| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
because Struct.new returns a Class, we just can give it a name and use it directly without inheriting from it
|
| |
|
|
| |
Actually, private methods cannot be called with `self.`, so it's not just redundant, it's a bad habit in Ruby
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
assert [1, 3].includes?(2) fails with unhelpful "Asserting failed" message
assert_includes [1, 3], 2 fails with "Expected [1, 3] to include 2" which makes it easier to debug and more obvious what went wrong
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Style/SpaceBeforeBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideBlockBraces
Style/SpaceInsideHashLiteralBraces
Fix all violations in the repository.
|
| |
|
|
| |
test cases
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This still isn't as separated as I'd like, but it at least moves most of
the burden of alias mapping in one place.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This commit follows up of 6a6dbb4c51fb0c58ba1a810eaa552774167b758a.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Was left in adfab2dcf4003ca564d78d4425566dd2d9cd8b4f
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See #9683 for the reasons we switched to `distinct`.
Here is the discussion that triggered the actual deprecation #20198.
`uniq`, `uniq!` and `uniq_value` are still around.
They will be removed in the next minor release after Rails 5.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contrary to my previous commit message, it wasn't overkill, and led to
much cleaner code.
[Sean Griffin & anthonynavarre]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The last place that was assigning it was when `from` is called with a
relation to use as a subquery. The implementation was actually
completely broken, and would break if you called `from` more than once,
or if you called it on a relation, which also had its own join clause,
as the bind values would get completely scrambled. The simplest solution
was to just move it into its own array, since creating a `FromClause`
class for this would be overkill.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Construction of relations can be a hotspot, we don't want to create one
of these in the constructor. This also allows us to do more expensive
things in the predicate builder's constructor, since it's created once
per AR::Base subclass
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
[Matthew Draper & Yves Senn]
Closes #16860. (pull request to discuss the implementation)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #14752
Select mimics the block interface of arrays, but does not mock the
block interface for select!. This change moves the api to be a
private method, _select!.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The reverse_order method was using a flag to control if the order should
be reversed or not. Instead of using this variable just build the reverse order
inside its proper method.
This implementation was leading to an unexpected behavior when using
reverse_order and then applying reorder(nil).
Example:
Before
Post.order(:name).reverse_order.reorder(nil)
# => SELECT "posts".* FROM "posts" ORDER BY "posts"."id" DESC
After
Post.order(:name).reverse_order.reorder(nil)
# => SELECT "posts".* FROM "posts"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this we can write `Model#select(:aliased)`, `Model#order(:aliased)`,
`Model#reoder(aliased: :desc)`, etc.
Supplementary work to 54122067acaad39b277a5363c6d11d6804c7bf6b.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm pretty confused about the addition of this method. The documentation
says that it was intended to allow the removal of values from the
default scope (in contrast to #except). However it behaves exactly the
same as except: https://gist.github.com/jonleighton/7537008 (other than
having a slightly enhanced syntax).
The removal of the default scope is allowed by
94924dc32baf78f13e289172534c2e71c9c8cade, which was not a change we
could make until 4.1 due to the need to deprecate things. However after
that change #unscope still gives us nothing that #except doesn't already
give us.
However there *is* a desire to be able to unscope stuff in a way that
persists across merges, which would allow associations to be defined
which unscope stuff from the default scope of the associated model. E.g.
has_many :comments, -> { unscope where: :trashed }
So that's what this change implements. I've also corrected the
documentation. I removed the guide references to #except as I think
unscope really supercedes #except now.
While we're here, there's also a potential desire to be able to write
this:
has_many :comments, -> { unscoped }
However, it doesn't make sense and would not be straightforward to
implement. While with #unscope we're specifying exactly what we want to
be removed from the relation, with "unscoped" we're just saying that we
want it to not have some things which were added earlier on by the
default scope. However in the case of an association, we surely don't
want *all* conditions to be removed, otherwise the above would just
become "SELECT * FROM comments" with no foreign key constraint.
To make the above work, we'd have to somehow tag the relation values
which get added when evaluating the default scope in order to
differentiate them from other relation values. Which is way too much
complexity and therefore not worth it when most use cases can be
satisfied with unscope.
Closes #10643, #11061.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a bug when merging relations of different classes.
```
Given:
Post.joins(:author).merge(Author.order(name: :desc)).to_sql
Before:
SELECT "posts".* FROM "posts"
INNER JOIN "authors" ON "authors"."id" = "posts"."author_id"
ORDER BY "posts"."name" DESC
After:
SELECT "posts".* FROM "posts"
INNER JOIN "authors" ON "authors"."id" = "posts"."author_id"
ORDER BY "authors"."name" DESC
```
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Deprecate the delegation of Array bang methods in ActiveRecord::Delegation
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
activerecord/test/cases/relation_test.rb
|
|
|
cases/relation/mutation_test.
|
