aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/railties/lib/rails/engine/commands.rb
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* make test runner work correctly inside engineyuuji.yaginuma2015-07-121-2/+4
|
* rails -> Rails [ci skip]Prathamesh Sonpatki2013-05-091-1/+1
|
* removes usage of Object#in? from the code base (the method remains defined ↵Xavier Noria2012-08-061-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | by Active Support) Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base. After some discussion in https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough for this particular idiom. In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked the most in each case.
* Give more detailed instructions in script/rails in enginePiotr Sarnacki2012-05-041-0/+4
| | | | closes #4894
* Add destroy alias to enginesGuillermo Iguaran2011-08-221-2/+3
|
* Use namespace if it's a mountable engineStefan Sprenger2011-06-071-0/+1
|
* Add destroy to engine's commandsStefan Sprenger2011-05-271-2/+3
|
* Move requiring engine out of the switch caseStefan Sprenger2011-05-271-4/+3
|
* Introducing engine commandsStefan Sprenger2011-05-261-0/+37