| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Reason: ActiveSupport::JSON::Variable is not used anymore internally. It
was deprecated in 3-2-stable but we reverted all the deprecation for
point releases.
See #6536 and #6546.
Conflicts:
activesupport/lib/active_support/json/variable.rb
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Add AS::StringInquirer#respond_to? method
|
| | |/
| |/|
| | |
| | | |
Consistently with #method_missing
|
| | | |
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
by Active Support)
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Conflicts:
activemodel/lib/active_model/secure_password.rb
activerecord/lib/active_record/associations/collection_proxy.rb
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This is a private place to put those AS features that are used
by every component. Nowadays we cherry-pick individual files
wherever they are used, but that it is not worth the effort
for stuff that is going to be loaded for sure sooner or later,
like blank?, autoload, concern, etc.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/XSS_%28Cross_Site_Scripting%29_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet#RULE_.231_-_HTML_Escape_Before_Inserting_Untrusted_Data_into_HTML_Element_Content
Closes #7215
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Make ActiveSupport::Inflector locale aware and multilingual
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The Inflector is currently not very supportive of internationalized
websites. If a user wants to singularize and/or pluralize words based on
any locale other than English, they must define each case in locale
files. Rather than create large locale files with mappings between
singular and plural words, why not allow the Inflector to accept a
locale?
This patch makes ActiveSupport::Inflector locale aware and uses `:en`` unless
otherwise specified. Users will still be provided a list of English (:en)
inflections, but they may additionally define inflection rules for other
locales. Each list is kept separately and permanently. There is no reason to
limit users to one list of inflections:
ActiveSupport::Inflector.inflections(:es) do |inflect|
inflect.plural(/$/, 's')
inflect.plural(/([^aeéiou])$/i, '\1es')
inflect.plural(/([aeiou]s)$/i, '\1')
inflect.plural(/z$/i, 'ces')
inflect.plural(/á([sn])$/i, 'a\1es')
inflect.plural(/é([sn])$/i, 'e\1es')
inflect.plural(/í([sn])$/i, 'i\1es')
inflect.plural(/ó([sn])$/i, 'o\1es')
inflect.plural(/ú([sn])$/i, 'u\1es')
inflect.singular(/s$/, '')
inflect.singular(/es$/, '')
inflect.irregular('el', 'los')
end
'ley'.pluralize(:es) # => "leyes"
'ley'.pluralize(:en) # => "leys"
'avión'.pluralize(:es) # => "aviones"
'avión'.pluralize(:en) # => "avións"
A multilingual Inflector should be of use to anybody that is tasked with
internationalizing their Rails application.
Signed-off-by: David Celis <david@davidcelis.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
class_attribute is a building block and using define_method
can be much slower for such basic method definitions.
This reverts commit d59208d7032e2be855a89ad8d4685cc08dd7cdb3.
|
|/ / / |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Ruby implementations should be free to produce exception
messages that are not identical to MRI. For example,
Rubinius produces 'Expected an even number, got 5'.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
object does not implement the method
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|/ / |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Use lstrip method
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit c08f30ff5fcda7e07cd9275a073acb2091e4b3f7, reversing
changes made to e243a8a32eb4c8777f07ca4b974bd7e38d9477d3.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When the default separator is set logger will create incorrect output
|
| | |
|
|\ \ |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This file uses Time.zone, which is defined in
active_support/core_ext/time/zones.rb.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This way you can `require 'active_record/core_ext/time'` for example
I see these libs are available through `active_record/time` but not
individually
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
minitest/spec provides `describe`, so deprecate the rails version and
have people use the superclass version
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Remove rails implementation of describe, alias "test" to "it"
|
|/ / |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Runner method was removed in ada571bfcdbad669ae43a4dd18277ef227680a0b.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Mocha is already required by AS::TestCase, so remove the duplicate
requires.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|