| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It's not really a good idea to have this as a global config option. We
should allow people to specify the behaviour per association.
There will now be two new values:
* :dependent => :restrict_with_exception implements the current
behaviour of :restrict. :restrict itself is deprecated in favour of
:restrict_with_exception.
* :dependent => :restrict_with_error implements the new behaviour - it
adds an error to the owner if there are dependent records present
See #4727 for the original discussion of this.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
by Active Support)
Selecting which key extensions to include in active_support/rails
made apparent the systematic usage of Object#in? in the code base.
After some discussion in
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/5ea6b0df9a36d033f21b52049426257a4637028d
we decided to remove it and use plain Ruby, which seems enough
for this particular idiom.
In this commit the refactor has been made case by case. Sometimes
include? is the natural alternative, others a simple || is the
way you actually spell the condition in your head, others a case
statement seems more appropriate. I have chosen the one I liked
the most in each case.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
On reflection, it seems like a bit of a weird method to have on
ActiveRecord::Base, and it shouldn't be needed most of the time anyway.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 3803fcce26b837c0117f7d278b83c366dc4ed370.
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
It will be deprecated only in 4.0, and removed properly in 4.1.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
User.order("name asc").order("created_at desc")
# SELECT * FROM users ORDER BY created_at desc, name asc
This also affects order defined in `default_scope` or any kind of associations.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It doesn't serve much purpose now that ActiveRecord::Base.all returns a
Relation.
The code is moved to active_record_deprecated_finders.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Previously it returned an Array.
If you want an array, call e.g. `Post.to_a` rather than `Post.all`. This
is more explicit.
In most cases this should not break existing code, since
Relations use method_missing to delegate unknown methods to #to_a
anyway.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes #1190
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
interpolation is no longer a thing separate from "normal" assoc
conditions.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
now everything is converted to the new style, this is not needed
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Improve the derivation of HABTM join table name to take account of nesting.
It now takes the table names of the two models, sorts them lexically and
then joins them, stripping any common prefix from the second table name.
Some examples:
Top level models
(Category <=> Product)
Old: categories_products
New: categories_products
Top level models with a global table_name_prefix
(Category <=> Product)
Old: site_categories_products
New: site_categories_products
Nested models in a module without a table_name_prefix method
(Admin::Category <=> Admin::Product)
Old: categories_products
New: categories_products
Nested models in a module with a table_name_prefix method
(Admin::Category <=> Admin::Product)
Old: categories_products
New: admin_categories_products
Nested models in a parent model
(Catalog::Category <=> Catalog::Product)
Old: categories_products
New: catalog_categories_products
Nested models in different parent models
(Catalog::Category <=> Content::Page)
Old: categories_pages
New: catalog_categories_content_pages
Also as part of this commit the validity checks for HABTM assocations have
been moved to ActiveRecord::Reflection One side effect of this is to move when
the exceptions are raised from the point of declaration to when the association
is built. This is consistant with other association validity checks.
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fair connection pool2
Conflicts:
activerecord/test/cases/associations/eager_test.rb
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The core of this fix is a threadsafe, fair Queue class. It is
very similar to Queue in stdlib except that it supports waiting
with a timeout.
The issue this solves is that if several threads are contending for
database connections, an unfair queue makes is possible that a thread
will timeout even while other threads successfully acquire and release
connections. A fair queue means the thread that has been waiting the
longest will get the next available connection.
This includes a few test fixes to avoid test ordering issues that
cropped up during development of this patch.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Reason: If metadata is not cached extra sql statements
will be executed, which causes failures tests with assert_queries().
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Several tests that passed when run in the order they are loaded
by rake test were failing when run in different sequences due to
problems with the implementation of assert_queries and
assert_no_queries as well as incorrect assumptions made about
how many queries might be executed by a database adapter in
various cases.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Merge commit 6f1d9d00ffd9d411b2bd488da4eb92b7e2fd972e
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I found the next issue between CollectionAssociation `delete`
and `destroy`.
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :pets
end
person.pets.destroy(1)
# => OK, returns the destroyed object
person.pets.destroy("2")
# => OK, returns the destroyed object
person.pets.delete(1)
# => ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
person.pets.delete("2")
# => ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
Adding support for deleting with a fixnum or string like
`destroy` method.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The fix commited in e2a070c was returning the `new_target`, as
a try to return whatever user replaced association with. The
problem is, the resulting association target may be ordered
differently. In such case we want to return the target that
will be later used for that association.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Bug #6289
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
JonRowe/patch_uniq_has_and_belongs_to_many_when_already_loaded
When Active Record has already loaded a unique association `.size` returns the wrong number.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
of the uniq array
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Makes it consistent with Relation. Can't see a use for this.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This helps bring the interfaces of CollectionProxy and Relation closer
together, and reduces the delegation backflips we need to perform.
For example, first_or_create is defined thus:
class ActiveRecord::Relation
def first_or_create(...)
first || create(...)
end
end
If CollectionProxy < Relation, then post.comments.first_or_create will
hit the association's #create method which will actually add the new record
to the association, just as post.comments.create would.
With the previous delegation, post.comments.first_or_create expands to
post.comments.scoped.first_or_create, where post.comments.scoped has no
knowledge of the association.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Change CollectionProxy#method_missing to use scoped.public_send, to
avoid a problem described in issue #2508 when trying to use class
methods with names like "open", that clash with private kernel methods.
Also changed the dynamic matcher instantiator to send straight to
scoped, to avoid another roundtrip to method_missing.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
things
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
