| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes #12812
Raise `ActiveRecord::RecordNotDestroyed` when a child marked with
`dependent: destroy` can't be destroyed.
The following code:
```ruby
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments, dependent: :destroy
end
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
before_destroy do
return false
end
end
post = Post.create!(comments: [Comment.create!])
post.comments = [Comment.create!]
````
would result in a `post` with two `comments`.
With this commit, the same code would raise a `RecordNotDestroyed`
exception, keeping the `post` with the same `comment`.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm pretty confused about the addition of this method. The documentation
says that it was intended to allow the removal of values from the
default scope (in contrast to #except). However it behaves exactly the
same as except: https://gist.github.com/jonleighton/7537008 (other than
having a slightly enhanced syntax).
The removal of the default scope is allowed by
94924dc32baf78f13e289172534c2e71c9c8cade, which was not a change we
could make until 4.1 due to the need to deprecate things. However after
that change #unscope still gives us nothing that #except doesn't already
give us.
However there *is* a desire to be able to unscope stuff in a way that
persists across merges, which would allow associations to be defined
which unscope stuff from the default scope of the associated model. E.g.
has_many :comments, -> { unscope where: :trashed }
So that's what this change implements. I've also corrected the
documentation. I removed the guide references to #except as I think
unscope really supercedes #except now.
While we're here, there's also a potential desire to be able to write
this:
has_many :comments, -> { unscoped }
However, it doesn't make sense and would not be straightforward to
implement. While with #unscope we're specifying exactly what we want to
be removed from the relation, with "unscoped" we're just saying that we
want it to not have some things which were added earlier on by the
default scope. However in the case of an association, we surely don't
want *all* conditions to be removed, otherwise the above would just
become "SELECT * FROM comments" with no foreign key constraint.
To make the above work, we'd have to somehow tag the relation values
which get added when evaluating the default scope in order to
differentiate them from other relation values. Which is way too much
complexity and therefore not worth it when most use cases can be
satisfied with unscope.
Closes #10643, #11061.
|
|
|
|
| |
attribute or method.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
map to integers in the database, but can be queried by name
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: #12242, #9517, #10240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently `scope_chain` uses same array for building different
`scope_chain` for different associations. During processing
these arrays are sometimes mutated and because of in-place
mutation the changed `scope_chain` impacts other reflections.
Fix is to dup the value before adding to the `scope_chain`.
Fixes #3882.
|
|
|
|
| |
Related issue: #11939, #12084
|
|
|
|
| |
side of a hm:t association along with preloading.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Make sure inverse_of is visible on the has_many callbacks
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Collapse where constraints to the Arel::Nodes::And node
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In order to remove duplication with joining arel where constraints with
`AND`, all constraints on `build_arel` are collapsed into one head node: `Arel::Nodes::And`
Closes: #11963
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
change def self.primary_key to self.primary_key
change def self.primary_key to self.primary_key
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
actionview/README.rdoc
activerecord/lib/active_record/migration.rb
guides/source/development_dependencies_install.md
guides/source/getting_started.md
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 70d6e16fbad75b89dd1798ed697e7732b8606fa3, reversing
changes made to ea4db3bc078fb3093ecdddffdf4f2f4ff3e1e8f9.
Seems to be a code merge done by mistake.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Currently, ActiveRecord models with multiple words cannot have their
inverse associations detected automatically.
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
change def self.primary_key to self.primary_key
change def self.primary_key to self.primary_key
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
association proxy
Closes #11248.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Method `delete_all` should not be invoking callbacks and this
feature was deprecated in Rails 4.0. This is being removed.
`delete_all` will continue to honor the `:dependent` option. However
if `:dependent` value is `:destroy` then the default deletion
strategy for that collection will be applied.
User can also force a deletion strategy by passing parameter to
`delete_all`. For example you can do `@post.comments.delete_all(:nullify)`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For example, you need to change this:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :posts
has_many :taggings, :through => :posts
end
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :tagging
has_many :taggings
end
class Tagging < ActiveRecord::Base
end
To this:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :posts
has_many :taggings, :through => :posts, :source => :tagging
end
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :tagging
has_many :taggings
end
class Tagging < ActiveRecord::Base
end
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of using +inverse_of: false+ option. Changing the documentation and
adding a CHANGELOG entry for the automatic inverse detection feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When removing records from a `has_many` association it used
the `primary_key` defined on the association.
Our test suite didn't fail because on all occurences of `:primary_key`,
the specified column was available in both tables. This prevented the
code from raising an exception but it still behaved badly.
I added a test-case to prevent regressions that failed with:
```
1) Error:
HasManyAssociationsTest#test_has_many_assignment_with_custom_primary_key:
ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: SQLite3::SQLException: no such column: essays.first_name: UPDATE "essays" SET "writer_id" = NULL WHERE "essays"."writer_id" = ? AND "essays"."first_name" IS NULL
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b601399b72ab56cc01368f02615af99f45d1
4f02/activerecord/lib/active_record/counter_cache.rb#L14, u can pass
more then one association to the `reset_counters` method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the results. Added tests to check to make sure that inverse associations are
automatically found when has_many, has_one, or belongs_to associations
are defined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When using symbol keys, ActiveRecord will now translate aliased attribute names to the actual column name used in the database:
With the model
class Topic
alias_attribute :heading, :title
end
The call
Topic.where(heading: 'The First Topic')
should yield the same result as
Topic.where(title: 'The First Topic')
This also applies to ActiveRecord::Relation::Calculations calls such as `Model.sum(:aliased)` and `Model.pluck(:aliased)`.
This will not work with SQL fragment strings like `Model.sum('DISTINCT aliased')`.
Github #7839
*Godfrey Chan*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See #9869 and #9929.
The problem arises from the following example:
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :completed, -> { where completed: true }
end
class MajorProject < Project
end
When calling:
MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).completed
This expands to:
MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).scoping {
MajorProject.completed
}
However the lambda for the `completed` scope is defined on Project. This
means that when it is called, `self` is Project rather than
MajorProject. So it expands to:
MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).scoping {
Project.where(completed: true)
}
Since the scoping was applied on MajorProject, and not Project, this
fails to apply the tasks_count condition.
The solution is to make scoping apply across STI classes. I am slightly
concerned about the possible side-effects of this, but no tests fail and
it seems ok. I guess we'll see.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #10016
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR #5210 added a Friendship model to illustrate a bug, but in doing so
created a confusing structure because both belongs_to declarations in
Friendship referred to the same side of the join. The new structure
maintains the integrity of the bug test while changing the follower
relationship to be more useful for other testing.
|