aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/activerecord/test/cases/attributes_test.rb
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Define ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null#type_castMatthew Erhard2016-05-111-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | Using ActiveRecord::Base.attribute to declare an attribute with a default value on a model where the attribute is not backed by the database would raise a NotImplementedError when model.save is called. The error originates from https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/59d252196b36f6afaafd231756d69ea21537cf5d/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute.rb#L84. This is called from https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/59d252196b36f6afaafd231756d69ea21537cf5d/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute.rb#L46 on an ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null object. This commit corrects the behavior by implementing ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null#type_cast. With ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null#type_cast defined, ActiveRecord::Attribute::Null#value (https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/59d252196b36f6afaafd231756d69ea21537cf5d/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute.rb#L173..L175) can be replaced with its super method (https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/59d252196b36f6afaafd231756d69ea21537cf5d/activerecord/lib/active_record/attribute.rb#L36..L40). fixes #24979
* Memoize user provided defaults before type castingSean Griffin2016-03-241-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a proc is given as a default value, the form builder ends up displaying `Proc#to_s` when the default is used. That's because we didn't handle the proc until type casting. This issue technically can occur any time that a proc is the value before type casting, but in reality the only place that will occur is when a proc default is provided through the attributes API, so the best place to handle this edge case is there. I've opted to memoize instead of just moving the `Proc#call` up, as this made me realize that it could potentially interact very poorly with dirty checking. The code here is a little redundant, but I don't want to rely on how `value_before_type_cast` is implemented in the super class, even if it's just an `attr_reader`. Fixes #24249 Close #24306
* Ensure `#reset_column_information` clears child classes as wellSean Griffin2015-11-071-0/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | I've added a redundant test for this under the attributes API as well, as that also causes this bug to manifest through public API (and demonstrates that calling `reset_column_information` on the child classes would be insufficient) Since children of a class should always share a table with their parent, just reloading the schema from the cache should be sufficient here. `reload_schema_from_cache` should probably become public and `# :nodoc:`, but I'd rather avoid the git churn here. Fixes #22057
* use `assert_not` instead of `refute` as mentioned in our guides.Yves Senn2015-08-131-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | As described in the "Follow Coding Conventions" section in our contribution guide (http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.html#follow-the-coding-conventions) we favor `assert_not` over `refute`. While we don't usually make stylistic changes on it's own I opted to do it in this case. The reason being that test cases are usually copied as a starting point for new tests. This results in a spread of `refute` in files that have been using it already.
* Fix minor typo in test nameSean Griffin2015-07-201-1/+1
|
* Persist user provided default values, even if unchangedSean Griffin2015-05-281-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a usability change to fix a quirk from our definition of partial writes. By default, we only persist changed attributes. When creating a new record, this is assumed that the default values came from the database. However, if the user provided a default, it will not be persisted, since we didn't see it as "changed". Since this is a very specific case, I wanted to isolate it with the other quirks that come from user provided default values. The number of edge cases which are presenting themselves are starting to make me wonder if we should just remove the ability to assign a default, in favor of overriding `initialize`. For the time being, this is required for the attributes API to not have confusing behavior. We had to delete one test, since this actually changes the meaning of `.changed?` on Active Record models. It now specifically means `changed_from_database?`. While I think this will make the attributes API more ergonomic to use, it is a subtle change in definition (though not a backwards incompatible one). We should probably figure out the right place to document this. (Feel free to open a PR doing that if you're reading this). /cc @rafaelfranca @kirs @senny This is an alternate implementation of #19921. Close #19921. [Sean Griffin & Kir Shatrov]
* Allow proc defaults with the Attributes APISean Griffin2015-05-281-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | This is a variant implementation of the changes proposed in #19914. Unlike that PR, the change in behavior is isolated in its own class. This is to prevent wonky behavior if a Proc is assigned outside of the default, and it is a natural place to place the behavior required by #19921 as well. Close #19914. [Sean Griffin & Kir Shatrov]
* Follow-up to #10776Robin Dupret2015-02-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | The name `ActiveModel::AttributeAssignment::UnknownAttributeError` is too implementation specific so let's move the constant directly under the ActiveModel namespace. Also since this constant used to be under the ActiveRecord namespace, to make the upgrade path easier, let's avoid raising the former constant when we deal with this error on the Active Record side.
* `type_cast_from_user` -> `cast`Sean Griffin2015-02-171-1/+1
|
* `Type#type_cast_from_database` -> `Type#deserialize`Sean Griffin2015-02-171-1/+1
|
* Allow a symbol to be passed to `attribute`, in place of a type objectSean Griffin2015-02-061-5/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The same is not true of `define_attribute`, which is meant to be the low level no-magic API that sits underneath. The differences between the two APIs are: - `attribute` - Lazy (the attribute will be defined after the schema has loaded) - Allows either a type object or a symbol - `define_attribute` - Runs immediately (might get trampled by schema loading) - Requires a type object This was the last blocker in terms of public interface requirements originally discussed for this feature back in May. All the implementation blockers have been cleared, so this feature is probably ready for release (pending one more look-over by me).
* Attribute assignment and type casting has nothing to do with columnsSean Griffin2015-01-311-15/+28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's finally finished!!!!!!! The reason the Attributes API was kept private in 4.2 was due to some publicly visible implementation details. It was previously implemented by overloading `columns` and `columns_hash`, to make them return column objects which were modified with the attribute information. This meant that those methods LIED! We didn't change the database schema. We changed the attribute information on the class. That is wrong! It should be the other way around, where schema loading just calls the attributes API for you. And now it does! Yes, this means that there is nothing that happens in automatic schema loading that you couldn't manually do yourself. (There's still some funky cases where we hit the connection adapter that I need to handle, before we can turn off automatic schema detection entirely.) There were a few weird test failures caused by this that had to be fixed. The main source came from the fact that the attribute methods are now defined in terms of `attribute_names`, which has a clause like `return [] unless table_exists?`. I don't *think* this is an issue, since the only place this caused failures were in a fake adapter which didn't override `table_exists?`. Additionally, there were a few cases where tests were failing because a migration was run, but the model was not reloaded. I'm not sure why these started failing from this change, I might need to clear an additional cache in `reload_schema_from_cache`. Again, since this is not normal usage, and it's expected that `reset_column_information` will be called after the table is modified, I don't think it's a problem. Still, test failures that were unrelated to the change are worrying, and I need to dig into them further. Finally, I spent a lot of time debugging issues with the mutex used in `define_attribute_methods`. I think we can just remove that method entirely, and define the attribute methods *manually* in the call to `define_attribute`, which would simplify the code *tremendously*. Ok. now to make this damn thing public, and work on moving it up to Active Model.
* Extracted `ActiveRecord::AttributeAssignment` to ↵Bogdan Gusiev2015-01-231-1/+1
| | | | | | `ActiveModel::AttributesAssignment` Allows to use it for any object as an includable module.
* Don't modify the columns hash to set defaults from the attributes APISean Griffin2014-10-311-10/+14
| | | | | Nothing is directly using the columns for the default values anymore. This step helps us get closer not not mutating the columns hash.
* Rename `property` to `attribute`Sean Griffin2014-06-071-0/+111
For consistency with https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/15557