| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I’m renaming all instances of `use_transcational_fixtures` to
`use_transactional_tests` and “transactional fixtures” to
“transactional tests”.
I’m deprecating `use_transactional_fixtures=`. So anyone who is
explicitly setting this will get a warning telling them to use
`use_transactional_tests=` instead.
I’m maintaining backwards compatibility—both forms will work.
`use_transactional_tests` will check to see if
`use_transactional_fixtures` is set and use that, otherwise it will use
itself. But because `use_transactional_tests` is a class attribute
(created with `class_attribute`) this requires a little bit of hoop
jumping. The writer method that `class_attribute` generates defines a
new reader method that return the value being set. Which means we can’t
set the default of `true` using `use_transactional_tests=` as was done
previously because that won’t take into account anyone using
`use_transactional_fixtures`. Instead I defined the reader method
manually and it checks `use_transactional_fixtures`. If it was set then
it should be used, otherwise it should return the default, which is
`true`. If someone uses `use_transactional_tests=` then it will
overwrite the backwards-compatible method with whatever they set.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes #18696.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
to drop sequences at the same time each tables dropped for Oracle
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Since 'drop table if exists' statement does not always work with
some databases such as Oracle.
|
|
|
In addition to defining the association, a `required` association will
also have its presence validated.
Before:
```ruby
belongs_to :account
validates_presence_of :account
```
After:
```ruby
belongs_to :account, required: true
```
This helps to draw a distinction between types of validations, since
validations on associations are generally for data integrity purposes,
and aren't usually set through form inputs.
|
