| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
not "ActiveRecord"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just a copy from Active Record (with tests). Each is a warpper function for
the equivalent scoped call to find eg first is a wrapper for find(:first)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Active Record does not explode with RecordNotFound if you go looking for a
collection of objects - it just returns nil. Thus Active Resource should
also not explode.
After all - finding no objects that match a set of conditions is not
exceptional behaviour - unlike looking for a specific object with a given id
(which you'd expect to exist).
I've also added documentation to +find+ to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
|
|
|
Record, and allows us to have one places where all find-tests are located, which will help when adding dynamic finders later.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
|
