| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
by Active Support)
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Get rid of ActiveModel::Configuration, make better use of
ActiveSupport::Concern + class_attribute, etc.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
From 2c667f69aa2daac5ee6c29ca9679616e2a71532a.
Thanks @pwnall for the heads-up.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem: We need to be able to specify configuration in a way that
can be inherited to models that include ActiveRecord::Model. So it is
no longer sufficient to put 'top level' config on ActiveRecord::Base,
but we do want configuration specified on ActiveRecord::Base and
descendants to continue to work.
So we need something like class_attribute that can be defined on a
module but that is inherited when ActiveRecord::Model is included.
The solution: added ActiveModel::Configuration module which provides a
config_attribute macro. It's a bit specific hence I am not putting this
in Active Support or making it a 'public API' at present.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This reverts commit ee2be435b1e5c0e94a4ee93a1a310e0471a77d07.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
If we don't have a primary key when we ask for it, it's better to fail
fast. Fixes GH #2307.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a situation I encountered where a subclass would cache the
name of a generated attribute method in @_defined_class_methods. Then,
when the superclass has it's attribute methods undefined, the subclass
would always have to dispatch through method_missing, because the
presence of the attribute in @_defined_class_methods would mean that it
is never generated again, even if undefine_attribute_methods is called
on the subclass.
There various other confusing edge cases like this. STI classes share
columns, so let's just keep all the attribute method generation state
isolated to the base class.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
RUNNING_UNIT_TESTS file for details, but essentially you can now configure things in test/config.yml. You can also run tests directly via the command line, e.g. ruby path/to/test.rb (no rake needed, uses default db connection from test/config.yml). This will help us fix the CI by enabling us to isolate the different Rails versions to different databases.
|
| |
|
|
| |
There're a lot of places in Rails source code which make a lot of sense to switching to Object#in? or Object#either? instead of using [].include?.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
