rails.git - Mirror of official rails repo with custom fixes.

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	[Active Support] `rubocop -a --only Layout/EmptyLineAfterMagicComment`	Koichi ITO	2017-07-11	1	-0/+1
\|
*	Use frozen-string-literal in ActiveSupport	Kir Shatrov	2017-07-09	1	-0/+1
\|
*	Revert "Merge pull request #29540 from kirs/rubocop-frozen-string"	Matthew Draper	2017-07-02	1	-1/+0
\| \| \| \| \|	This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
*	Enforce frozen string in Rubocop	Kir Shatrov	2017-07-01	1	-0/+1
\|
*	Add more rubocop rules about whitespaces	Rafael Mendonça França	2016-10-29	1	-3/+3
\|
*	normalizes indentation and whitespace across the project	Xavier Noria	2016-08-06	1	-2/+2
\|
*	applies new string literal convention in activesupport/test	Xavier Noria	2016-08-06	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \|	The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion, we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
*	Add test cases for #in? and #presence_in	Akshay Vishnoi	2014-06-11	1	-0/+4
\|
*	Go with #presence_in instead of #present_in -- it doesnt sound quite as ↵	David Heinemeier Hansson	2014-02-24	1	-3/+3
\| \| \| \|	good, but the closer relationship to #presence over #present is ultimately worth it
*	Use assert_nil instead as its clearer about what the return is expected to be	David Heinemeier Hansson	2014-02-18	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Added Object#present_in to simplify value whitelisting	David Heinemeier Hansson	2014-02-18	1	-0/+5
\|
*	Revert "Object#in? also accepts multiple parameters"	Brian Morearty	2013-05-01	1	-10/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This reverts commit ebf69ab1636df74c76332c53bcd3d8494fb91b45. `in?` must not take multiple parameters because its behavior would be ambiguous: # Test if "B" is included in a list of names with `"B".in?(names)`: names = ["BMorearty"] "B".in?(names) # => true names = ["BMorearty","rubyduo"] "B".in?(*names) # => false Conflicts: activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/inclusion.rb activesupport/test/core_ext/object/inclusion_test.rb
*	use AS::TestCase as the base class	Aaron Patterson	2012-01-05	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Object#in? also accepts multiple parameters	Tadas Tamošauskas	2011-11-26	1	-0/+10
\|
*	Only rescue a thrown NoMethodError, don't preemptively check for #include?; ↵	Jared McFarland	2011-04-15	1	-0/+4
\| \| \| \|	added tests
*	Remove `#among?` from Active Support	Prem Sichanugrist	2011-04-13	1	-6/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \|	After a long list of discussion about the performance problem from using varargs and the reason that we can't find a great pair for it, it would be best to remove support for it for now. It will come back if we can find a good pair for it. For now, Bon Voyage, `#among?`.
*	Update test name to the corresponding method name	Sebastian Martinez	2011-04-12	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Santiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
*	Change Object#either? to Object#among? -- thanks to @jamesarosen for the ↵	David Heinemeier Hansson	2011-04-12	1	-3/+3
\| \| \| \|	suggestion!
*	Add support for Object#in? and Object#either? in Active Support [#6321 ↵	Prem Sichanugrist, Brian Morearty, John Reitano	2011-04-11	1	-0/+52
	state:committed] This will allow you to check if an object is included in another object or the list of objects or not. This patch is derived from patch by Brian Morearty and John Reitano on Lighthouse ticket. I've rewrite it and make sure that we support both 'another object' and 'list of objects' version, as it surely be useful to support both.