| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
conflicting private method defined on its ancestors.
The problem is that `method_defined_within?(name, klass, superklass)`
only works correclty when `klass` and `superklass` are both `Class`es.
If both `klass` and `superklass` are both `Class`es, they share the
same inheritance chain, so if a method is defined on `klass` but not
`superklass`, this method must be introduced at some point between
`klass` and `superklass`.
This does not work when `superklass` is a `Module`. A `Module`'s
inheritance chain contains just itself. So if a method is defined on
`klass` but not on `superklass`, the method could still be defined
somewhere upstream, e.g. in `Object`.
This fix works by avoiding calling `method_defined_within?` with a
module while still fufilling the requirement (checking that the
method is defined withing `superclass` but not is not a generated
attribute method).
4d8ee288 is likely an attempted partial fix for this problem. This
unrolls that fix and properly check the `superclass` as intended.
Fixes #11569.
|
