aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/activeresource/test/cases
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* Cleanup whitespace introduced in 8377646 and f4f6888Joshua Peek2009-10-022-20/+13
|
* add indifferent access to the attributesTaryn East2009-10-022-0/+28
| | | | Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
* update_attribute(s) added to Active ResourceTaryn East2009-10-021-2/+51
| | | | Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
* Fix brittle content-type check. [#1956 state:committed]Jeremy Kemper2009-09-171-2/+2
|
* Fix failing ARes isolated testsJoshua Peek2009-09-052-1/+4
|
* Added first/last/all aliases for equivalent find scopestaryn2009-08-211-0/+38
| | | | | | | Just a copy from Active Record (with tests). Each is a warpper function for the equivalent scoped call to find eg first is a wrapper for find(:first) Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
* Added save! which raises ResourceInvalid unless valid?taryn2009-08-192-2/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Similar to Active Record - it will raise ActiveResouce::ResourceInvalid if the resource is not valid (ie if <tt>valid?</tt> returns false) However - does not raise ActiveResource::ResourceNotFound if the callbacks fail (callbacks have not yet been implemented) - it will just try to save and raise if the callbacks all fail. This is not ideal behaviour - but will do until we decide to change the behaviour of save_with_validations to actually raise (rather than catch) the ResourceInvalid exception. Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
* Swallow ResourceNotFound error on find_everytaryn2009-08-191-0/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Active Record does not explode with RecordNotFound if you go looking for a collection of objects - it just returns nil. Thus Active Resource should also not explode. After all - finding no objects that match a set of conditions is not exceptional behaviour - unlike looking for a specific object with a given id (which you'd expect to exist). I've also added documentation to +find+ to reflect this. Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
* Pulled find-based tests into their own test case. This matches Active ↵taryn2009-08-192-76/+182
| | | | | | Record, and allows us to have one places where all find-tests are located, which will help when adding dynamic finders later. Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
* Moved all test cases into a new test/cases directory to match Active Record ↵taryn2009-08-199-0/+1774
test directory structure. Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>