aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/railties/lib/rails/engine/commands.rb
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [Railties] require_relative => requireAkira Matsuda2017-10-211-1/+1
| | | | This basically reverts 618268b4b9382f4bcf004a945fe2d85c0bd03e32
* Adding frozen_string_literal pragma to Railties.Pat Allan2017-08-141-0/+2
|
* [Railties] require => require_relativeAkira Matsuda2017-07-011-1/+1
|
* make all rails commands work in engineyuuji.yaginuma2017-01-091-11/+6
| | | | | | | | Currently, all rails commands can be executed in engine, but `server`, `console`, `dbconsole` and `runner` do not work. This make all rails commands work in engine. Related to #22588
* Run engine commands through command infrastructure.Kasper Timm Hansen2016-09-251-4/+2
|
* applies new string literal convention in railties/libXavier Noria2016-08-061-2/+2
| | | | | The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion, we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
* make rake proxy work in rails enginesyuuji.yaginuma2016-01-311-32/+3
|
* make test runner work correctly inside engineyuuji.yaginuma2015-07-121-2/+4
|
* rails -> Rails [ci skip]Prathamesh Sonpatki2013-05-091-1/+1
|
* removes usage of Object#in? from the code base (the method remains defined ↵Xavier Noria2012-08-061-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | by Active Support) Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base. After some discussion in https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough for this particular idiom. In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked the most in each case.
* Give more detailed instructions in script/rails in enginePiotr Sarnacki2012-05-041-0/+4
| | | | closes #4894
* Add destroy alias to enginesGuillermo Iguaran2011-08-221-2/+3
|
* Use namespace if it's a mountable engineStefan Sprenger2011-06-071-0/+1
|
* Add destroy to engine's commandsStefan Sprenger2011-05-271-2/+3
|
* Move requiring engine out of the switch caseStefan Sprenger2011-05-271-4/+3
|
* Introducing engine commandsStefan Sprenger2011-05-261-0/+37