| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We sometimes say "✂️ newline after `private`" in a code review (e.g.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/18546#discussion_r23188776,
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/34832#discussion_r244847195).
Now `Layout/EmptyLinesAroundAccessModifier` cop have new enforced style
`EnforcedStyle: only_before` (https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/7059).
That cop and enforced style will reduce the our code review cost.
|
| |
|
|
| |
To prevent style check in review like https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/33608#discussion_r211087605.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`DidYouMean::SpellChecker` is not defined.
`did_you_mean` is bundled in Ruby but can be uninstalled, and is not always
available, sometimes even on our CI:
https://travis-ci.org/rails/rails/jobs/372638523#L2405
https://travis-ci.org/rails/rails/jobs/372638523#L2416
https://travis-ci.org/rails/rails/jobs/372638523#L2427
...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we require Ruby over `2.3`, we can replace the current
suggestion methods we have with tooling from the `did_you_mean` gem.
There is a small user visible change and this is that we now offer a
single suggestion for misspelled options. We are suggesting fixes during
generator invocation and during a mistyped rails server rack handler. In
both cases, if we don't make a proper prediction on the first match, we
won't do so in the second or third one, so in my mind, this is okay.
|
| |
|
