| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the same id's records are saved and/or destroyed in the transaction,
commit callbackes will only run for the first enrolled record.
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/a023e2180093ebc517a642aaf21f3c7241c67657/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/transaction.rb#L115-L119
The regression #36132 is caused due to #35920 changed the enrollment
order that the first action's record will be enrolled to last in the
transaction.
We could not change the the enrollment order as long as someone depends
on the enrollment order.
Fixes #36132.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a regression for #35864.
Usually, stashed joins (mainly eager loading) are performed as LEFT
JOINs.
But the case of merging joins/left_joins of different class, that
(stashed) joins are performed as the same `join_type` as the parent
context for now.
Since #35864, both (joins/left_joins) stashed joins might be contained
in `joins_values`, so each stashed joins should maintain its own
`join_type` context.
Fixes #36103.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Model error as object
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Revert some tests to ensure back compatibility
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
autosave duplicate errors can be removed
See SHA 7550f0a016ee6647aaa76c0c0ae30bebc3867288
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
abhaynikam/35866-add-touch-option-for-has-one-association
Adds missing touch option to has_one association
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
If we want to get alias resolved attribute finally, we can use
`attribute_alias` directly.
For that purpose, avoiding redundant `attribute_alias?` makes alias
attribute access 40% faster.
https://gist.github.com/kamipo/e427f080a27b46f50bc508fae3612a0e
Before (2c0729d8):
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
user['id'] 102.668k i/100ms
user['new_id'] 80.660k i/100ms
user['name'] 99.368k i/100ms
user['new_name'] 81.626k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
user['id'] 1.431M (± 4.0%) i/s - 7.187M in 5.031985s
user['new_id'] 1.042M (± 4.2%) i/s - 5.243M in 5.039858s
user['name'] 1.406M (± 5.6%) i/s - 7.055M in 5.036743s
user['new_name'] 1.074M (± 3.6%) i/s - 5.387M in 5.024152s
```
After (this change):
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
user['id'] 109.775k i/100ms
user['new_id'] 103.303k i/100ms
user['name'] 105.988k i/100ms
user['new_name'] 99.618k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
user['id'] 1.520M (± 6.7%) i/s - 7.574M in 5.011496s
user['new_id'] 1.485M (± 6.2%) i/s - 7.438M in 5.036252s
user['name'] 1.538M (± 5.4%) i/s - 7.737M in 5.049765s
user['new_name'] 1.516M (± 4.6%) i/s - 7.571M in 5.007293s
```
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Follow up of #35838.
And also this refactors `in_clause_length` handling is entirely
integrated in Arel visitor.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
* Avoid duplicated `@new_record` assignment
* Extract `define_attribute_methods` into `init_internals`
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Follow up to b1458218c95d85c4ce911dd3e99da5ae7cf7aeee.
|
|/ / |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Minor API doc fix
[ci skip]
|
| | | |
|
|/ / |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Deprecate `where.not` working as NOR and will be changed to NAND in Rails 6.1
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
`where.not` with polymorphic association is partly fixed incidentally at
213796f (refer #33493, #26207, #17010, #16983, #14161), and I've added
test case e9ba12f to avoid lose that fix accidentally in the future.
In Rails 5.2, `where.not(polymorphic: object)` works as expected as
NAND, but `where.not(polymorphic_type: object.class.polymorphic_name,
polymorphic_id: object.id)` still unexpectedly works as NOR.
To will make `where.not` working desiredly as NAND in Rails 6.1, this
deprecates `where.not` working as NOR. If people want to continue NOR
conditions, we'd encourage to them to `where.not` each conditions
manually.
```ruby
all = [treasures(:diamond), treasures(:sapphire), cars(:honda), treasures(:sapphire)]
assert_equal all, PriceEstimate.all.map(&:estimate_of)
```
In Rails 6.0:
```ruby
sapphire = treasures(:sapphire)
nor = all.reject { |e|
e.estimate_of_type == sapphire.class.polymorphic_name
}.reject { |e|
e.estimate_of_id == sapphire.id
}
assert_equal [cars(:honda)], nor
without_sapphire = PriceEstimate.where.not(
estimate_of_type: sapphire.class.polymorphic_name, estimate_of_id: sapphire.id
)
assert_equal nor, without_sapphire.map(&:estimate_of)
```
In Rails 6.1:
```ruby
sapphire = treasures(:sapphire)
nand = all - [sapphire]
assert_equal [treasures(:diamond), cars(:honda)], nand
without_sapphire = PriceEstimate.where.not(
estimate_of_type: sapphire.class.polymorphic_name, estimate_of_id: sapphire.id
)
assert_equal nand, without_sapphire.map(&:estimate_of)
```
Resolves #31209.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Related 0ee96d13de29680e148ccb8e5b68025f29fd091c.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
PERF: 20% faster pk attribute access
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
I've realized that `user.id` is 20% slower than `user.name` in the
benchmark (https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/35987#issuecomment-483882480).
