aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/activerecord/test/cases/attributes_test.rb
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Suppress `warning: BigDecimal.new is deprecated` in activerecordYasuo Honda2017-12-131-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | `BigDecimal.new` has been deprecated in BigDecimal 1.3.3 which will be a default for Ruby 2.5. Refer https://github.com/ruby/bigdecimal/commit/533737338db915b00dc7168c3602e4b462b23503 ``` $ cd rails/activerecord/ $ git grep -l BigDecimal.new | grep \.rb | xargs sed -i -e "s/BigDecimal.new/BigDecimal/g" ``` - Changes made only to Active Record. Will apply the same change to other module once this commit is merged. - The following deprecation has not been addressed because it has been reported at `ActiveRecord::Result.new`. `ActiveRecord::Result.ancestors` did not show `BigDecimal`. * Not addressed ```ruby /path/to/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/mysql/database_statements.rb:34: warning: BigDecimal.new is deprecated ``` * database_statements.rb:34 ```ruby ActiveRecord::Result.new(result.fields, result.to_a) if result ``` * ActiveRecord::Result.ancestors ```ruby [ActiveRecord::Result, Enumerable, ActiveSupport::ToJsonWithActiveSupportEncoder, Object, Metaclass::ObjectMethods, Mocha::ObjectMethods, PP::ObjectMixin, ActiveSupport::Dependencies::Loadable, ActiveSupport::Tryable, JSON::Ext::Generator::GeneratorMethods::Object, Kernel, BasicObject] ``` This commit has been tested with these Ruby and BigDecimal versions - ruby 2.5 and bigdecimal 1.3.3 ``` $ ruby -v ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-12-14 trunk 61217) [x86_64-linux] $ gem list |grep bigdecimal bigdecimal (default: 1.3.3, default: 1.3.2) ``` - ruby 2.4 and bigdecimal 1.3.0 ``` $ ruby -v ruby 2.4.2p198 (2017-09-14 revision 59899) [x86_64-linux-gnu] $ gem list |grep bigdecimal bigdecimal (default: 1.3.0) ``` - ruby 2.3 and bigdecimal 1.2.8 ``` $ ruby -v ruby 2.3.5p376 (2017-09-14 revision 59905) [x86_64-linux] $ gem list |grep -i bigdecimal bigdecimal (1.2.8) ``` - ruby 2.2 and bigdecimal 1.2.6 ``` $ ruby -v ruby 2.2.8p477 (2017-09-14 revision 59906) [x86_64-linux] $ gem list |grep bigdecimal bigdecimal (1.2.6) ```
* Merge pull request #26707 from jcoleman/add_attribute_names_cache_busting_specRyuta Kamizono2017-09-181-0/+2
|\ | | | | Add test validating that Model.attribute_names cache is busted
| * Add test validating that Model.attribute_names cache is bustedJames Coleman2016-10-041-0/+2
| |
* | Use frozen-string-literal in ActiveRecordKir Shatrov2017-07-191-0/+2
| |
* | Revert "Merge pull request #29540 from kirs/rubocop-frozen-string"Matthew Draper2017-07-021-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 3420a14590c0e6915d8b6c242887f74adb4120f9, reversing changes made to afb66a5a598ce4ac74ad84b125a5abf046dcf5aa.
* | Enforce frozen string in RubocopKir Shatrov2017-07-011-0/+1
| |
* | Make the second argument to `attribute` optionalSean Griffin2016-11-301-0/+8
|/ | | | | | | | While working on updating Paper Trail for 5.1 compatibility, I noticed that I was required to pass a second argument to `attribute`. I didn't intend for this to be the case, as `attribute :foo` is totally reasonable shorthand for "I want `attr_accessor :foo`, but also have it work with things like `.attributes` and `ActiveRecord::Dirty`"
* improve error message when include assertions failMichael Grosser2016-09-161-2/+2
| | | | | | assert [1, 3].includes?(2) fails with unhelpful "Asserting failed" message assert_includes [1, 3], 2 fails with "Expected [1, 3] to include 2" which makes it easier to debug and more obvious what went wrong
* Include user defined attributes in inspectSean Griffin2016-08-311-0/+6
| | | | The fact that this only includes column names is an oversight.
* applies new string literal convention in activerecord/testXavier Noria2016-08-061-14/+14
| | | | | The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion, we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.
