| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Use Rails to Render Default Index Page
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is an alternative implementation to #7771 thanks to the advice of @spastorino
Rails is a dynamic framework that serves a static index.html by default. One of my first questions ever on IRC was solved by simply deleting my public/index.html file. This file is a source of confusion when starting as it over-rides any set "root" in the routes yet it itself is not listed in the routes. By making the page dynamic by default we can eliminate this confusion.
This PR moves the static index page to an internal controller/route/view similar to `rails/info`. When someone starts a rails server, if no root is defined, this route will take over and the "dynamic" index page from rails/welcome_controller will be rendered. These routes are only added in development. If a developer defines a root in their routes, it automatically takes precedence over this route and will be rendered, with no deleting of files required.
In addition to removing this source of confusion for new devs, we can now use Rails view helpers to build and render this page. While not the primary intent, the added value of "dogfooding" should not be under-estimated.
The prior PR #7771 had push-back since it introduced developer facing files. This PR solves all of the same problems, but does not have any new developer facing files (it actually removes one).
cc/ @wsouto, @dickeyxxx, @tyre, @ryanb, @josevalim, @maxim, @subdigital, @steveklabnik
ATP Railties and Actionpack.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
attributes
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
database
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
fixtures
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
generator
|
|/
|
|
| |
This is a test for 978c568a7bffe354180aaefa471092182fed1015
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This cleanup aims to fix a build failure:
https://travis-ci.org/rails/rails/jobs/3515951/#L482
Since travis always have both ENV vars set to "test", a test is failing
where it's expected to output the default env "development", but "test"
is the result due to RACK_ENV being set when we expect it to not be.
By cleaning this duplication we ensure that changing any of these env
variables will pick the right expected value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They was extracted from a plugin.
See https://github.com/rails/rails-observers
[Rafael Mendonça França + Steve Klabnik]
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Encrypted cookies
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes #8121
The `plugin new` generator always adds the dummy app rake tasks,
when a dummy app was created.
|
|/
|
|
| |
harder to read
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as it's removed here
1fc795468525d8622cdca474a54c8310a514aa46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change the default test locations to avoid confusion around the common
testing terms "unit" and "functional".
Add new rake tasks for the new locations, while maintaining backwards
compatibility with the old rake tasks.
New testing locations are as follows:
app/models -> test/models (was test/units)
app/helpers -> test/helpers (was test/units/helpers)
app/controllers -> test/controllers (was test/functional)
app/mailers -> test/mailers (was test/functional)
|
|\
| |
| | |
Use Rack::Cache middleware only if is in Gemfile
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
permissible params
|
|
|
|
| |
mass_assignment_sanitizers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Users of other SCM's can now generate rails
apps that will add the "empty" directories to source control,
but will not have a useless .gitignore or mis-named .gitkeep
files.
* Change `rails new` and `rails plugin new` generators to name
the `.gitkeep` as `.keep` in a more SCM-agnostic way.
* Change `--skip-git` option to only skip the `.gitignore` file
and still generate the `.keep` files.
* Add `--skip-keeps` option to skip the `.keep` files.
It closes #2800.
|
|
|
|
| |
move validation to AR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The cause of the previous revert was bug in bundler that made it hard to
make railties test work. Fix for bundler was recently pushed to github,
so now we can safely get back to the original commit.
This reverts commit 0f5cc34ab58cda99d1401ecc82e1ebb873838dd7.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This functionality will be available from gem
`active_record-session_store` instead.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's not really a good idea to have this as a global config option. We
should allow people to specify the behaviour per association.
There will now be two new values:
* :dependent => :restrict_with_exception implements the current
behaviour of :restrict. :restrict itself is deprecated in favour of
:restrict_with_exception.
* :dependent => :restrict_with_error implements the new behaviour - it
adds an error to the owner if there are dependent records present
See #4727 for the original discussion of this.
|
|
|
|
| |
basic data". I dont consider this something most people is going to want most of the time. If you want to add it in your own app, knock yourself out. But it doesnt belong in Rails imo
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For instance, running
rails g migration CreateMediaJoinTable artists musics:uniq
will create a migration with
create_join_table :artists, :musics do |t|
# t.index [:artist_id, :music_id]
t.index [:music_id, :artist_id], unique: true
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AddXXXToYYY/RemoveXXXFromYYY migrations are produced with references
statements, for instance
rails g migration AddReferencesToProducts user:references
supplier:references{polymorphic}
will generate the migration with:
add_reference :products, :user, index: true
add_reference :products, :supplier, polymorphic: true, index: true
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For instance,
$ rails g model Product supplier:references{polymorphic}
generate model with `belongs_to :supplier, polymorphic: true` association and appropriate migration.
Also fix model_generator_test.rb#L196 and #L201
|
|\
| |
| | |
Plugin gen fix
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
if we are passing -T which is skip_test_unit
See issue #6673 for more details.
I saw that we are not creating dummy app even if
we do skip_test_unit.
Fixes #6673
|