| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After a long list of discussion about the performance problem from using varargs and the reason that we can't find a great pair for it, it would be best to remove support for it for now.
It will come back if we can find a good pair for it. For now, Bon Voyage, `#among?`.
|
|
|
|
| |
suggestion!
|
|
|
|
| |
There're a lot of places in Rails source code which make a lot of sense to switching to Object#in? or Object#either? instead of using [].include?.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
response when passing a block to the respond_to method.
Signed-off-by: Santiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
do not replace the response with the same path but different method
- Fix typo
Signed-off-by: José Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
if it has the same request
Signed-off-by: José Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
stored requests and responses by passing false to respond_to
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com>
|
|
header to application/xml [#4939 state:resolved]
Signed-off-by: José Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
|