| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
activerecord/lib/active_record/persistence.rb
railties/lib/rails/generators/rails/resource_route/resource_route_generator.rb
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change the default test locations to avoid confusion around the common
testing terms "unit" and "functional".
Add new rake tasks for the new locations, while maintaining backwards
compatibility with the old rake tasks.
New testing locations are as follows:
app/models -> test/models (was test/units)
app/helpers -> test/helpers (was test/units/helpers)
app/controllers -> test/controllers (was test/functional)
app/mailers -> test/mailers (was test/functional)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The main goal is to not generate the format.html block in scaffold
controller, and to generate a different functional test as we don't rely
on redirects anymore, we should test for http responses.
In addition to that, the :edit action is removed from the http
controller and the edit route is not generated by default, as they
usually do not make sense in this scenario.
[Carlos Antonio da Silva & Santiago Pastorino]
|
|
|
|
| |
the 1.9 hash syntax in the generators.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It turned out to be that scaffold for singeleton resource will always depend on another model, and it's not possible at the moment to make the application tests pass after generate the singeleton scafold. So, it would be better to remove it for now and probably provide another generator, such as singeleton_scaffold, in which also require the depended model name.
[#4863 state:resolved]
Signed-off-by: José Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
former since it's less obstrusive.
|
|
|
|
| |
rspec:install generator, you need generators/rspec/install_generator in your load path.
|
|
|