The reason that performance difference is that `self.class.primary_key`
method call is a bit slow.
Avoiding that method call will make almost attribute access faster and
`user.id` will be completely the same performance with `user.name`.
Before (02b5b8cb):
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
user.id 140.535k i/100ms
user['id'] 96.549k i/100ms
user.name 158.110k i/100ms
user['name'] 94.507k i/100ms
user.changed? 19.003k i/100ms
user.saved_changes? 25.404k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
user.id 2.231M (± 0.9%) i/s - 11.243M in 5.040066s
user['id'] 1.310M (± 1.3%) i/s - 6.565M in 5.012607s
user.name 2.683M (± 1.2%) i/s - 13.439M in 5.009392s
user['name'] 1.322M (± 0.9%) i/s - 6.615M in 5.003239s
user.changed? 201.999k (±10.9%) i/s - 1.007M in 5.091195s
user.saved_changes? 258.214k (±17.1%) i/s - 1.245M in 5.007421s
```
After (this change):
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
user.id 158.364k i/100ms
user['id'] 106.412k i/100ms
user.name 158.644k i/100ms
user['name'] 107.518k i/100ms
user.changed? 19.082k i/100ms
user.saved_changes? 24.886k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
user.id 2.768M (± 1.1%) i/s - 13.936M in 5.034957s
user['id'] 1.507M (± 2.1%) i/s - 7.555M in 5.017211s
user.name 2.727M (± 1.5%) i/s - 13.643M in 5.004766s
user['name'] 1.521M (± 1.3%) i/s - 7.634M in 5.018321s
user.changed? 200.865k (±11.1%) i/s - 992.264k in 5.044868s
user.saved_changes? 269.652k (±10.5%) i/s - 1.344M in 5.077972s
```
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Those helper methods makes relation values access 15% slower.
https://gist.github.com/kamipo/e64439f7a206e1c5b5c69d92d982828e
Before (02b5b8cb):
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
#limit_value 237.074k i/100ms
#limit_value = 1 222.052k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
#limit_value 6.477M (± 2.9%) i/s - 32.479M in 5.019475s
#limit_value = 1 5.297M (± 4.3%) i/s - 26.424M in 4.999933s
```
After (this change):
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
#limit_value 261.109k i/100ms
#limit_value = 1 239.646k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
#limit_value 7.412M (± 1.6%) i/s - 37.077M in 5.003345s
#limit_value = 1 6.134M (± 1.0%) i/s - 30.675M in 5.000908s
```
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
It was never used from the beginning.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Method call in Ruby is a bit slow.
This makes attribute access 10% faster by avoiding method call
(`sync_with_transaction_state`).
Before (96cf7e0e):
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
user.id 131.291k i/100ms
user['id'] 91.786k i/100ms
user.name 151.605k i/100ms
user['name'] 92.664k i/100ms
user.changed? 17.772k i/100ms
user.saved_changes? 23.909k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
user.id 1.988M (± 7.0%) i/s - 9.978M in 5.051474s
user['id'] 1.155M (± 5.8%) i/s - 5.783M in 5.022672s
user.name 2.450M (± 4.3%) i/s - 12.280M in 5.021234s
user['name'] 1.263M (± 2.1%) i/s - 6.394M in 5.066638s
user.changed? 175.070k (±13.3%) i/s - 853.056k in 5.011555s
user.saved_changes? 259.114k (±11.8%) i/s - 1.267M in 5.001260s
```
After (this change):
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
user.id 137.625k i/100ms
user['id'] 96.054k i/100ms
user.name 156.379k i/100ms
user['name'] 94.795k i/100ms
user.changed? 18.172k i/100ms
user.saved_changes? 24.337k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
user.id 2.201M (± 0.5%) i/s - 11.010M in 5.002955s
user['id'] 1.320M (± 1.0%) i/s - 6.628M in 5.021293s
user.name 2.677M (± 1.6%) i/s - 13.449M in 5.024399s
user['name'] 1.314M (± 1.8%) i/s - 6.636M in 5.051444s
user.changed? 190.588k (±11.1%) i/s - 944.944k in 5.065848s
user.saved_changes? 262.782k (±12.1%) i/s - 1.290M in 5.028080s
```
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
abhaynikam/change-deprecation-for-dynamic-route-segment-to-6.1
Change the deprecation message for dynamic routes segment to 6.1
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Rails 6.1
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This was accidentally left in, the standard `db:migrate:up` doesn't have
a description so `db:migrate:up:namespace` shouldn't have one either.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This change adds the ability to run up/down for a database in a multi-db
environment.