* Correct the behavior of virtual attributes on models loaded from the dbSean Griffin2016-07-251-0/+44
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously we had primarily tested the behavior of these attributes by calling `.new`, allowing this to slip through the cracks. There were a few ways in which they were behaving incorrectly. The biggest issue was that attempting to read the attribute would through a `MissingAttribute` error. We've corrected this by returning the default value when the attribute isn't backed by a database column. This is super special cased, but I don't see a way to avoid this conditional. I had considered handling this higher up in `define_default_attribute`, but we don't have the relevant information there as users can provide new defaults for database columns as well. Once I corrected this, I had noticed that the attributes were always being marked as changed. This is because the behavior of `define_default_attribute` was treating them as assigned from `Attribute::Null`. Finally, with our new implementation, `LazyAttributeHash` could no longer be marshalled, as it holds onto a proc. This has been corrected as well. I've not handled YAML in that class, as we do additional work higher up to avoid YAML dumping it at all. Fixes #25787 Close #25841
* Support for unified Integer class in Ruby 2.4+Jeremy Daer2016-05-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Ruby 2.4 unifies Fixnum and Bignum into Integer: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12005 * Forward compat with new unified Integer class in Ruby 2.4+. * Backward compat with separate Fixnum/Bignum in Ruby 2.2 & 2.3. * Drops needless Fixnum distinction in docs, preferring Integer.
* Define ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null#type_castMatthew Erhard2016-05-111-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | Using ActiveRecord::Base.attribute to declare an attribute with a default value on a model where the attribute is not backed by the database would raise a NotImplementedError when model.save is called. The error originates from https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/59d252196b36f6afaafd231756d69ea21537cf5d/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute.rb#L84. This is called from https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/59d252196b36f6afaafd231756d69ea21537cf5d/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute.rb#L46 on an ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null object. This commit corrects the behavior by implementing ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null#type_cast. With ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null#type_cast defined, ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null#value (https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/59d252196b36f6afaafd231756d69ea21537cf5d/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute.rb#L173..L175) can be replaced with its super method (https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/59d252196b36f6afaafd231756d69ea21537cf5d/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute.rb#L36..L40). fixes #24979
* Memoize user provided defaults before type castingSean Griffin2016-03-241-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a proc is given as a default value, the form builder ends up displaying `Proc#to_s` when the default is used. That's because we didn't handle the proc until type casting. This issue technically can occur any time that a proc is the value before type casting, but in reality the only place that will occur is when a proc default is provided through the attributes API, so the best place to handle this edge case is there. I've opted to memoize instead of just moving the `Proc#call` up, as this made me realize that it could potentially interact very poorly with dirty checking. The code here is a little redundant, but I don't want to rely on how `value_before_type_cast` is implemented in the super class, even if it's just an `attr_reader`. Fixes #24249 Close #24306
* Ensure `#reset_column_information` clears child classes as wellSean Griffin2015-11-071-0/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | I've added a redundant test for this under the attributes API as well, as that also causes this bug to manifest through public API (and demonstrates that calling `reset_column_information` on the child classes would be insufficient) Since children of a class should always share a table with their parent, just reloading the schema from the cache should be sufficient here. `reload_schema_from_cache` should probably become public and `# :nodoc:`, but I'd rather avoid the git churn here. Fixes #22057
* use `assert_not` instead of `refute` as mentioned in our guides.Yves Senn2015-08-131-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | As described in the "Follow Coding Conventions" section in our contribution guide (http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.html#follow-the-coding-conventions) we favor `assert_not` over `refute`. While we don't usually make stylistic changes on it's own I opted to do it in this case. The reason being that test cases are usually copied as a starting point for new tests. This results in a spread of `refute` in files that have been using it already.
