record layer supertype
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
It's pretty common for folks to monkey patch `ActiveRecord::Base` to
work around an issue or introduce extra functionality. Instead of
shoving even more stuff in `ActiveRecord::Base`, `ApplicationRecord` can
hold all those custom work the apps may need.
Now, we don't wanna encourage all of the application models to inherit
from `ActiveRecord::Base`, but we can encourage all the models that do,
to inherit from `ApplicationRecord`.
Newly generated applications have `app/models/application_record.rb`
present by default. The model generators are smart enough to recognize
that newly generated models have to inherit from `ApplicationRecord`,
but only if it's present.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Running railties generated app tests in development env can cause unintended
consequences. The environments are different and tests aren't meant to be
run in development mode.
The changes to the generator exposed this issue where the random test
order in the generated apps could cause problems when those tests are
run in development mode.
Particularly we saw failures in `railties/test/application/rake_test.rb`
generated apps that used the scaffold to create applications and then
run the migration and immediately run the tests. The error we saw was
`ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound: Couldn't find User with 'id'=980190962`
and seemed to only occur if the destroy test ran first. I'm not entirely
sure _why_ this causes that error to be thrown but I believe it is
related to the environments being different.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
In Rails 5.1 `ActionController::TestCase` will be moved out of Rails
into it's own gem. Please use `ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest` going
forward.
This changes the generators to use `ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest` and
the required URL setup (rather than symbols) for each of the controller
actions.
Updated fix to #22076.
|
| |/
| |
| |
| | |
We will wait until 5.1 to make a decision
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
That would make possible to use it with action cable configuration.
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Apart from specific versioning support, our tests should focus on the
behaviour of whatever version they're accompanying, regardless of when
they were written.
Application code should *not* do this.
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 9712a7a12b7f9e4dcef751ceda8a73c3f4beb11f, reversing
changes made to 3e65c3d3886336e9145438cdeacaf4ebec6a48b8.
Reverting because this caused test failures and while we have a followup
branch there is still one failure that happens randomly and isn't
straight forward to fix.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Controller generators should be creating IntegrationTest stubs instea…
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
ControllerTest
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Prevent a 500 in the default controller scaffold
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If you update a record with no attributes, you'll hit a 500 from a guard
in `assign_attributes` raising:
```ruby
ArgumentError: When assigning attributes, you must pass a hash as an argument.
app/controllers/users_controller.rb:44:in `block in update'
app/controllers/users_controller.rb:43:in `update'
test/controllers/users_controller_test.rb:37:in `block in <class:UsersControllerTest>'
```
Not a biggie, but may be quite confusing for the folks new to the
framework.
|
|/
|
|
|
| |
Web Console 3.0.0 is compatible with Rails 5, while the 2.x.x releases
aren't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the absolute path is not required to re-run the test,
modified so that unnecessary information is not displayed.
```ruby
# before
bin/rails test /path/to/blorgh/test/integration/navigation_test.rb:5
# after
bin/rails test test/integration/navigation_test.rb:5
```
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
is the default value for only API apps
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
behavior
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We had 2 pull requests erronously trying to remove the first command.
Add some comments for clarity.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
y-yagi/remove_request_forgery_protection_from_rails_api
remove `request_forgery_protection` initializer from rails api
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In rails api, since default is so as not to use the `protect_from_forgery`,
`request_forgery_protection` initializer I think that's unnecessary
|
| | |
|