| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
[Rafael Mendonça França + Jean Boussier]
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As per previous discussions, we want to give users the ability to
reference their own types with symbols, instead of having to pass the
object manually. This adds the class that will be used to do so.
ActiveRecord::Type.register(:money, MyMoneyType)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The same is not true of `define_attribute`, which is meant to be the low
level no-magic API that sits underneath. The differences between the two
APIs are:
- `attribute`
- Lazy (the attribute will be defined after the schema has loaded)
- Allows either a type object or a symbol
- `define_attribute`
- Runs immediately (might get trampled by schema loading)
- Requires a type object
This was the last blocker in terms of public interface requirements
originally discussed for this feature back in May. All the
implementation blockers have been cleared, so this feature is probably
ready for release (pending one more look-over by me).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given that this was originally added to normalize an error that would
have otherwise come from the database (inconsistently), it's more
natural for us to raise in `type_cast_for_database`, rather than
`type_cast_from_user`. This way, things like numericality validators can
handle it instead if the user chooses to do so. It also fixes an issue
where assigning an out of range value would make it impossible to assign
a new value later.
This fixes several vague issues, none of which were ever directly
reported, so I have no issue number to give. Places it was mentioned
which I can remember:
- https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/blob/9ba21381d7caf045053a81f32df7de2f49687820/lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/allow_value_matcher.rb#L261-L263
- https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/18653#issuecomment-71197026
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The string encoding test wasn't using the types for anything. The
boolean casting test included logic that should be in the tests for the
types, and the string test was legitimately not testing anything useful.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This bug occurs when an attribute of an ActiveRecord model is an
ActiveRecord::Type::Integer type or a ActiveRecord::Type::Decimal type (or any
other type that includes the ActiveRecord::Type::Numeric module. When the value
of the attribute is negative and is set to the same negative value, it is marked
as changed.
Take the following example of a Person model with the integer attribute age:
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
# age :integer(4)
end
The following will produce the error:
person = Person.new(age: -1)
person.age = -1
person.changes
=> { "age" => [-1, -1] }
person.age_changed?
=> true
The problematic line is here:
module ActiveRecord
module Type
module Numeric
...
def non_numeric_string?(value)
# 'wibble'.to_i will give zero, we want to make sure
# that we aren't marking int zero to string zero as
# changed.
value.to_s !~ /\A\d+\.?\d*\z/
end
end
end
end
The regex match doesn't accept numbers with a leading '-'.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes #18122
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Correct test description for large integer test
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It doesn't make sense for the subclass to implement this method, and not
have it on the parent. We can also DRY up the implementation of
`#lookup` to be defined in terms of fetch, which will give us a single
point of entry
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Why are people assigning booleans to string columns? >_>
We unintentionally changed the behavior on Sqlite3 and PostgreSQL.
Boolean values should cast to the database's representation of true and
false. This is 't' and 'f' by default, and "1" and "0" on Mysql. The
implementation to make the connection adapter specific behavior is hacky
at best, and should be re-visted once we decide how we actually want to
separate the concerns related to things that should change based on the
database adapter.
That said, this isn't something I'd expect to change based on my
database adapter. We're storing a string, so the way the database
represents a boolean should be irrelevant. It also seems strange for us
to give booleans special behavior at all in string columns. Why is
`to_s` not sufficient? It's inconsistent and confusing. Perhaps we
should consider deprecating in the future.
Fixes #17571
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We had accidentally gone one power of two too far. In addition, we need
to handle minimum values as well as the maximum.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
When I defines large precision column at RDBMS,
I assigns float value, raise ArgumentError (precision too large).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
`ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::Type::Value` =>
`ActiveRecord::Type::Value`
|
