| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Allow `joins` to be unscoped
Fixes #13775
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit f6db31ec16e42ee7713029f7120f0b011d1ddc6c.
Reason:
Scope names can very easily conflict, particularly when sharing Concerns
within the team, or using multiple gems that extend AR models.
It is true that Ruby has the ability to detect this with the -w option, but the
reality is that we are depending on too many gems that do not care about Ruby
warnings, therefore it might not be a realistic solution to turn this switch on
in our real-world apps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given a default_scope on a parent of the current class, where that
parent is not the base class, the parent's STI condition would become
attached to the evaluated default scope, and then override the child's
own STI condition.
Instead, we can treat the STI condition as though it is a default scope,
and skip it in this situation: the scope will be merged into the base
relation, which already contains the correct STI condition.
Fixes #22426.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While the commit message (and changelog example) in
5e0b555b453ea2ca36986c111512627d806101e7 talked about sibling classes,
the added test had a child ignore its parent's scoping, which seems less
reasonable.
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Prevent duplicating `where` clauses
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
class
Fixes #19528
fix for mysql2 test
better test
|
|/
|
|
|
|
| |
Code such as the following will be corrected.
Developer.where(id: -Float::INFINITY...2).unscope(where: :id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The testing of error messages have been implemented wrongly a few times.
This is an attempt to fix it.
For example, some of these test should have failed with the new code.
The reason they are not failling with the new string is the fact they
were not being tested beforehand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It looks like the only reason `current_scope` was thread local on
`base_class` instead of `self` is to ensure that when we call a named
scope created with a proc on the parent class, it correctly uses the
default scope of the subclass. The reason this wasn't happening was
because the proc captured `self` as the parent class, and we're not
actually defining a real method. Using `instance_exec` fixes the
problem.
Fixes #18806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only place it was accessed was in tests. Many of them have another
way that they can test their behavior, that doesn't involve reaching
into internals as far as they did. `AssociationScopeTest` is testing a
situation where the where clause would have one bind param per
predicate, so it can just ignore the predicates entirely. The where
chain test was primarly duplicating the logic tested on `WhereClause`
directly, so I instead just make sure it calls the appropriate method
which is fully tested in isolation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is no longer required now that we are injecting a type caster
object into the Arel table, with the exception of uniqueness
validations. Since it calls `ConnectionAdapter#type_cast`, the value has
already been cast for the database. We don't want Arel to attempt to
cast it further, so we need to continue wrapping it in a quoted node.
This can potentially go away when this validator is refactored to make
better use of `where` or the predicate builder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of the larger refactoring to remove type casting from Arel. We can
inform it that we already have the right type by wrapping the value in
an `Arel::Nodes::Quoted`. This commit can be reverted when we have
removed type casting from Arel in Rail 5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit fixes the following case.
User.where(User.arel_table[:created_at].lteq(1.year.ago)).unscope(where :created_at)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`Computer` class needs to be require
See #17217 for more details
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Raises ArgumentError when try to define a scope without a callable
|
|/
|
|
|
|
| |
This changes the actual exception `NoMethodError: undefined method `call'
for #<ActiveRecord::Relation []>` to a `ArgumentError` when try to define
a scope without a callable.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
follow up for #17052
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For now, we don't want to take "scoping" calls in to account when
calculating cache keys for relations, so just opt-out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eagerly loaded collection and singular associations are ignored by the StatementCache, which causes errors when the queries they generate reference columns that were not eagerly loaded.
This commit skips the creation of the StatementCache as a fix for these scenarios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added a few more methods on Module/Class to the dangerous class methods
blacklist. (Technically, allocate and new are already protected currently because
we happen to redefine them in the current implantation.)
Closes #16792
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 9a1abedcdeecd9464668695d4f9c1d55a2fd9332, reversing
changes made to c72d6c91a7c0c2dc81cc857a1d6db496e84e0065.
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
activerecord/test/models/comment.rb
This change break integration with activerecord-deprecated_finders so
I'm reverting until we find a way to make it work with this gem.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes Issue #13466.
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Changed the call to a scope block to be evaluated with instance_eval.
The result is that ScopeRegistry can use the actual class instead of base_class when
caching scopes so queries made by classes with a common ancestor won't leak scopes.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
| |
Add tests to make sure scopes cannot be create with names such as:
private, protected, public.
Make sure enum values don't collide with those methods too.
|
|
|
|
| |
arel methods are not supposed to be public API for ActiveRecord
|
|
|
|
| |
See #13875
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to dangerous attribute methods, a scope name conflict is
dangerous if it conflicts with an existing class method defined within
`ActiveRecord::Base` but not its ancestors.
See also #13389.
*Godfrey Chan*, *Philippe Creux*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit bring the famous ordinal Array instance methods defined
in ActiveSupport into ActiveRecord as fully-fledged finders.
These finders ensure a default ascending order of the table's primary
key, and utilize the OFFSET SQL verb to locate the user's desired
record. If an offset is defined in the query, calling #second adds
to the offset to get the actual desired record.
Fixes #13743.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm pretty confused about the addition of this method. The documentation
says that it was intended to allow the removal of values from the
default scope (in contrast to #except). However it behaves exactly the
same as except: https://gist.github.com/jonleighton/7537008 (other than
having a slightly enhanced syntax).
The removal of the default scope is allowed by
94924dc32baf78f13e289172534c2e71c9c8cade, which was not a change we
could make until 4.1 due to the need to deprecate things. However after
that change #unscope still gives us nothing that #except doesn't already
give us.
However there *is* a desire to be able to unscope stuff in a way that
persists across merges, which would allow associations to be defined
which unscope stuff from the default scope of the associated model. E.g.
has_many :comments, -> { unscope where: :trashed }
So that's what this change implements. I've also corrected the
documentation. I removed the guide references to #except as I think
unscope really supercedes #except now.
While we're here, there's also a potential desire to be able to write
this:
has_many :comments, -> { unscoped }
However, it doesn't make sense and would not be straightforward to
implement. While with #unscope we're specifying exactly what we want to
be removed from the relation, with "unscoped" we're just saying that we
want it to not have some things which were added earlier on by the
default scope. However in the case of an association, we surely don't
want *all* conditions to be removed, otherwise the above would just
become "SELECT * FROM comments" with no foreign key constraint.
To make the above work, we'd have to somehow tag the relation values
which get added when evaluating the default scope in order to
differentiate them from other relation values. Which is way too much
complexity and therefore not worth it when most use cases can be
satisfied with unscope.
Closes #10643, #11061.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can conditional define the tests depending on the adapter or
connection.
Lets keep the skip for fail tests that need to be fixed.
|
|
|
|
| |
94924dc32baf78f13e289172534c2e71c9c8cade
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allows you to call #unscope on a relation with negative equality operators,
i.e. Arel::Nodes::NotIn and Arel::Nodes::NotEqual that have been generated
through the use of where.not.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix in-memory tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
order on the old ones
The previous behavior added a major backward incompatibility since it
impossible to have a upgrade path without major changes on the
application code.
We are taking the most conservative path to be consistent with the idea
of having a smoother upgrade on Rails 4.
We are reverting the behavior for what was in Rails 3.x and,
if needed, we will implement a new API to prepend the order clauses in
Rails 4.1.
|
| |
|