| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
good, but the closer relationship to #presence over #present is ultimately worth it
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit ebf69ab1636df74c76332c53bcd3d8494fb91b45.
`in?` must not take multiple parameters because its behavior would be
ambiguous:
# Test if "B" is included in a list of names with `"B".in?(*names)`:
names = ["BMorearty"]
"B".in?(*names) # => true
names = ["BMorearty","rubyduo"]
"B".in?(*names) # => false
Conflicts:
activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/inclusion.rb
activesupport/test/core_ext/object/inclusion_test.rb
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
added tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After a long list of discussion about the performance problem from using varargs and the reason that we can't find a great pair for it, it would be best to remove support for it for now.
It will come back if we can find a good pair for it. For now, Bon Voyage, `#among?`.
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Santiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
suggestion!
|
|
state:committed]
This will allow you to check if an object is included in another object
or the list of objects or not.
This patch is derived from patch by Brian Morearty and John Reitano on
Lighthouse ticket. I've rewrite it and make sure that we support both
'another object' and 'list of objects' version, as it surely be useful
to support both.
|