aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/activerecord/test/models/chef.rb
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Use frozen-string-literal in ActiveRecordKir Shatrov2017-07-191-0/+2
|
* Revert "Merge pull request #29540 from kirs/rubocop-frozen-string"Matthew Draper2017-07-021-1/+0
| | | | | This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
* Enforce frozen string in RubocopKir Shatrov2017-07-011-0/+1
|
* Add missing source_type if provided on hmt which belongs to an sti recordVipul A M2016-01-241-0/+4
| | | | Fixes #23209
* Fix leaky chain on polymorphic associationeileencodes2015-03-151-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If there was a polymorphic hm:t association with a scope AND second non-scoped hm:t association on a model the polymorphic scope would leak through into the call for the non-polymorhic hm:t association. This would only break if `hotel.drink_designers` was called before `hotel.recipes`. If `hotel.recipes` was called first there would be no problem with the SQL. Before (employable_type should not be here): ``` SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "drink_designers" INNER JOIN "chefs" ON "drink_designers"."id" = "chefs"."employable_id" INNER JOIN "departments" ON "chefs"."department_id" = "departments"."id" WHERE "departments"."hotel_id" = ? AND "chefs"."employable_type" = ? [["hotel_id", 1], ["employable_type", "DrinkDesigner"]] ``` After: ``` SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "recipes" INNER JOIN "chefs" ON "recipes"."chef_id" = "chefs"."id" INNER JOIN "departments" ON "chefs"."department_id" = "departments"."id" WHERE "departments"."hotel_id" = ? [["hotel_id", 1]] ``` From the SQL you can see that `employable_type` was leaking through when calling recipes. The solution is to dup the chain of the polymorphic association so it doesn't get cached. Additionally, this follows `scope_chain` which dup's the `source_reflection`'s `scope_chain`. This required another model/table/relationship because the leak only happens on a hm:t polymorphic that's called before another hm:t on the same model. I am specifically testing the SQL here instead of the number of records becasue the test could pass if there was 1 drink designer recipe for the drink designer chef even though the `employable_type` was leaking through. This needs to specifically check that `employable_type` is not in the SQL statement.
* scope_chain should not be mutated for other reflectionsNeeraj Singh2013-10-141-0/+3
Currently `scope_chain` uses same array for building different `scope_chain` for different associations. During processing these arrays are sometimes mutated and because of in-place mutation the changed `scope_chain` impacts other reflections. Fix is to dup the value before adding to the `scope_chain`. Fixes #3882.