If you have an app with a primary and animals database the following
tasks will be generated:
```
VERSION=123 rake db:migrate:up:primary
VERSION=123 rake db:migrate:up:primary
VERSION=123 rake db:migrate:down:primary
VERSION=123 rake db:migrate:up:animals
```
I didn't generate descriptions with them since we don't generate a
description for a single database application.
In addition to this change I've made it so if your application has
multiple databases Rails will raise if you try to run `up` or `down`
without a namespace. This is because we don't know which DB you want to
run `up` or `down` against unless the app tells us, so it's safer to
just block it and recommend using namespaced versions of up/down
respectively.
The output for the raise looks like:
```
You're using a multiple database application. To use `db:migrate:down`
you must run the namespaced task with a VERSION. Available tasks are
db:migrate:down:primary and db:migrate:down:animals.
```
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This reverts commit f656bb301a43fe441af0039e4fafe40a7faa62f8.
Reason: Test in Action View expects the `collection_cache_key` working...
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/ff6b713f5e729859995f204093ad3f8e08f39ea8/actionview/test/activerecord/relation_cache_test.rb#L21
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/ff6b713f5e729859995f204093ad3f8e08f39ea8/actionview/test/fixtures/project.rb#L6
https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/60609#d19181fb-fe80-4d1e-891c-1109b540fb4b/981-1009
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Document algorithm: concurrent option for PostgreSQL [ci skip]
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The `collection_cache_key` is private API for a long time, but I've
maintained it in #35848 since it is mentioned in the doc
(https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/35848#discussion_r272011475).
The doc has removed at 1da9a7e4, so there is no longer a reason to
maintain that private API.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Introduce Actionable Errors
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |/ /
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Actionable errors let's you dispatch actions from Rails' error pages. This
can help you save time if you have a clear action for the resolution of
common development errors.
The de-facto example are pending migrations. Every time pending migrations
are found, a middleware raises an error. With actionable errors, you can
run the migrations right from the error page. Other examples include Rails
plugins that need to run a rake task to setup themselves. They can now
raise actionable errors to run the setup straight from the error pages.
Here is how to define an actionable error:
```ruby
class PendingMigrationError < MigrationError #:nodoc:
include ActiveSupport::ActionableError
action "Run pending migrations" do
ActiveRecord::Tasks::DatabaseTasks.migrate
end
end
```
To make an error actionable, include the `ActiveSupport::ActionableError`
module and invoke the `action` class macro to define the action. An action
needs a name and a procedure to execute. The name is shown as the name of a
button on the error pages. Once clicked, it will invoke the given
procedure.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
https://buildkite.com/rails/rails/builds/60601#81daf2ee-9259-42e5-983d-c57d66499b76/928-939
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This follows #35595.
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This partly reverts 8ca3c286a768038f6b391fd3bfbdfcc299876a1f.
`.is_a?(GeneratedAttributeMethodsBuilder)` doesn't make sense to me, the
module class's `new` creates just an instance of the module class itself.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
When I added the rake tasks for multiple databases I accidentally made
it so you couldn't use Active Record without Railties.
Since getting the database configuration depends on being able to load
Railties (there is no other way to read and parse the yaml file and load
it) I've decided that using multiple databases outside of Rails is a
no-op.
I've changed the code here to return if Rails isn't defined. Then I
changed the other tasks to use `ActiveRecord::Tasks::DatabaseTasks.env`
instead of `Rails.env`. The multi-db tasks can keep using `Rails.env`
because they'll only be generated if we're using Rails and not just
Active Record.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix dirty tracking after rollback.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Currently the rollback only restores primary key value, `new_record?`,
`destroyed?`, and `frozen?`. Since the `save` clears current dirty
attribute states, retrying save after rollback will causes no change
saved if partial writes is enabled (by default).
This makes `remember_transaction_record_state` remembers original values
then restores dirty attribute states after rollback.
Fixes #15018.
Fixes #30167.
Fixes #33868.
Fixes #33443.
Closes #33444.
Closes #34504.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Cache versioning enables the same cache key to be reused when the object
being cached changes by moving the volatile part of the cache key out of
the cache key and into a version that is embedded in the cache entry.
This is already occurring when the object being cached is an
`ActiveRecord::Base`, but when caching an `ActiveRecord::Relation`
we are currently still putting the volatile information (max updated at
and count) as part of the cache key.
This PR moves the volatile part of the relations `cache_key` into the
`cache_version` to support recycling cache keys for
`ActiveRecord::Relation`s.
|