| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`inverse_of` on through associations was accidently removed/caused to
stop working in commit f8d2899 which was part of a refactoring on
`ThroughReflection`.
To fix we moved `inverse_of` and `check_validity_of_inverse!` to the
`AbstractReflection` so it's available to the `ThroughReflection`
without having to dup any methods. We then need to delegate `inverse_name`
method in `ThroughReflection`. `inverse_name` can't be moved to
`AbstractReflection` without moving methods that set the instance
variable `@automatic_inverse_of`.
This adds a test that ensures that `inverse_of` on a `ThroughReflection`
returns the correct class name, and the correct record for the inverse
relationship.
Fixes #21692
|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
ActiveRecord: use association's `unscope` when preloading
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When I originally reviewed the #20317, I believe these changes were
present, but it appears that it was later updated so that they were
removed. Since Travis hadn't re-run the build, this slipped through.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
`restrict_with_error` message will now respect owner’s human name
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| | |
locale [kuboon & Ronak Jangir]
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current implementation has a lot of utility methods that accept
reflection call a lot of methods on it and exit.
E.g. has_counter_cache?(reflection)
It causes confusion and inability to cache result of the method even
through it always returns the same result for the same reflection
object.
It can be done easier without access to the association context
by moving code into reflection itself.
e.g. reflection.has_counter_cache?
Reflection is less complex object than association so moving code there
automatically makes it simplier to understand.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since after 87d1aba3c `dependent: :destroy` callbacks on has_one
assocations run *after* destroy, it is possible that a nullification is
attempted on an already destroyed target:
class Car < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :engine, dependent: :nullify
end
class Engine < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :car, dependent: :destroy
end
> car = Car.create!
> engine = Engine.create!(car: car)
> engine.destroy! # => ActiveRecord::ActiveRecordError: cannot update a
> destroyed record
In the above case, `engine.destroy!` deletes `engine` and *then* triggers the
deletion of `car`, which in turn triggers a nullification of `engine.car_id`.
However, `engine` is already destroyed at that point.
Fixes #21223.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Correct error message in Standard American english and add a test cas…
|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
Require explicit counter_cache option for has_many
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Assert that counter_cache behaviour is not used on belongs_to or
has_many associations if the option is not given explicitly.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As described in the "Follow Coding Conventions" section in our
contribution guide (http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.html#follow-the-coding-conventions)
we favor `assert_not` over `refute`.
While we don't usually make stylistic changes on it's own I opted to do
it in this case. The reason being that test cases are usually copied as
a starting point for new tests. This results in a spread of `refute` in
files that have been using it already.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If the through class has default scopes we should skip the statement
cache.
Closes #20745.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes #21082
remove extra space
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Fix misleading errors for has_one through relations
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Deep down in the association internals, we're calling `destroy!` rather
than `destroy` when handling things like `dependent` or autosave
association callbacks. Unfortunately, due to the structure of the code
(e.g. it uses callbacks for everything), it's nearly impossible to pass
whether to call `destroy` or `destroy!` down to where we actually need
it.
As such, we have to do some legwork to handle this. Since the callbacks
are what actually raise the exception, we need to rescue it in
`ActiveRecord::Callbacks`, rather than `ActiveRecord::Persistence` where
it matters. (As an aside, if this code wasn't so callback heavy, it
would handling this would likely be as simple as changing `destroy` to
call `destroy!` instead of the other way around).
Since we don't want to lose the exception when `destroy!` is called (in
particular, we don't want the value of the `record` field to change to
the parent class), we have to do some additional legwork to hold onto it
where we can use it.
Again, all of this is ugly and there is definitely a better way to do
this. However, barring a much more significant re-architecting for what
I consider to be a reletively minor improvement, I'm willing to take
this small hit to the flow of this code (begrudgingly).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Previously `has_one` and `has_many` associations were using the
`one` and `many` keys respectively. Both of these keys have special
meaning in I18n (they are considered to be pluralizations) so by
renaming them to `has_one` and `has_many` we make the messages more
explicit and most importantly they don't clash with linguistical
systems that need to validate translation keys (and their
pluralizations).
The `:'restrict_dependent_destroy.one'` key should be replaced with
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.has_one'`, and
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.many'` with
`:'restrict_dependent_destroy.has_many'`.
[Roque Pinel & Christopher Dell]
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We deprecate the support for passing an argument to force reload in
6eae366d0d2e5d5211eeaf955f56bd1dc6836758. That led to several
deprecation warning when running Active Record test suite.
This commit silence the warnings by properly calling `#reload` on the
association proxy or on the association object instead. However, there
are several places that `ActiveSupport::Deprecation.silence` are used as
those tests actually tests the force reload functionality and will be
removed once `master` is targeted next minor release (5.1).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is to simplify the association API, as you can call `reload` on the
association proxy or the parent object to get the same result.
For collection association, you can call `#reload` on association proxy
to force a reload:
@user.posts.reload # Instead of @user.posts(true)
For singular association, you can call `#reload` on the parent object to
clear its association cache then call the association method:
@user.reload.profile # Instead of @user.profile(true)
Passing a truthy argument to force association to reload will be removed
in Rails 5.1.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The changes introduced to through associations in c80487eb were quite
interesting. Changing `relation.merge!(scope)` to `relation =
relation.merge(scope)` should in theory never cause any changes in
behavior. The subtle breakage led to a surprising conclusion.
The old code wasn't doing anything! Since `merge!` calls
`instance_exec` when given a proc, and most scopes will look something
like `has_many :foos, -> { where(foo: :bar) }`, if we're not capturing
the return value, it's a no-op. However, removing the `merge` causes
`unscope` to break.
