rails.git - Mirror of official rails repo with custom fixes.

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	- elmenth_path raise an ActiveResource::MissingPrefixParam exception when ↵	Gaston Ramos	2010-09-27	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	prefix_options does not has all required prefix_options ex: class StreetAddress < ActiveResource::Base self.site = "http://37s.sunrise.i:3000/people/:person_id/" end StreetAddress.element_path(1) # => ActiveResource::MissingPrefixParam
*	Refactor setup methods by extracting them in abstract_unit, remove TODO.	Emilio Tagua	2010-09-17	1	-95/+1
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: José Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
*	edit pass: the names of Rails components have a space, ie, "Active Record", ↵	Xavier Noria	2010-06-14	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	not "ActiveRecord"
*	Added first/last/all aliases for equivalent find scopes	taryn	2009-08-21	1	-0/+38
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Just a copy from Active Record (with tests). Each is a warpper function for the equivalent scoped call to find eg first is a wrapper for find(:first) Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
*	Swallow ResourceNotFound error on find_every	taryn	2009-08-19	1	-0/+13
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Active Record does not explode with RecordNotFound if you go looking for a collection of objects - it just returns nil. Thus Active Resource should also not explode. After all - finding no objects that match a set of conditions is not exceptional behaviour - unlike looking for a specific object with a given id (which you'd expect to exist). I've also added documentation to +find+ to reflect this. Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
*	Pulled find-based tests into their own test case. This matches Active ↵	taryn	2009-08-19	1	-0/+182
	Record, and allows us to have one places where all find-tests are located, which will help when adding dynamic finders later. Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>