| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I’m renaming all instances of `use_transcational_fixtures` to
`use_transactional_tests` and “transactional fixtures” to
“transactional tests”.
I’m deprecating `use_transactional_fixtures=`. So anyone who is
explicitly setting this will get a warning telling them to use
`use_transactional_tests=` instead.
I’m maintaining backwards compatibility—both forms will work.
`use_transactional_tests` will check to see if
`use_transactional_fixtures` is set and use that, otherwise it will use
itself. But because `use_transactional_tests` is a class attribute
(created with `class_attribute`) this requires a little bit of hoop
jumping. The writer method that `class_attribute` generates defines a
new reader method that return the value being set. Which means we can’t
set the default of `true` using `use_transactional_tests=` as was done
previously because that won’t take into account anyone using
`use_transactional_fixtures`. Instead I defined the reader method
manually and it checks `use_transactional_fixtures`. If it was set then
it should be used, otherwise it should return the default, which is
`true`. If someone uses `use_transactional_tests=` then it will
overwrite the backwards-compatible method with whatever they set.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`add_reference` can very helpfully add a multi-column index when you use
it to add a polymorphic reference. However, the first column in the
index is the `id` column, which is less than ideal.
The [PostgreSQL docs][1] say:
> A multicolumn B-tree index can be used with query conditions that
> involve any subset of the index's columns, but the index is most
> efficient when there are constraints on the leading (leftmost)
> columns.
The [MySQL docs][2] say:
> MySQL can use multiple-column indexes for queries that test all the
> columns in the index, or queries that test just the first column, the
> first two columns, the first three columns, and so on. If you specify
> the columns in the right order in the index definition, a single
> composite index can speed up several kinds of queries on the same
> table.
In a polymorphic relationship, the type column is much more likely to be
useful as the first column in an index than the id column. That is, I'm
more likely to query on type without an id than I am to query on id
without a type.
[1]: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/indexes-multicolumn.html
[2]: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/multiple-column-indexes.html
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* Allow to specify a type for foreign key column in migrations
* unified the docs
* some cleanup in CHANGELOG
|
| |/
|
|
| |
[Andrey Novikov & Łukasz Sarnacki]
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
message
|
|
|
Examples:
add_reference :products, :supplier, polymorphic: true, index: true
remove_reference :products, :user
`add_belongs_to` and `remove_belongs_to` are
acceptable.
|