While we're merging in the rest of the chain elsewhere, we were never
merging in `unscope` values, causing a breakage on associations where a
default scope was being unscoped in an association scope (yuk!). This is
subtly related to #20722, since it appears we were previously relying on
this mutability.
Fixes #20721.
Fixes #20727.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix `undefined method uncached` for polymorphic belongs_to #20426
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Unitialized polymorphic `belongs_to` associations raise an error while
attempting to reload, as they attempt to make an uncached reload, but
don't have a klass to fetch uncachedly. In this case, `loaded?` should
be `false` anyway.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
thrown ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch when assigning a wrong value for a namespaced association
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
for a namespaced association
fixes #20541
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
relationship without the foreign key attribute
fixes regression reported on #20253
ActiveRecord::Base#[] was not used cause of 8b95420
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
See #9683 for the reasons we switched to `distinct`.
Here is the discussion that triggered the actual deprecation #20198.
`uniq`, `uniq!` and `uniq_value` are still around.
They will be removed in the next minor release after Rails 5.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The old `test_create_bang_returns_falsy_when_join_record_has_errors` had
a missleading name and was a duplicate of
`test_save_should_not_raise_exception_when_join_record_has_errors`.
Since it had an assertion on the return value I renamed it accordingly
and got rid of the duplicate test.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When `AR::Base.save!` or `AR::Base.destroy!` is called and an exception
is raised, the exception doesn't have any error message or has a weird
message like `#<FailedBulb:0x0000000907b4b8>`. Give a better message so
we can easily understand why it's failing to save/destroy.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In 1f006c an option was added called :class to allow passing anonymous
classes to association definitions. Since using :class instead of
:class_name is a fairly common typo even amongst experienced developers
this can result in hard to debug errors arising in raise_on_type_mismatch?
To fix this we're renaming the option from :class to :anonymous_class as
that is a more correct description of what the option is for. Since this
was an internal, undocumented option there is no need for a deprecation.
Fixes #19659
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[fixes #18606]
Make belongs_to use touch over touch_later when running the callbacks.
Add more tests and small method rename
Thanks Jeremy for the feedback.
|
| |
|
|
| |
When replacing a has_many association with the same one, there is nothing to do with database but a setter method should still return the substituted value for backward compatibility.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
- Eager loading was not working for the default_scope (class method)
for 'find' & 'find_by' methods.
- Fixed these by adding a new check 'respond_to?(:default_scope)'.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Reuse the CollectionAssociation#reader proxy cache if the foreign key is present from the start.
Conflicts:
activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
present from the start.
When a new record has the necessary information prior to save, we can
avoid busting the cache.
We could simply clear the @proxy on #reset or #reset_scope, but that
would clear the cache more often than necessary.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I’m renaming all instances of `use_transcational_fixtures` to
`use_transactional_tests` and “transactional fixtures” to
“transactional tests”.
I’m deprecating `use_transactional_fixtures=`. So anyone who is
explicitly setting this will get a warning telling them to use
`use_transactional_tests=` instead.
I’m maintaining backwards compatibility—both forms will work.
`use_transactional_tests` will check to see if
`use_transactional_fixtures` is set and use that, otherwise it will use
itself. But because `use_transactional_tests` is a class attribute
(created with `class_attribute`) this requires a little bit of hoop
jumping. The writer method that `class_attribute` generates defines a
new reader method that return the value being set. Which means we can’t
set the default of `true` using `use_transactional_tests=` as was done
previously because that won’t take into account anyone using
`use_transactional_fixtures`. Instead I defined the reader method
manually and it checks `use_transactional_fixtures`. If it was set then
it should be used, otherwise it should return the default, which is
`true`. If someone uses `use_transactional_tests=` then it will
overwrite the backwards-compatible method with whatever they set.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit ff18049ca6f27deb7e7f955478e1464f8d756332.
This broke the AR build for every adapter:
1) Error:
AssociationCallbacksTest#test_dont_add_if_before_callback_raises_exception:
Exception: You can't add a post
2) Failure:
QueryCacheTest#test_query_cache_doesnt_leak_cached_results_of_rolled_back_queries [/Users/senny/Projects/rails/activerecord/test/cases/query_cache_test.rb:235]:
Expected: 1
Actual: 0
I'm reverting to get the build green again.
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| | |
Preserve Array#take(n) behaviour of HasManyAssociation
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/| |
Move `UnknownAttributeError` to a more sane namespace
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The name `ActiveModel::AttributeAssignment::UnknownAttributeError` is
too implementation specific so let's move the constant directly under
the ActiveModel namespace.
Also since this constant used to be under the ActiveRecord namespace, to
make the upgrade path easier, let's avoid raising the former constant
when we deal with this error on the Active Record side.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Various behaviors needed by associations (such as creating the through
record) are lost when `where` is called, since we stop having a
`CollectionProxy` and start having an `AssociationRelation` which does
not contain this behavior. I *think* we should be able to rm
`AssociationRelation`, but we have tests saying the changes required to
do that would be bad (Without saying why. Of course. >_>)
Fixes #19073.
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| | |
rebyn/fix/17161-remove-objs-from-has_many-updates-fields
Add specs for adding-to/clear has_many collections’s behavior on `updated_at`
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
There are behaviors mentioned in #17161 that:
1. are not documented properly, and
2. don't have specs
This commit addresses the spec absence. For has_many collections,
1. addition (<<) should update the associated object's updated_at (if any)
2. .clear, depending on options[:dependent], calls delete_all, destroy_all, or nullifies the associated object(s)' foreign key.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Deprecate `required` option in favor of `optional` for belongs_to.
|