* Fix minor typo in test nameSean Griffin2015-07-201-1/+1
|
* Persist user provided default values, even if unchangedSean Griffin2015-05-281-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a usability change to fix a quirk from our definition of partial writes. By default, we only persist changed attributes. When creating a new record, this is assumed that the default values came from the database. However, if the user provided a default, it will not be persisted, since we didn't see it as "changed". Since this is a very specific case, I wanted to isolate it with the other quirks that come from user provided default values. The number of edge cases which are presenting themselves are starting to make me wonder if we should just remove the ability to assign a default, in favor of overriding `initialize`. For the time being, this is required for the attributes API to not have confusing behavior. We had to delete one test, since this actually changes the meaning of `.changed?` on Active Record models. It now specifically means `changed_from_database?`. While I think this will make the attributes API more ergonomic to use, it is a subtle change in definition (though not a backwards incompatible one). We should probably figure out the right place to document this. (Feel free to open a PR doing that if you're reading this). /cc @rafaelfranca @kirs @senny This is an alternate implementation of #19921. Close #19921. [Sean Griffin & Kir Shatrov]
* Allow proc defaults with the Attributes APISean Griffin2015-05-281-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | This is a variant implementation of the changes proposed in #19914. Unlike that PR, the change in behavior is isolated in its own class. This is to prevent wonky behavior if a Proc is assigned outside of the default, and it is a natural place to place the behavior required by #19921 as well. Close #19914. [Sean Griffin & Kir Shatrov]
* Follow-up to #10776Robin Dupret2015-02-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | The name `ActiveModel::AttributeAssignment::UnknownAttributeError` is too implementation specific so let's move the constant directly under the ActiveModel namespace. Also since this constant used to be under the ActiveRecord namespace, to make the upgrade path easier, let's avoid raising the former constant when we deal with this error on the Active Record side.
* `type_cast_from_user` -> `cast`Sean Griffin2015-02-171-1/+1
|
* `Type#type_cast_from_database` -> `Type#deserialize`Sean Griffin2015-02-171-1/+1
|
* Allow a symbol to be passed to `attribute`, in place of a type objectSean Griffin2015-02-061-5/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The same is not true of `define_attribute`, which is meant to be the low level no-magic API that sits underneath. The differences between the two APIs are: - `attribute` - Lazy (the attribute will be defined after the schema has loaded) - Allows either a type object or a symbol - `define_attribute` - Runs immediately (might get trampled by schema loading) - Requires a type object This was the last blocker in terms of public interface requirements originally discussed for this feature back in May. All the implementation blockers have been cleared, so this feature is probably ready for release (pending one more look-over by me).
* Attribute assignment and type casting has nothing to do with columnsSean Griffin2015-01-311-15/+28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's finally finished!!!!!!! The reason the Attributes API was kept private in 4.2 was due to some publicly visible implementation details. It was previously implemented by overloading `columns` and `columns_hash`, to make them return column objects which were modified with the attribute information. This meant that those methods LIED! We didn't change the database schema. We changed the attribute information on the class. That is wrong! It should be the other way around, where schema loading just calls the attributes API for you. And now it does! Yes, this means that there is nothing that happens in automatic schema loading that you couldn't manually do yourself. (There's still some funky cases where we hit the connection adapter that I need to handle, before we can turn off automatic schema detection entirely.) There were a few weird test failures caused by this that had to be fixed. The main source came from the fact that the attribute methods are now defined in terms of `attribute_names`, which has a clause like `return [] unless table_exists?`. I don't *think* this is an issue, since the only place this caused failures were in a fake adapter which didn't override `table_exists?`. Additionally, there were a few cases where tests were failing because a migration was run, but the model was not reloaded. I'm not sure why these started failing from this change, I might need to clear an additional cache in `reload_schema_from_cache`. Again, since this is not normal usage, and it's expected that `reset_column_information` will be called after the table is modified, I don't think it's a problem. Still, test failures that were unrelated to the change are worrying, and I need to dig into them further. Finally, I spent a lot of time debugging issues with the mutex used in `define_attribute_methods`. I think we can just remove that method entirely, and define the attribute methods *manually* in the call to `define_attribute`, which would simplify the code *tremendously*. Ok. now to make this damn thing public, and work on moving it up to Active Model.
* Extracted `ActiveRecord::AttributeAssignment` to ↵Bogdan Gusiev2015-01-231-1/+1
| | | | | | `ActiveModel::AttributesAssignment` Allows to use it for any object as an includable module.
* Don't modify the columns hash to set defaults from the attributes APISean Griffin2014-10-311-10/+14
| | | | | Nothing is directly using the columns for the default values anymore. This step helps us get closer not not mutating the columns hash.
* Rename `property` to `attribute`Sean Griffin2014-06-071-0/+111
For consistency with https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/15557